Laughing at Risk: Sitcom Laugh Tracks Communicate Norms for Behavior

REFERENCES

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, M., Foehr, U., Rideout, V., Baer, N., Miller, C., Flournoy, R., & Altman, D. (2001). Communicating health information through the entertainment media. Health Affairs, 20, 192–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2012). The focus theory of normative conduct. In P. M. Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, E. T. Higgins, P. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2) (pp. 295–312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audieces with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 24–264.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2002). Deconstructing ally: Explaining viewers’ interpretations of popular television. Media Psychology, 4, 253–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2009). Mediated relationships and media effects: Parasocial interaction and identification. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media processes and effects (pp. 223–236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, D., Kauffman, M., & Bright, K. S. (producers). (1994). Friends [Television series]. Hollywood, CA: Warner Bros. Television.
   Google Scholar
• Dynel, M. (2011). I’ll be there for you: On participation-based sitcom humour. In M. Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humour across discourse domains (pp. 311–333). Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar-Chaves, S. L., & Anderson, C. A. (2008). Media and risky behaviors. The Future of Children, 18, 147–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewoldsen, D.R., Rhodes, N., & Fazio, R. H. (2014). The MODE model and its implications for studying the media. Media Psychology, 18, 312–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, T. E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 79–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1989). An outline of psychoanalysis (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: A synthetic approach. Quarterly Review of Biology, 80, 395–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and parasocial interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iguarta, J. (2010). Identification with character and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 35, 347–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski, M. K. and Rimal, R. N. (2005), An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15, 127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, G. E., & Alderton, D. L. (1990). Reaction time variability and intelligence: A ‘worst performance’ analysis of individual differences. Intelligence, 14, 309–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollen, S., Rimal, R. N., & Lapinski, M. K. (2010). What is normative in health communication research on norms? A review and recommendations for future scholarship. Health Communication, 25, 544–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., Chung, A. H., & Jain, P. (2011). Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health. Journal of Communication, 61, 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., Mahood, C., & Brookes, S. E. (2011). Entertainment-education in the context of humor: Effects on safer sex intentions and risk perceptions. Health Communication, 26, 765–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 26–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (2012). Media effects. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quintero Johnson, J. M., Harrison, K., & Quick, B. L. (2013). Understanding the effectiveness of Cthe entertainment-educations strategy: An investigation of how audience involvement, message processing, and message design influence health information recall. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 160–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real, K., & Rimal, R. N. (2007). Friends talk to friends about drinking: Exploring the role of peer communication in the theory of normative social behavior. Health Communication, 22, 169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, N., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2009). Attitude and norm accessibility and cigarette smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2355–2372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, N., & Pivik, K. (2011). Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 923–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, N., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Edison, A., & Bradford, M. B. (2008). Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages. Health Psychology, 27, S224–S232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. (2008). Modeling the relationship between descriptive norms and behaviors: A test and extension of the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB). Health Communication, 23, 103–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32, 389–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivis, A., Sheeran, P., & Armitage, C. J. (2006). Augmenting the theory of planned behaviour with the prototype/willingness model: Predictive validity of actor versus abstainer prototypes for adolescents’ health-protective and health-risk intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 483–500. doi:10.1348/135910705X7032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, T. S., & Wortzel, L. H. (1978). Consumer behavior and health care change: The role of mass media. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 525–527.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136, 414–429.
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12, 117–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. B. (2007). Meta-analyses of mediated health campaigns. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research (pp. 327–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, E., Peach, J. M., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2012). Not all automatic associations are created equal: How implicit normative evaluations are distinct from implicit attitudes and uniquely predict meaningful behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 694–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar