An Overdue Contribution: Mass Communication Theory in the Security of Democracy

References

• Aiolfi, T. (2022). Populism as a transgressive style. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac006
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., Gravelle, T. B., Osmundsen, M., Petersen, M. B., Reifler, J., & Scotto, T. J. (2021). Some people just want to watch the world burn: The prevalence, psychology and politics of the ‘need for chaos.' Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1_suppl), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkin, J. M. (2020). The cycles of constitutional time. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, S. (2021). A free and responsible university: The Hutchins Commission, the press, and academia. Journalism History, 47(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.2020.1866408
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonansinga, D. (2020). Who thinks, feels: The relationship between emotions, politics and populism. Partecipazione E Conflitto, 13(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v13i1p83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgida, E., Federico, C. M., & Sullivan, J. L. (2009). Introduction: Normative conceptions of democratic citizenship and evolving empirical research. In E. Borgida, C. M. Federico, & J. L. Sullivan (Eds.), The political psychology of democratic citizenship (pp. 1–20). Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. K., & Mourão, R. R. (2021). Protest coverage matters: How media framing and visual communication affects support for Black civil rights protests. Mass Communication and Society, 24(4), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1884724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G., & Fackler, M. (2014). The genesis of social responsibility theory. In R. S. Fortner & P. Mark Fackler (Eds.), The handbook of media and mass communication theory (pp. 333–356). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Corduneanu-Huci, C., & Hamilton, A. (2022). Selective control: The political economy of censorship. Political Communication, 39(4), 517–538. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10584609.2022.2074587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2020). Post-democracy after the crisis. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M. (2007). Recursive governance: Contemporary political communication and public policy. Political Communication, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, T. G. (2019). Democratic decay: Conceptualising an emerging research field. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(2), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00086-2
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2019). Ill winds: Saving democracy from Russia rage, Chinese ambition and American complacency. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Ekström, M., Patrona, M., & Thornborrow, J. (2020). The normalization of the populist radical right in news interviews: A study of journalistic reporting on the Swedish democrats. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1762984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geise, S., Klinger, U., Magin, M., Müller, K. F., Nitsch, C., Riesmeyer, C., Rothenberger, L., Schumann, C., Sehl, A., Wallner, C., & Zillich, A. F. (2022). The normativity of communication research: A content analysis of normative claims in peer-reviewed journal articles (1970–2014). Mass Communication and Society, 25(4), 528–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1987474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guckenheimer, J., & Ottino, J. M. (2008). Foundations for complex systems research in the physical sciences and engineering (Report from the NSF workshop September). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Guriev, S., & Treisman, D. (2019). Informational autocrats. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 100–127. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (2021). Backsliding: Democratic regress in the contemporary world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. (1992). The passing of the “high modernism” of American Journalism. Journal of Communication, 42(3), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00794.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., & Lawless, J. L. (2018). The decline of local news and its effects: New evidence from longitudinal data. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 332–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, B. (2014). Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory, 24(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, B., & Langmann, K. (2020). Professionalism as a response to right-wing populism? An analysis of a metajournalistic discourse. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5643–5662. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2022). What researchers must do differently after January 6th, 2021. Medium. https://medium.com/@dkreiss/what-researchers-must-do-differently-after-january-6th-2021-62ed75b4476f
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & Barrett, B. (2020). What can and should platforms be responsible for? Knight Foundation. https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Copy-of-Daniel-Kreiss_Barrett_PlatformResponsibility.docx-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, A. I., & Gruber, J. B. (2021). Political agenda setting in the hybrid media system: Why legacy media still matter a great deal. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220925023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, E. T. (2008). The anti-intellectual presidency: The decline of presidential rhetoric from George Washington to George W. Bush. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. (2021). Virtue hoarders: The case against the professional managerial class. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDevitt, M. (2020). Where ideas go to die: The fate of intellect in American journalism. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• McDevitt, M. (2022a). Journalism and democratic backsliding: Critical realism as a diagnostic and prescription for reform. Political Communication, 39(4), 500–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2045401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDevitt, M. (2022b). Social control of intellect. Four features of the academic-media nexus. Communication Theory, 32(3), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, M. (2018). The dynamics and political implications of anti-intellectualism in the United States. American Politics Research, 46(3), 465–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17719507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moy, P., & Pfau, M. (2000). With malice toward all? The media and public confidence in democratic institutions. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, L. (2020). Angry by design: Toxic communication and technical architectures. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00550-7
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2018). The monarchy of fear: A philosopher looks at our political crisis. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Över, D. (2021). Democratic backsliding and the media: The convergence of news narratives in Turkey. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720975879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panievsky, A. (2021). Covering populist media criticism: When journalists’ professional norms turn against them. International Journal of Communication, 15, 2136–2155. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, P. (2020). Researching with our hair on fire: Three frameworks for rethinking news in a postnormative world. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(2), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020916425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, P. (2021). “Down the middle”: CNN 10 and the ideology of objectivity. Journalism Practice, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2008812
   Google Scholar
• Parks, P. (2022). It’s time journalists take “minimize harm” seriously: Lessons from the Trump era. In R. E. Gutsche Jr. (Ed.), The future of the presidency, journalism, and democracy (pp. 314–334). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (2016). News coverage of the 2016 general election: How the press failed the voters. Harvard Kennedy School Working Paper. https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/
   Google Scholar
• Peruško, Z. (2021). Public sphere in hybrid media systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Javnost: The Public, 28(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1861405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Osmundsen, M., & Bor, A. (2021). Beyond populism: The psychology of status-seeking and extreme political discontent. In J. P. Forgas, W. D. Crano, & K. Fiedler (Eds.), The psychology of populism: The tribal challenges to liberal democracy (pp. 62–80). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. (2019). Democracy without journalism? Confronting the misinformation society. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. (2021). The crisis of the institutional press. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. J. (1976). Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: The case of “The selling of the Pentagon. American Political Science Review, 70(2), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the public good? Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P. (2020). After the post-public sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7–8), 1545–1563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720948003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (2008). Why conversation is not the sole of democracy. In M. Schudson (Ed.), Why democracies need an unlovable press (pp. 94–107). Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. (2019). Knowledge, power, and academic freedom. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (19561984). Four theories of the press. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sintomer, Y. (2013). Les sens de la representation: Usages et mésusages d’une notion [The meaning of representation: Uses and misuses of a notion]. Raisons Politiques, 2(50), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.050.0013
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. (2017). On tyranny: Twenty lessons from the twentieth century. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, M. (2020). Ghosting the news: Local journalism and the crisis of American democracy. Columbia Global Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Susánszky, P., Kopper, A., & Zsigó, F. T. (2022). Media framing of political protests – Reporting bias and the discrediting of political activism. Post-Soviet Affairs, 38(4), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2061817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 663–664. https://doi.org/10.1086/225193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. (2019). Political theory of populism. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeule, A. (2022, February 3). Supreme court justices have forgotten what the law is for. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/03/opinion/us-supreme-court-nomination.html
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein, M., Esser, F., Büchel, F., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Schulz, A., Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Müller, P., & Wirth, W. (2019). What drives populist styles? Analyzing immigration and labor market news in 11 countries. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(2), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018805408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabanci, B. (2016). Populism as the problem child of democracy: The AKP’s enduring appeal and the use of meso-level actors. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 591–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1242204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar