Can't See the Forest for the Trees? The Effect of Media Multitasking on Cognitive Processing Style

REFERENCES

• Alzahabi, R., & Becker, M. W. (2013). The association between media multitasking, task-switching, and dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1485–1495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, G. B., & Chung, L. (2000). Background television and reading memory in context: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes. Communication Research, 27, 327–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 637–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, A., & Gips, J. (2011). Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyneel, S. D., & Dewitte, S. (2012). Engaging in self-regulation results in low-level construals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 763–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108, 847–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011). Distractor filtering in media multitaskers, Perception, 40, 1183–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, L. M., Cheever, N. A., Rosen, L. D., Benitez, S., & Chang, J. (2009). Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 483–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 775, 526–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. Niedenthal & P. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167–196). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dove, A., Pollman, S., Schubert, T., Wiggins, C. J., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: An event related fMRI study. Cognition and Brain Research, 9, 103–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finke, R. A. (1985). Theories relating mental imagery to perception. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 236–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foehr, U. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Foehr, U. G., Rideout, V., & Roberts, D. F. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Foerde, K., Knowlton, B. J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 11778–11783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., & Dannenberg, L. (2010). GLOMOsys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 175–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Kuschel, S. (2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 579–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(6), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper, K. (2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 405–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R., Vohs, K. D., Sellier, A., & Meyvis, T. (2011). Being of two minds: Switching mindsets exhausts self-regulatory resources. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183.
   Google Scholar
• Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15, 46–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., Kim, H., & Jeong, S. H. (2014). Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 542–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S. H., & Fishbein, M. (2007). Predictors of multitasking with media: Media factors and audience factors. Media Psychology, 10, 364–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, T. (2014). Making sense of multitasking: The role of Facebook. Computers & Education, 70, 194–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm. A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimchi, R., & Palmer, S. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 521–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2, 353–383.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L. (2009). Breadth-biased versus focused cognitive control in media multitasking behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15521–15522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, B. C., Rouder, J. N., & Wisniewski, E. J. (1999). A structural account of global and local processing. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 291–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui, K. F., & Wong, A. C. N. (2012). Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 647–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkoc, S. A., Zauberman, G., & Bettman, J. R. (2010). Unstuck from the concrete: Carryover effects of abstract mindsets in intertemporal preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 112–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minear, M., Brasher, F., McCurdy, M., Lewis, J., & Younggren, A. (2013). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1274–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Wizki, A., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I., Perretta, J. G., & Tonev, S. T. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 53, 609–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen. (2011). State of the media 2010: U.S. audiences and devices. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/newswire/uploads/2011/01/nielsen-media-fact-sheet-jan-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ophir, E., Nass, C. I., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15583–15587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pea, R., Nass, C., Meheula, L., Rance, M., Kumar, A., Bamford, H., … & Zhou, M. (2012). Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 48, 327–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilotta, J. J., Schultz, D., & Drenik, G. (2004). Simultaneous media usage: A critical consumer orientation to media planning. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 30, 285–292.
   Google Scholar
• Pool, M. M., Koolstra, C. M., & van der Voort T. H. (2003). Background media and homework performance. Journal of Communication, 53, 74–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. A Kaiser Family Foundation study. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., Knight, S. L., & Kantowitz, B. H. (1977). Inferring decay in short-term memory: The issue of capacity. Memory and Cognition, 5, 167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthruff, E., Pashler, H. E., & Klaassen, A. (2001). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement? Psychological Bulletin and Review, 8, 73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J. M. (2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PloS One, 8(1), e54402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, S. I. (2013). A null relationship between media multitasking and well-being. PloS One, 8(5), e64508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 225–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. J. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they are doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H. (2011). Media multitasking and the effectiveness of combining online and radio advertising, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2200–2206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H. A., & van der Goot, M. (2013). Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, E. W., & Agrawal, N. (2011). Carryover effects of self-control on decision making: A construal-level perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. (2012). The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62, 493–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., David, P., Srivastava, J., Powers, S., Brady, C., D'Angelo, J., & Moreland, J. (2012). Behavioral performance and visual attention in communication multitasking: A comparison between instant messaging and online voice chat. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 968–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, J. Y., & Lim, S. W. H. (2013). Media multitasking predicts unitary versus splitting visual focal attention. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 889–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeykelis, L., Cummings, J. J., & Reeves, B. (2014). Multitasking on a single device: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication, 64, 167–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Zhang, L. (2012). Explicating multitasking with computers: Gratifications and situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1883–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar