Political Identity and News Media Choice: The Polarizing Logic of Selective Exposure During the Catalan Independence Conflict

References

• Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Cryderman, J. (2013). Communication, Persuasion, and the conditioning value of selective exposure: Like minds may unite and divide but they mostly tune out. Political Communication, 30(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arriaza Ibarra, K. (2013). The situation of national and regional public television in Spain. Nordicom Review, 34(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2013-0048
   Google Scholar
• Barrio, A., Barberà, O., & Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (2019). The populist dimensions of Catalan secessionism: Rhetoric, mobilization and institutional practices. In R. Heinisch; E. Massetti, & O. Mazzoleni (Eds.), The people and the nation: Populism and ethno-territorial politics in Europe (pp. 88–109). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barrio, A., & Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (2017). Reducing the gap between leaders and voters? Elite polarization, outbidding competition, and the rise of secessionism in Catalonia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(10), 1776–1794. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1213400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. The Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. (2016). Nation binding: How public service broadcasting mitigates political selective exposure. PloS One, 11(5), e0155112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (2001). Ethnonationalism: Cultural concerns. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 4870–4874). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Camaj, L. (2019). From selective exposure to selective information processing: A motivated reasoning approach. Media and Communication, 7(3), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenal, A. S., Aguilar-Paredes, C., Galais, C., & Pérex-Montoro, M. (2019). Digital technologies and selective exposure: How choice and filter bubbles shape news media exposure. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(4), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219862988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Herrero, L., Nir, L., & Skovsgaard, M. (2018). Bridging gaps in cross-cutting media exposure: The role of public service broadcasting. Political Communication, 35(4), 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1476424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, R., Barber, J. M., & Shook, N. J. (2013). Techniques for measuring selective exposure: A critical review. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(3–4), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.813925
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. M., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2019). Reinforcing spirals at work? Mutual influences between selective news exposure and ideological leaning. European Journal of Communication, 34(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119830056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W. (1991). Exposure to political content in newspapers: The impact of cognitive dissonance on reader’s selectivity. European Journal of Communication, 6(2), 155–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006002003
   Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W., & Mothes, C. (2013). The dissonant self: Contributions from dissonance theory to a new agenda for studying political communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679124
   Google Scholar
• Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2017). Media audience homophile: Partisan websites, audience identity and polarization processes. New Media & Society, 19(7), 1072–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815625945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2019). Political social identity and selective exposure. Media Psychology, 22(6), 867–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1554493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., de Vreese, C. H., Strömback, J., van Aelst, P., Aalberg, T., Stanyer, J., Lengauer, G., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Salgado, S., Sheafer, T., & Reinemann, C. (2012). Political information opportunities in Europe: A longitudinal and comparative study of thirteen television systems. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(3), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212442956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., Stroud, N. J., Bimber, B., & Wojcieszak, M. (2013). Assessing selective exposure in experiments: The implications of different methodological choices. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(3–4), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.813923
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). How polarized are online and offline news audiences? A comparative analysis of twelve countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219892768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraile, M., & Meilán, X. (2012). Los medios de comunicación y la información política en las elecciones europeas de 2009 [Mass media and political information in the 2009 European elections. In M. Torcal and J. Font (Eds.), Elecciones Europeas 2009 (pp. 109–137). CIS.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon, A., Montagut, M., & Moragas-Fernández, C. M. (2019). Discourses, actors and citizens in the communicative construction of conflicts: The Catalan case. Catalan Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies, 11(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. The Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S., & Mutz, D. (2011). The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28(1), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, B. W., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). Presidential campaign dynamics and the ebb and flow of talk as a moderator: Media exposure, knowledge, and political discussion. Communication Theory, 19(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hierro, M. J. (2012). Change in national identification: A study of Catalan case [ Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid]. https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/10285/52319_Hierro_Maria_Jose.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Holt, L. F., & Carnahan, D. (2020). Which bad news to choose? The influence of race and social identity on story selections within negative news contexts. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(3), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019892632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humanes, M. L. (2014). Exposición Selectiva y partidismo de las audiencias en España. El consumo de información política durante las campañas electorales de 2008 y 2011 [Selective exposure and partisanship among audiences in Spain. Consumption of political information during election campaigns of 2008 and 2011]. Palabra Clave, 17(3), 773–802.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. The Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2012). Selective exposure and reinforcement of attitudes and partisanship before a presidential election. The Journal of Communication, 62(4), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01651.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). The selective exposure self- and affect-management (SESAM) model: Applications in the realms of race, politics, and health. Communication Research, 42(7), 959–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214539173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Kleinman, S. (2012). Pre-election selective exposure: Confirmation bias versus informational utility. Communication Research, 39(2), 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211400597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Liu, L., Hino, A., Westerwick, A., & Johnson, B. K. (2019). Context impacts on confirmation bias: Evidence from the 2017 Japanese snap election compared with American and German findings. Human Communication Research, 45(4), 427–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. The Journal of Communication, 61(2), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951–971. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. (2013). Partisan media exposure and attitudes towards the opposition. Political Communication, 30(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 299–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Amat, M. (2020a). One country, two media systems: The evolution of the media audience in Catalonia in the context of the independence debate. Comunicació: Revista de Recerca I d’Anàlisi, 37(1), 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Amat, M. (2020b). Media performance during the “Catalan process”: Trends in mainstream media audiences and news framing in the course of the independence debate in Catalonia [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Herrera, E. (2002). From nation-building to building identi?cation with political communities: Consequences of political decentralization in Spain, the Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia, 1978–2001. European Journal of Political Research, 41(4), 421–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2012). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullainathan, S., & Shleifer, A. (2005). The market for news. The American Economic Review, 95(4), 1031–1053. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, G. (2016). ¿O catalanistas o fachas? La influencia del eje nacional sobre la percepción de los partidos catalanes en el eje izquierda-derecha [Catalan natioanlist or fascists? The influence of the national axis on the perception of Catalan parties on the left-right divide]. Quaderns de L’Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, 12, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sampedro, V., López-Ferrández, F. J., & Hidalgo, P. (2021). Digital disintermediation, technical and national sovereignty: The Internet shutdown of Catalonia’s ‘independence referendum. European Journal of Communication, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211012143
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, I. (2013). Just a matter of identity? Support for independence in Catalonia. Regional & Federal Studies, 23(5), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2013.775945
   Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, M., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2016). Opportunity structures for selective exposure: Investigating selective exposure and learning in Swedish election campaigns using panel survey data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216658157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steppat, D., Castro Herrero, L., & Esser, F. (2021). Selective exposure in different political information environments – How media fragmentation and polarization shape congruent news use. European Journal of Communication, 37(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211012141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. The Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., & Muddiman, A. (2013). Selective exposure, tolerance, and satirical news. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.Com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Stanyer, J. … Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
   Google Scholar