Self-Consistency and Self-Enhancement Motivation Impacts on Selective Exposure to Politics — A SESAM Model Application

References

• Appiah, O., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Alter, S. (2013). Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news reading. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, F. (1868). (Spedding, J., Ellis, R., and Heath, D., Trans.). (Original work published 1620. The new organon. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Williams, E. L. (2006). The automaticity of social life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00395.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., & Lui, L. N. (1989). The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition, 7(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1989.7.3.262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadinu, M., & Galdi, S. (2012). Gender differences in implicit gender self-categorization lead to stronger gender self-stereotyping by women than by men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(5), 546–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadinu, M., Latrofa, M., & Carnaghi, A. (2013). Comparing self-stereotyping with in-group-stereotyping and out-group-stereotyping in unequal-status groups: The case of gender. Self and Identity, 12(6), 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2012.712753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughell, L. (2016). The political battle of the sexes: Exploring the sources of gender gaps in policy preferences. Lanhan.
   Google Scholar
• Champely, S. (2018). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R Package Version, 1.2-2. Available fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr.
   Google Scholar
• Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek, J. M., Tropp, L. R., Chen, L. C., & Underwood, M. K. (1994, August). Identity Orientations: Personal, social, and collective aspects of identity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA
   Google Scholar
• Clay, R., Barber, J. M., & Shook, N. J. (2013). Techniques for measuring selective exposure: A critical review. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(3–4), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.813925
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, K. (2020, August 10). What you need to know about the record numbers of women candidates in 2020. The Center for American Women and Politics. https://cawp.rutgers.edu/election-analysis/record-numbers-women-candidates-2020
   Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W. (2009). Cognitive dissonance theory—A roller coaster career. In I. Hartmann (Ed.), Media choice: A theoretical and empirical overview (pp. 128–148). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dvir Gvirsman, S. (2019). Political social identity and selective exposure. Media Psychology, 22(6), 867–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1554493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, G. C. N. (2018, March 27). Representation matters. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/life-in-the-intersection/201803/representation-matters
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, J., & Anderson, K. (2002). The presence and portrayal of social groups on prime-time television. Communication Reports, 15(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210209367756
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, J., Giles, H., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1994). The genesis of vitality theory: Historical patterns and discoursal dimensions. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 108(1), 167–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1994.108.167
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, E. R., Zillmann, D., & Erickson, G. A. (1992). Costs and benefits of allegiance: Change in fans’ self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, L. F., & Carnahan, D. (2020). Which bad news to choose? The influence of race and social identity on story selections within negative news contexts. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(3), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019892632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J. M., Parker, K., & Stepler, R. (2017, October 18). Views of gender in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/10/18/wide-partisan-gaps-in-u-s-over-how-far-the-country-has-come-on-gender-equality/
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Hahn, K. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Walker, J. (2008). Selective exposure to campaign communication: The role of anticipated agreement and issue public membership. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, K., & Greenberg, J. (1989). In-group salience, intergroup comparison, and individual performance and self-esteem. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289154013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective-exposure theory and research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Appiah, O., & Alter, S. (2008). News selection patterns as a function of race: The discerning minority and the indiscriminating majority. Media Psychology, 11(3), 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802178542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Hastall, M. R. (2010). Please your self: Social identity effects on selective exposure to news about in- and out-groups. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Johnson, B. K. (2014). Selective exposure for better or worse: Its mediating role for online news’ impact on political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., & Polavin, N. (2020). Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Communication Research, 47(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Romero, J. P. (2011). Body ideals in the media: Perceived attainability and social comparison choices. Media Psychology, 14(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.547833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Westerwick, A. (in press). Algorithmic personalization of source cues in the filter bubble: Self-esteem and self-construal impact information exposure. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027963
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Westerwick, A., & Sude, D. J. (2020). Media choice and selective exposure. In M. B. Oliver, A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media Effects (4th ed., pp. 146–162). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 903–933. 10.1037//0033-2909.128.6.903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, N., & Harrison, K. (2012). Racial and gender differences in the relationship between children’s television use and self-esteem: A longitudinal panel study. Communication Research, 39(3), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211401376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, S. (2018, September 17). Record number of women running for office in 2018 midterms. Washington Times. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/17/record-number-of-women-running-for-office-in-2018-/
   Google Scholar
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research, 47(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, -H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. h ttps://d oi-org/1 0.1037/a0012702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochman, J. M. (1996). The effects of nongender-role stereotyped, same-sex role models in storybooks on the self-esteem of children in grade three. Sex Roles, 35(11–12), 711–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmer, L. L. (2021). The road to gender equality: Persisting obstacles for American women in the workforce. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 24(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, G. D. H., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2019). Is the confirmation bias bubble larger online? Pre-election confirmation bias in selective exposure to online versus print political information. Mass Communication and Society, 22(4), 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1599956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasubramanian, S., Doshi, M., & Saleem, M. (2017). Mainstream versus ethnic media: How they shape ethnic pride and self-esteem among ethnic minority audiences. International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 1879–1899. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6430
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Remnick, D. (2018, October 10). One year of #MeToo. The New Yorker. www.newyorker.com
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Kricheli-Katz, T. (2013). Intersecting cultural beliefs in social relations: Gender, race, and class binds and freedoms. Gender & Society, 27(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213479445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, M., Badea, C., & Jetten, J. (2014). Low status groups show in-group favoritism to compensate for their low status and compete for higher status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(5), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213514122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 494–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarge, M. A., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Impacts of efficacy and exemplification in an online message about weight loss on weight management self-efficacy, satisfaction, and personal importance. Journal of Health Communication, 18(7), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.757392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 3, pp. 1570–1573). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Social Security Administration. (2017, May 2). Popular names of the period 1960s. https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/babynames/decades/names1960s.html
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sude, D. J., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Robinson, M. J., & Westerwick, A. (2019). “Pick and choose” opinion climate: How browsing of political messages shapes public opinion perceptions and attitudes. Communication Monographs, 86(4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1612528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, A. S., & Tan, G. (1979). Television use and self-esteem of blacks. Journal of Communication, 29(1), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1979.tb01691.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1924). The nature of intelligence. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, A. J. (2011). The role of actors’ race in white audiences’ selective exposure to movies. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01544.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerwick, A., Kleinman, S. B., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013). Turn a blind eye if you care: Impacts of attitude consistency, importance, and credibility on seeking of political information and implications for attitudes. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. (2021). What predicts selective exposure online: Testing political attitudes, credibility, and social identity. Communication Research, 48(5), 687–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219844868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., & Garrett, R. K. (2018). Social identity, selective exposure, and affective polarization: How priming national identity shapes attitudes toward immigrants via news selection. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqx010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., Knobloch, S., & Yu, H. (2001). Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology, 3(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0304_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar