Nice or Naughty? The Role of Emotions and Digital Media Use in Explaining Adolescents’ Online Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior

REFERENCES

• Ak, Ş., Özdemir, Y., & Kuzucu, Y. (2015). Cybervictimization and cyberbullying: The mediating role of anger, don’t anger me! Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 437–443. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.030
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 17, 319–325. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01705.x
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Handbook of psychology. Part three. Social psychology (pp. 463–484). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. http://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
   Google Scholar
• Bazarova, N. N., Choi, Y. H., Sosik, V. S., Cosley, D., & Whitlock, J. (2015). Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: Channel differences, satisfaction, and replies. In CSCW’15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 154–164). Vancouver, BC, Canada. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675297
   Google Scholar
• Bellur, S., High, A., & Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2008). Misery doesn’t love company: An exploration of emotional bandwidth on online social networks. Presented at the 58th Conference of the International Communication Association, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bierhoff, H. W. (2002). Prosocial behaviour. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosancianu, C. M., Powell, S., & Bratović, E. (2013). Social capital and pro-social behavior online and offline. International Journal of Internet Science, 8, 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Brighi, A., Ortega, R., Pyzalski, J., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. K., Tsormpatzoudis, V., & Barkoukis, V. (2012). European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnarie (ECIPQ). University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Cappadocia, M. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2013). Cyberbullying: Prevalence, stability, and risk factors during adolescence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28, 171–192.
   Google Scholar
• Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1993). Early emotional instability, prosocial behaviour, and aggression: Some methodological aspects. European Journal of Personality, 7, 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31–44. http://doi.org/10.1023/A
   Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Silva, P. A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R. F., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology, 32, 163–196. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01151.x
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Li, D., Li, Z., & Li, Bo-shuLiu, M. (2000). Sociable and prosocial dimensions of social competence in Chinese children: Common and unique contributions to social, academic, and psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 36, 302–314. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.302
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, R. N. H., & Buijzen, M. (2016). Introducing positive media psychology to the field of children, adolescents, and media. Journal of Children and Media, 10, 39–46. http://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1121892
   Google Scholar
• den Hamer, A., Konijn, E. A., & Keijer, M. G. (2014). Cyberbullying behaviors and adolescents’ use of media with antisocial content: A cyclic process model. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17(2), 74–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0307
   Google Scholar
• Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 766–785. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Dolev-Cohen, M., & Barak, A. (2013). Adolescents’ use of Instant Messaging as a means of emotional relief. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 58–63. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.016
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N. (2015). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, 6th ed., pp. 646–718). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• EU Kids Online. (2014). Findings, methods, recommendations. EU Kids Online, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior. I: The role of individual processes. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 5–16. http://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019001001
   Google Scholar
• Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23, 295–302. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429709
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (2004). Emotions and action. In Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gámez-Guadix, M. (2014). Depressive symptoms and problematic Internet use among adolescents: Analysis of the longitudinal relationships from the cognitive–behavioral model. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 714–719. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0226
   Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer, T., & Mügge, D. O. (2014). Video games do affect social outcomes: A meta-analytic review of the effects of violent and prosocial video game play. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 578–589. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213520459
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, M. P., Newton, A. S., Chisholm, A., Shulhan, J., Milne, A., Sundar, P.,…Hartling, L. (2015). Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and young people. JAMA Pediatrics. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0944
   Google Scholar
• Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 351–354. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059
   Google Scholar
• Karremans, J. C. (2005). Forgiveness and its associations with prosocial thinking, feeling, and doing beyond the relationship with the offender. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1315–1326. http://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205274892
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
   Google Scholar
• Leung, L. (2007). Stressful life events, motives for Internet use, and social support among digital kids. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 204–214. http://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9967
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU Kids Online: Final report 2009. EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24372/
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). EU Kids Online II final report. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39351/
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media & Society, 12, 309–329. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342697
   Google Scholar
• Lonigro, A., Schneider, B. H., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., Pallini, S., & Brunner, T. (2015). Is cyberbullying related to trait or state anger? Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46, 445–454. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-014-0484-0
   Google Scholar
• Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2014). Net children go mobile: Cross-national comparisons. Milano, Italy: Educatt.
   Google Scholar
• Meter, D. J., & Bauman, S. (2015). When sharing is a bad idea: The effects of online social network engagement and sharing passwords with friends on cyberbullying involvement. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 437–442. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0081
   Google Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (2010). Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602–611. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2011). Mplus user’ s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2015). (Cyber)bullying perpetration as an impulsive angry reaction following (cyber)bullying victimization? In M. Walrave, K. Ponnet, E. Vanderhoven, J. Haers, & B. Segaert (Eds.), Youth 2.0: Social media and adolescence-Connecting, sharing and empowering. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B., & Ramsey, E. (1990). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinstein, M., & Cillessen, A. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342. http://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2003.0015
   Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A. K., Deci, E. L., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Competence-impeding electronic games and players’ aggressive feelings, thoughts, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 441–457. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0034820
   Google Scholar
• Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1, 60–85. http://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908097189
   Google Scholar
• Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Göbel, K., Scheithauer, H., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Tsorbatzoudis, H.,…Smith, P. K. (2014). A comparison of classification approaches for cyberbullying and traditional bullying using data from six European countries. Journal of School Violence, 14, 47–65. http://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.961067
   Google Scholar
• Staksrud, E., & Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk: Powerless victims or resourceful participants? Information, Communication & Society, 12, 364–387. http://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802635455
   Google Scholar
• Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321–326. http://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
   Google Scholar
• Tsitsika, A., Janikian, M., Wójcik, S., Makaruk, K., Tzavela, E., Tzavara, C.,…Richardson, C. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization prevalence and associations with internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents in six European countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.048
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267–277. http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet: Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Research, 35, 208–231. http://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207313164
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x
   Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16, 507–526. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
   Google Scholar
• Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11, 1349–1371. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341263
   Google Scholar
• Vandoninck, S., D’Haenens, L., & Donoso, V. (2010). Digital literacy of Flemish youth: How do they handle online content risks? Communications, 35, 397–416. http://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2010.021
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, R. (2006). The development of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: Prosocial and antisocial behavior in adolescence. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 93–108). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science+Business.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-C., & Wang, C.-H. (2008). Helping others in online games: Prosocial behavior in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 344–346. http://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0045
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K., & Mcnamara, C. (1999). Interpersonal relationships, emotional distress, and prosocial behavior in middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 114–125. http://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019001006
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, J. L., & Bushman, B. J. (2009). Online dangers: Keeping children and adolescents safe. Washington and Lee Law Review, 66, 1053–1063.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, H., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Beech, A., & Collings, G. (2013a). A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 62–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, H., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Beech, A., & Collings, G. (2013b). A review of young people’s vulnerabilities to online grooming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 135–146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. F. (2014). Longitudinal investigation of the associations between adolescents’ popularity and cyber social behaviors. Journal of School Violence, 13, 291–314. http://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2013.849201
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2011). The associations between young adults’ face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1959–1962. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.019
   Google Scholar
• Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13, 803–810. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0033839
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206. http://doi.org/10.1086/651257
   Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management through communication choices. The American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 327–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar