1,807
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

News Coverage of Intimate Partner Violence: Impact on Prosocial Responses

, , &
Pages 451-471 | Received 11 Oct 2013, Accepted 03 Jun 2014, Published online: 28 Jul 2014

REFERENCES

  • American Medical Association. (1992). Violence against women: Relevance for medical practitioners. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3184–3189.
  • Ames, G. M., Cunradi, C. B., Duke, M., Todd, M., & Chen, M. J. (2013). Contributions of work stressors, alcohol, and normative beliefs to intimate partner violence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 74, 195–204.
  • Banyard, V. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of pro-social bystander behavior: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23, 85–99.
  • Banyard, V. L., & Moynihan, M. M. (2011). Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention. Psychology of Violence, 1, 287–301.
  • Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481.
  • Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39.
  • Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, volume 5: Personality and social psychology (pp. 463–484). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Behr, R. L., & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 38–57.
  • Bems, N. (1999). “My problem and how I solved it”: Domestic violence in women's magazines. Sociological Quarterly, 40, 85–108.
  • Benson, M., Fox, G. L., DeMaris, A., & Van Wyk, J. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 207–234.
  • Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., … Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • Breiding, M. J., Black, M. C., & Ryan, G. W. (2008). Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34, 112–118.
  • Brosius, H. B., & Kepplinger, H. M. (1990). The agenda-setting function of television news: Static and dynamic views. Communication Research, 17, 183–211.
  • Brosius, H. B., & Weimann, G. (1996). Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 23, 561–580.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bullock, C. F. (2007). Framing domestic violence fatalities: Coverage by Utah newspapers. Women's Studies in Communication, 30, 34–63.
  • Bullock, C. F., & Cubert, J. (2002). Coverage of domestic violence fatalities by newspapers in Washington state. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 475–499.
  • Campbell, J. C., & Manganello, J. (2006). Changing public attitudes as a prevention strategy to reduce intimate partner violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 13, 13–39.
  • Carll, E. K. (2003). News portrayal of violence and women: Implications for public policy. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1601–1610.
  • Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., Troyer, D., Switzer, G., & Speer, A. L. (1991). The altruistic personality: In what contexts is it apparent? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 450–458.
  • Carlson, B. E., & Worden, A. P. (2001). Public opinion about domestic violence (Grant No. 98-WT-VX-0018). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
  • Carlyle, K. E., Slater, M. D., & Chakroff, J. L. (2008). Newspaper coverage of intimate partner violence: Skewing representations of risk. Journal of Communication, 58, 168–186.
  • Catalano, S. (2012). Intimate partner violence in the United States, 1993–2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bjs.gov/content/intimate/ipv.cfm
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2003). Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • Chaurand, N., & Brauer, M. (2008). What determines social control? People's reactions to counternormative behaviors in urban environment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1689–1715.
  • Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1991). A functional analysis of altruism and prosocial behavior: The case of volunteerism. In M. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 119–148). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Clements, C. B., Brannen, D. N., Kirkley, S. M., Gordon, T. M., & Church, W. T. (2006). The measurement of concern about victims: Empathy, victim advocacy and the Victim Concern Scale (VCS). Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 283–295.
  • Coates, T. (2012, December 1). The killing of Kassandra Perkins by Jovan Belcher. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/12/the-killing-of-kasandra-perkins-by-jovan-belcher/265888/.
  • Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Bethea, L., King, M. R., & McKeown, R. E. (2000). Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 451–457.
  • Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., McKeown, R. E., & King, M. J. (2000). Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: Physical, sexual, and psychological battering. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 553–559.
  • Crowell, N. A., & Burgess, A. W. (1996). Understanding violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Dann, C. (2013, March 7). Obama signs Violence Against Women Act reauthorization. NBC News. Retrieved from http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/07/17226287-obama-signs-violence-against-women-act-reauthorization?lite
  • de Vreese, C. H., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Semetko, H. A. (2011). (In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union. Communication Research, 38, 179–205.
  • Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27, 461–495.
  • Dutton, M. A. (1996). Battered women's strategic response to violence: The role of context. In J. L. Edleson & Z. C. Eisikovits (Eds.), Future interventions with battered women and their families (pp. 105–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Eisenberg, N. (1991). Meta-analytic contributions to the literature on prosocial behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 273–282.
  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 14, 131–149.
  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., Miller, P., Fultz, J., Shell, R., Mathy, R., & Reno, R. (1989). Relation of sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: A multimethod study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 55–66.
  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.
  • Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. N., & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 1, 16–49.
  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
  • Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29, 169–192.
  • Gross, K., & D'Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25, 1–29.
  • Grusec, J. E., Davidov, M., & Lundell, L. (2002). Prosocial and helping behavior. In P. Smith & H. Craig (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood development (pp. 457–474). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Hart, P. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33, 28–51.
  • Heise, L., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2002). Violence by intimate partners. In E. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, & R. Lozano (Eds.), World report on violence and health (pp. 87–121). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  • Helderman, R. S. (2013, February 28). Violence Against Women Act passed by House, sent to Obama for signature. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/violence-against-women-act-passed-by-house-sent-to-obama-for-signature/2013/02/28/c540f058-81b4-11e2-b99e-6baf4ebe42df_story.html?wpisrc=al_politics_p
  • Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In C. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior (pp. 103–131). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
  • Iannotti, R. J. (1985). Naturalistic and structured assessments of prosocial behavior in preschool children: The influence of empathy and perspective taking. Developmental Psychology, 21, 46–55.
  • Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1993). News coverage of the Gulf Crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Communication Research, 20, 365–383.
  • Jacoby, W. G. (2000). Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 750–767.
  • Jasinski, J. L. (2001). Theoretical explanations for violence against women. In C. Renzetti, J. Edleson, & R. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 5–21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Jones, A. S., Gielen, A. C., & Campbell, J. C. (1999). Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees. Women's Health Issues, 9, 295–305.
  • Kim, S. H., Scheufele, D. A., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7–25.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Lamb, S. (1991). Acts without agents: An analysis of linguistic avoidance in journal articles on men who batter women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 250–257.
  • Lamb, S., & Keon, S. (1995). Blaming the perpetrator: Language that distorts reality in newspaper articles on men battering women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 209–220.
  • Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 42–58.
  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Lisak, D., & Miller, P. M. (2002). Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence and Victims, 17, 73–84.
  • Maxwell, K. A., Huxford, J., Borum, C., & Hornik, R. (2000). Covering domestic violence: How the OJ Simpson case shaped reporting of domestic violence in the news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 258–272.
  • McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43, 58–67.
  • Mervosh, S. (2013, March 22). Murder of abused wife devastates family, spurs change in Dallas. The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved from http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/dallas/headlines/20130322-murder-of-abused-wife-devastates-family-spurs-change-in-dallas.ece
  • Meyers, M. (1996). News coverage of violence against women: Engendering blame. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Mitchell, C., & James, L. (2009). Evolving health policy on intimate partner violence. In C. Miller & D. Anglin (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: A health-based perspective (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Kimes, L. A. (1999). The social construction of violence: The case of sexual and domestic violence. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 3, 234–245.
  • Nabi, R. L. (1998). The effect of disgust-eliciting visuals on attitudes toward animal experimentation. Communication Quarterly, 46, 472–484.
  • Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30, 224–247.
  • Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157–164.
  • Oswald, P. A. (1996). The effects of cognitive and affective perspective taking on empathic concern and altruistic helping. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 613–623.
  • Oswald, P. A. (2002). The interactive effects of affective demeanor, cognitive processes, and perspective-taking focus on helping behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 120–132.
  • Page, B., & Shapiro, R. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Palazzolo, K. E., & Roberto, A. J. (2011). Media representations of intimate partner violence and punishment preferences: Exploring the role of attributions and emotions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39, 1–18.
  • Parker, A. (2013, February 28). House renews Violence Against Women Act amid GOP fissures. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/01/us/politics/congress-passes-reauthorization-of-violence-against-women-act.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
  • Plichta, S. B. (2004). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences: Policy and practice implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1296–1323.
  • Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481–506.
  • Roberts, W., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67, 449–470.
  • Saltzman, L. E., Fanslow, J. L., McMahon, P. M., & Shelley, G. A. (1999). Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, Version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297–316.
  • Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.
  • Schwartz, M. D., DeKeseredy, W. S., Tait, D., & Alvi, S. (2001). Male peer support and a feminist routine activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus. Justice Quarterly, 18, 623–649.
  • Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56(2), 235–252.
  • Small, D. A., & Simonsohn, U. (2008). Friends of victims: Personal experience and prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 532–542.
  • Staub, E. (1978). Positive social behavior and morality: Social and personal influences (Vol. 1). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (Research Report, NCJ 183781). Washington, DC, and Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • Toi, M., & Batson, C. D. (1982). Focus of attention mediates the impact of affect on altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 291–300.
  • Troy, T. (2013, March 28). Kaitlin Gerber's parents say legal system let victim down. Toledo Blade. Retrieved from http://www.toledoblade.com/Police-Fire/2013/03/27/Kaitlin-Gerber-s-parents-say-legal-system-let-victim-down.html
  • Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 143–173.
  • Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Sympathy through affective perspective taking and its relation to prosocial behavior in toddlers. Developmental Psychology, 45, 534–543.
  • Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, why, and when. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 435–441.
  • Warshaw, C., Brashler, B., & Gil, J. (2009). Mental health consequences of intimate partner violence. In C. Mitchell & D. Anglin (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: A health based perspective (pp. 147–171). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186–200.
  • Wolfe, D. A., & Jaffe, P. G. (1999). Emerging strategies in the prevention of domestic violence. Future of Children, 9, 133–144.
  • Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., & Brady-Smith, J. (1977). Perspective-taking and prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 13, 87–88.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.