Does Length Matter? The Impact of Fact-Check Length in Reducing COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation

References

• Alexander, B., Barrett, K., Cumming, S., Herron, P., Holland, C., Keane, K., Ogburn, J., Orlowitz, J., Thomas, M. A., & Tsao, J. (2016). Information overload and underload. Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings, George Mason University, Virginia, US.
   Google Scholar
• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amazeen, M. A., Thorson, E., Muddiman, A., & Graves, L. (2018). Correcting political and consumer misperceptions: The effectiveness and effects of rating scale versus contextual correction formats. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016678186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelman, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltas, G. (2003). Determinants of internet advertising effectiveness: An empirical study. International Journal of Market Research, 45(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530304500403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2020). Information overload: An overview. In Oxford encyclopedia of political decision making. Oxford University Press. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/23544/
   Google Scholar
• Bermes, A. (2021). Information overload and fake news sharing: A transactional stress perspective exploring the mitigating role of consumers’ resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermes, A. (2021). Information overload and fake news sharing: A transactional stress perspective exploring the mitigating role of consumers’ resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. The Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2018). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashier, N. M., Pennycook, G., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Timing matters when correcting fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(5). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020043118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalan-Matamoros, D., & Elías, C. (2020). Vaccine hesitancy in the age of coronavirus and fake news: Analysis of journalistic sources in the Spanish quality press. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Duckworth, K. L., & Darke, P. (1999). When parsimony fails. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PL100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Duckworth, K., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1001_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, W. -Y.S., Gaysynsky, A., & Vanderpool, R. C. (2021). The COVID-19 Misinfodemic: Moving beyond fact-checking. Health Education & Behavior, 48(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120980675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2008). The concept of information overload-a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, mis, and related disciplines (2004). Kommunikationsmanagement im Wandel, 271–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9772-2_15
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, E. (2021). Understanding why some people are not taking Covid-19 vaccines and how to gain their confidence. https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/understanding-why-some-people-are-not-taking-covid-19-vaccines-and-how-gain-their
   Google Scholar
• Gao, M., Xiao, Z., Karahalios, K., & Fu, W. -T. (2018). To label or not to label: The effect of stance and credibility labels on readers’ selection and perception of news articles. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274324
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., Nisbet, E. C., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). Undermining the corrective effects of media-based political fact checking? The role of contextual cues and naïve theory. The Journal of Communication, 63(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gov.sg. (2020). Clarifications: Misinformation, rumours regarding COVID-19. https://www.gov.sg/article/covid-19-clarifications
   Google Scholar
• Graves, L., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2016). Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: A field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking. The Journal of Communication, 66(1), 102–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, D. J. (2008). Information overload. In The International encyclopedia of communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci022
   Google Scholar
• Guo, N., Zhao, S. Z., Weng, X., Wu, Y., Luk, T. T., Wong, J. Y. H., Lam, T. H., & Wang, M. P. (2021). Associations of COVID-19 online information sources and information overload with psychological distress symptoms: A population-based study. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(7), 1330–1338. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, L., & McCann, K. (2008). An integrated model of advertising clutter in offline and online media. International Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0265048708080153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Powell, T. E., Van Der Meer, T. G., & Bos, L. (2020). A picture paints a thousand lies? The effects and mechanisms of multimodal disinformation and rebuttals disseminated via social media. Political Communication, 37(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1674979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoq, K. M. G. (2014). Information overload: Causes, consequences and remedies-A study. Philosophy and Progress, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.3329/pp.v55i1-2.26390
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. L., Starbird, K., Orand, M., Stanek, S. A., & Pedersen, H. T. (2015). Connected through crisis: Emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675202
   Google Scholar
• Information, M. o. C. a. (2020). Gov.sg launches new channels to keep the public informed about COVID-19. https://www.mci.gov.sg/pressroom/news-and-stories/pressroom/2020/4/gov-sg-launches-new-channels-to-keep-the-public-informed-about-covid-19
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D., Carcioppolo, N., King, A. J., Scherr, C. L., Jones, C. L., & Niederdeppe, J. (2014). The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: Establishing predictive and discriminant validity. Patient Education and Counseling, 94(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaleel, I., Wimmer, B. C., Peterson, G. M., Zaidi, S. T. R., Roehrer, E., Cummings, E., & Lee, K. (2020). Health information overload among health consumers: A scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Hastall, M. R. (2010). Please your self: Social identity effects on selective exposure to news about in-and out-groups. The Journal of Communication, 60(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999a). The illusory second mode or, the cue is the message. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PL100217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999b). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PL100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvetanová, Z., Predmerská, A. K., & Švecová, M. (2020). Debunking as a method of uncovering disinformation and fake news. In J. Višňovsky & J. Radošinská (Eds.), Fake news is bad news-hoaxes, half-truths and the nature of today’s journalism (pp 59–­78). IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Laato, S., Islam, A. N., Islam, M. N., & Whelan, E. (2020). What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic? European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1770632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. (2017). Factually website clarifies ‘widespread’ falsehoods. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/factually-website-clarifies-widespread-falsehoods
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B. Y. (2021). As Covid-19 Vaccine Microchip Conspiracy Theories Spread, Here Are Responses On Twitter. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/05/09/as-covid-19-vaccine-microchip-conspiracy-theories-spread-here-are-some-responses/?sh=273cda8e602d
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekmat, E. (2020). Nudge effect of fact-check alerts: Source influence and media skepticism on sharing of news misinformation in social media. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change (pp. 1–24). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Erb, H. -P., Spiegel, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Informational length and order of presentation as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poynter. (2021). Number of fact-checking outlets surges to 188 in more than 60 countries. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2019/number-of-fact-checking-outlets-surges-to-188-in-more-than-60-countries/
   Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., Freeman, A. L., & van der Linden, S. (2021). How accurate are accuracy-nudge interventions? A preregistered direct replication of Pennycook et al.(2020). Psychological Science, 32(7), 09567976211024535. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211024535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, R. (2007). Filtering and withdrawing: Strategies for coping with information overload in everyday contexts. Journal of Information Science, 33(5), 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506077418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaewitz, L., Kluck, J. P., Klösters, L., & Krämer, N. C. (2020). When is disinformation (In)credible? Experimental findings on message characteristics and individual differences. Mass Communication and Society, 23(4), 484–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1716983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetz, S. W., Sykes, T. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Combating COVID-19 fake news on social media through fact checking: Antecedents and consequences. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1895682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F., Sheer, V. C., & Li, R. (2015). Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E., & Lee, J. C. B. (2022). When viruses and misinformation spread: How young Singaporeans navigated uncertainty in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak. New Media & Society, 24(3), 1461444820968212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820968212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C., Lee, J., Chew, M., Tan, F. X., & Goh, Z. H. (2021). Falling for fake news: The role of political bias and cognitive ability. Asian Journal of Communication, 31(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.1941149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, C., Meeus, Q., Peperkamp, J., & Berendt, B. (2019). A digital nudge to counter confirmation bias. Frontiers in Big Data, 2, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorson, E. (2016). Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication, 33(3), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee, M., & Lim, M. (2020). Black dot research. https://read-a.com/social-responsibility-guard-against-fake-news-nicholas-fang-black-dot-research/
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., Kallgren, C. A., & Preisler, R. M. (1985). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report – 86. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200415-sitrep-86-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=c615ea20_6
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. J., Aloe, A. M., & Feeley, T. H. (2014). Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Communication, 64(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S., & Goldring, A. (2018). Fact-checking effectiveness as a function of format and tone: Evaluating FactCheck. org and FlackCheck. org. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017710453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Featherstone, J. D., Calabrese, C., & Wojcieszak, M. (2021). Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines. Preventive Medicine, 145, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar