Political Events in a Partisan Media Ecology: Asymmetric Influence on Candidate Appraisals

References

• Aday, S. (2010). Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistan war coverage on NBC and Fox News channel. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01472.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A., & Renno, L. (2019). Nonpartisans as false negatives: The mismeasurement of party identification in public opinion surveys. The Journal of Politics, 81(3), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1086/703129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. (2014). Remembering to forget: A note on the duration of campaign advertising effects. Political Communication, 31(4), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.956198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J., & Sobieraj, S. (2014). The outrage industry: Political opinion media and the new incivility. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Druckman, J., & Cook, F. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, J., Freeman, J., Hitt, M., & Pevehouse, J. (2014). Time series analysis for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camaj, L. (2019). Motivational theories of agenda-setting effects: An information selection and processing model of attribute agenda-setting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(3), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M., & Lee, F. (2014). Selective exposure and agenda setting: Exploring the impact of partisan media exposure on agenda diversity and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(4), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.903424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, N. (2018, June 14). Did Comey cost Clinton the election? Why we’ll never know. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/upshot/did-comey-cost-clinton-the-election-why-well-never-know.html
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, A., Ekins, E., & Kirby, D. (2018). The long-lasting effects of newspaper op-eds on public opinion. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00016112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2000). Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilliplane, S. (2014). Activation, conversion, or reinforcement? The impact of partisan news exposure on vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerly, S. (2015). Red media, blue media, and purple media: News repertoires in the colorful media landscape. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.998220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerly, S., Mourao, R., Thorson, E., & Tham, S. (2020). When do audiences verify? How perceptions about message and source influence audience verification of news headlines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019864680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, D. (1988). Predictions of public opinion from the mass media. Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., & Benkler, Y. (2017). Partisan, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Berkman Klein Center. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3019414
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33(3), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, E., & Ridout, T. (2009). Local television and newspaper coverage of political advertising. Political Communication, 26(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902850635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, L., Shah, D., Wagner, M., Wells, C., Cramer, K., & Pevehouse, J. (2022). Battleground: Asymmetric communication ecologies and the erosion of civil society in Wisconsin (Elements in Politics and Communication). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108946780
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R., & Stroud, N. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Goel, S., Rivers, D., & Rothschild, D. (2016). The mythical swing voter. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00015031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & King, G. (1993). Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable? British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 409–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006682
   Google Scholar
• Gillette, F. (2017, July 20). The Sinclair revolution will be televised. It’ll just have low production values. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-07-20/the-sinclair-revolution-will-be-televised-it-ll-just-have-low-production-values
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J., Mockabee, S., & Monson, J. (2010). Campaign effects on the accessibility of party identification. Political Research Quarterly, 63(4), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909336269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, M., & Hopkins, D. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedding, K., Miller, K., Abdenour, J., & Blankenship, J. (2019). The Sinclair effect: Comparing ownership influences on bias in local TV news content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(3), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1653103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, S., Lo, J., Vavreck, L., & Zaller, J. (2013). How quickly we forget: The duration of persuasion effects from mass communication. Political Communication, 30(4), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.828143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillygus, D., & Jackman, S. (2003). Voter decision making in election 2000. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun, K., & Moon, S. (2016). Agenda setting in the partisan TV news context: Attribute agenda setting and polarized evaluation of presidential candidates among viewers of NBC, CNN, and Fox News. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(3), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016628820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (2000). New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, G. (2015). How do campaigns matter? Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072012-113556
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., & Brady, H. (2002). The rolling cross-section design. Electoral Studies, 21(2), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00022-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkowitz, M., Mitchell, A., Shearer, E., & Walker, M. (2020, January 24). U.S. media polarization and the 2020 election. Pew Research Center. https://www.journalism.org/2020/01/24/u-s-media-polarization-and-the-2020-election-a-nation-divided/
   Google Scholar
• Kosmidis, S. (2014). Heterogeneity and the calculus of turnout: Undecided respondents and the campaign dynamics of civic duty. Electoral Studies, 33(2014), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Leeper, T., & Slothuus, R. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers? American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G., & McCrain, J. (2019). Local news and national politics. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J., & Johnston, R. (2010). The campaign dynamics of economic voting. Electoral Studies, 29(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2009.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. (1972). Attitude change: The information processing paradigm. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 108–141). Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (2007). Slanted objectivity? Perceived media bias, cable news exposure, and political attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 88(3), 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00479.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muddiman, A., Stroud, N., & McCombs, M. (2014). Media fragmentation, attribute agenda setting, and political opinions about Iraq. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., & Webster, J. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. (2016, December 7). News coverage of the 2016 general election: How the press failed the voters. The Shorenstein Center. https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2015). Egocentric publics and perceptions of the worlds around us. In H. Gil de Zúñiga (Ed.), New technologies and civic engagement: New agendas in communication (pp. 93–102). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103(4), 734–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph, T., & Evans, J. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00148.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searles, K., Smith, G., & Sui, M. (2018). Partisan media, electoral predictions, and wishful thinking. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 888–910. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy006
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D., Watts, M., Domke, D., & Fan, D. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 339–370. https://doi.org/10.1086/341396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D., Zhang, Y., Pevehouse, J., & Valenzuela, S. (2021). Counter a reactive media system. In R. Hart (Ed.), Fixing American politics: Civic priorities for the media age. Routledge. 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, D. (1999). The impact of news media favorability and candidate events in presidential campaigns. Political Communication, 16(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, E. (2018). Social media outpaces print newspapers in the U.S. as a news source. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/12/10/social-media-outpaces-print-newspapers-in-the-u-s-as-a-news-source/
   Google Scholar
• Sikorski, C., Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2020). How political scandals affect the electorate. Political Psychology, 41(3), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G., & Searles, K. (2014). Who let the (attack) dogs out? New evidence for partisan media effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonnahme, B. (2014). Surviving scandal: An exploration of the immediate and lasting effects of scandal on candidate evaluation. Social Science Quarterly, 95(5), 1308–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866–1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M., Domke, D., Shah, D., & Fan, D. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns: Explaining public perceptions of a liberal press. Communication Research, 26(2), 144–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B., & Holbert, R. (2013). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013482906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinschenk, A., & Panagopoulos, C. (2018). The dynamics of voter preferences in the 2016 presidential election. The Forum, 16(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-0008
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. (2019). Irony and outrage. The polarized landscape of race, fear, and laughter in the United States. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar