Media Exposure, Perceived Personal Impact, and Third-Person Effect

REFERENCES

• Andsager, J. L., & White, H. A. (2007). Self versus others: Media, messages, and the third-person effect. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, E. W., Chen, M.-J., & Grube, J. W. (2006). How does alcohol advertising influence underage drinking? The role of desirability, identification and skepticism. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 376–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banning, S. A. (2001). Do you see what I see? Third-person effects on public communication through self-esteem, social stigma, and product use. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 127–147.
   Google Scholar
• Benelli, E. (2003). The role of the media in steering public opinion on healthcare issues. Health Policy, 63, 179–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, C. L., & Nichter, M. (2009). Biocommunicability and the biopolitics of pandemic threats. Medical Anthropology, 28, 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infections—Chicago, Illinois, April—July 2009. MMWR, 58, 913–918.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). H1N1 flu (swine flu): Resources for colleges and universities. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/institutions/.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. (2012). News coverage of health-related issues and its impacts on perceptions: Taiwan as an example. Health Communication, 27, 111–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. L., Vijaykumar, S., Wray, R., & Karamehic-Muratovic, A. (2008). The minimization of public health risks in newspapers after Hurricane Katrina. Communication Research Reports, 25, 266–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, C. (1993). The influence of mass media and interpersonal communication on societal and personal risk judgments. Communication Research, 20, 611–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLorme, D. E., Huh, J., & Reid, L. N. (2006). Age differences in how consumers behave following exposure to DTC advertising. Health Communication, 20, 255–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, L., & Wallack, L. (2007). Moving nutrition upstream: The case for reframing obesity. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 39(2), S45–S50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, P. D., & Salwen, M. B. (1997). Self-perceived knowledge of the O. J. Simpson trial: Third-person perception and perceptions of guilt. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 541–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, J. M., & Mullin, B. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., Nathanson, A. I., Detenber, B. H., & McLeod, D. M. (1999). Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of exposure and third-person perception. Communication Research, 26, 275–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Attitudes and Social Cognition, 90, 351–367.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53, 199–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S. (2012). The knowledge gap hypothesis in Singapore: The roles of socio-economic status, mass media, and interpersonal discussion on public knowledge of the H1N1 flu pandemic. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 695–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C., & Rehkoff, R. A. (2011). Young voter's responses to the 2004 U.S. presidential election: Social identity, perceived media influence, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Communication, 61, 732–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-I., & Shih, H.-H. (2010). Transmission and control of an emerging influenza pandemic in a small-world airline network. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivory, J. D., & Kalyanaraman, S. (2009). Video games make people violent—Well, maybe not that game: Effects of content and person abstraction on perceptions of violent video games' effects and support of censorship. Communication Reports, 22, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, D. (2009). Swine flu deaths show this flu is different—Experts. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 49(10), i–ii.
   Google Scholar
• Keresztes, P. A. (2009). Novel influenza A (H1N1): What nurses need to know. MEDSURG Nursing, 18, 302–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353–383). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, V.-H., & Wei, R. (2002). Third-person effect, gender and support for restriction of pornography on the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, V.-H., Wei, R., & Su, H. (2013). Self-efficacy, information processing strategies and acquisition of knowledge. Asian Journal of Communication, 23, 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., Detenber, B. H., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51, 678–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirick, P. C. (2005). Rethinking the target corollary: The effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 32, 822–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, T. A., & Duck, J. M. (2001). Communication and health beliefs: Mass and interpersonal influences on perceptions of risk to self and others. Communication Research, 28, 602–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, E., Lo, B., Pollack, L., Donelan, K., & Lee, K. (2004). Direct-to-consumer advertising: Public perceptions of its effects on health behaviors, health care, and the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 17, 6–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, G., Noda, T., & Kawaoka, Y. (2009). Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 swine flu virus. Nature, 459, 931–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, K., & Frederick, E. (2002). Extending the framework of third-, first-, and second-person effects. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 113–140.
   Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, K., Frederick, E., & Mayo, C. (2002). Person-effects and heuristic-systematic processing. Communication Research, 29, 320–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third-person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983–1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third-person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1, 353–378.
   Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (2009). The third-person effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 252–268). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. P., & Gilpin, E. A. (2001). News media coverage of smoking and health is associated with changes in population rates of smoking cessation but not initiation. Tobacco Control, 10, 145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., Huang, L.-N., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). Third-person effects of news coverage: Orientations toward media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 525–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1996). Measuring the third-person effect of news: The impact of question order, contrast and knowledge. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 120–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratzan, S. C. (2010). All health is local: The H1N1 vaccine. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1986). The main source: Learning from television news. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., Shah, D. V., & Faber, R. J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucinski, D., & Salmon, C. T. (1990). The other as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29, 345–368.
   Google Scholar
• Salwen, M. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2001). Third-person perception of television violence: The role of self-perceived knowledge. Media Psychology, 3, 211–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2009). Pathogens gone wild? Medical anthropology and the “swine flu” pandemic. Medical Anthropology, 28, 199–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siu, W. (2008). Extended parallel process model and H5N1 influenza virus. Psychological Reports, 102, 539–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., Hayes, A. F., & Ford, V. L. (2007). Examining the moderating and mediating roles of news exposure and attention on adolescent judgments of alcohol-related risks. Communication Research, 34, 355–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A., Ferrara, M., & Witte, K. (2007). Social sides of health risks: Stigma and collective efficacy. Health Communication, 21, 55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, R. A. (2009). Lessons from outbreaks of H1N1 influenza. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 59–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58, 280–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorow, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychological, 43, 473–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Cook, F. L. (1984). The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and social level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh-Childers, K., & Brown, J. D. (2009). Effects of media on personal and public health. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 469–489). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Chia, S., & Lo, V.-H. (2011). Influence of the third-person effect and hostile media perception on voter attitudes toward polls in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 169–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Lo, V.-H., & Lu, H.-Y. (2007). Reconsidering the relationship between the third-person perception and optimistic bias. Communication Research, 34, 665–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Lo, V.-H., & Lu, H.-Y. (2008). Third-person effects of health news: Exploring the relationships among media exposure, presumed media influence, and behavioral intentions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R., Lo, V.-H., & Lu, H.-Y. (2010). The third-person effect of tainted food product recall news: Examining the role of credibility, attention, and elaboration for college students in Taiwan. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 598–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K., & Morrison, K. (2000). Examining the influence of trait anxiety/repression-sensitization on individuals' reactions to fear appeals. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar