Does Repeated Exposure to Popular Media Strengthen Moral Intuitions?: Exploratory Evidence Regarding Consistent and Conflicted Moral Content

REFERENCES

• Arendt, F. (2013). Dose-dependent media priming effects of stereotypic newspaper articles on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Communication, 63, 830–851. doi:10.1111/jcom.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory goes global. Psychologist, 22, 504–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, H. (2011). The complicated relationship between media and morality: A response to Ron Tamborini’s model of “Moral Intuition and Media Entertainment,” from a narrative perspective. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23, 46–51. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000032
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2011). The chain of being a hierarchy of morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 428–444. doi:10.1177/1745691611414587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A. (1993). Bullets, buddies, and bad guys: The “action-cop” genre. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 21, 79–87. doi:10.1080/01956051.1993.9944235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, C. D., Lindquist, K. A., & Gray, K. (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 371–394. doi:10.1177/1088868314566683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, A., Oliver, M. B., Tamborini, R., Limperos, A., & Woolley, J. (2015). Perceptions of moral violations and personality traits among heroes and villains. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 186–208. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.923462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, A., Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., Lewis, R., Weber, R., & Prabhu, S. (2014). Repeated exposure to narrative entertainment and the salience of moral intuitions. Journal of Communication, 64, 501–520. doi:10.1111/jcom.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossum, B., Arborelius, E., & Bremberg, S. (2004). Evaluation of a counseling method for the prevention of child exposure to tobacco smoke: An example of client-centered communication. Preventive Medicine, 38, 295–301. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. C. (2013). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (2015). Explaining away differences in moral judgment: Comment on Gray and Keeney (2015). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 869–873. doi:10.1177/1948550615592242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A., (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. doi:10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., & Keeney, J. E. (2015a). Impure or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 859–868. doi:10.1177/1948550615592241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., & Keeney, J. E. (2015b). Disconfirming moral foundations theory on its own terms: Reply to Graham (2015). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 874–877. doi:10.1177/1948550615592243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzard, M., Lewis, R. J., Lee, S. A., & Eden, A. (2011). Predicting popularity of mass market films using the tenets of disposition theory. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4, 48–60. doi:10.1504/IJART.2011.037769
   Google Scholar
• Grizzard, M., Tamborini, R., Lewis, R. J., Wang, L., & Prabhu, S. (2014). Being bad in a video game can make us morally sensitive. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 499–504. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stitch (Eds). The innate mind: Vol. 3 (pp. 367–392). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., Krakowiak K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, K., (2014). How violent video games communicate violence: A literature review and content analysis of moral disengagement factors. Communication Monographs, 81, 310–332. doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.922206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, M., & Wirth, W. (2012). It’s right to be sad: The role of meta-appraisals in the sad-film paradox—A multiple mediator model. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 24, 43–54. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000061
   Google Scholar
• Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PloS one, 7(8), e42366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joeckel, S., Bowman, N.D., & Dogruel, L. (2012). Gut or game? The influence of moral intuitions on decisions in video games. Media Psychology, 15, 460–485. doi:10.1080/15213269.2012.727218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. R., & Holmes, B. M. (2009). Contradictory messages: A content analysis of Hollywood-produced romantic comedy feature films. Communication Quarterly, 57, 352–373. doi:10.1080/01463370903113632
   Google Scholar
• Klimmt, C., Schmid, H., Nosper, A., Hartmann, T., & Vorderer, P.A. (2006). Moral management: Dealing with moral concerns to maintain enjoyment of violent video games. In A. Sudmann-Jahn & R. Stockmann (Eds.), Computer games as a sociocultural phenomenon: Games without frontiers—Wars without tears (pp. 108–118). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Krakowiak, K. M. & Oliver, M. B. (2012). When good characters do bad things: Examining the effect of moral ambiguity on enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62, 117–135. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakowiak, K. M. & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2013). What makes characters’ bad behaviors acceptable? The effects of character motivation and outcome on perceptions, character liking, and moral disengagement. Mass Communication and Society, 16, 179–199. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.690926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, R. (2009). The contributions of positive and negative affect to emotional well-being. Psychological Topics, 18, 247–266.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. K., & Shapiro, M. A. (2014). The interaction of affective dispositions, moral judgments, and intentionality in assessing narrative characters: Rationalist and intuitionist sequences. Communication Theory, 24, 146–164. doi:10.1111/comt.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. J., & Mitchell, N. (2014). Egoism versus altruism in television content for young audiences. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 597–613. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.816747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. J., Tamborini, R., & Weber, R. (2014). Testing a dual-process model of media enjoyment and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 64, 397–416. doi:10.1111/jcom.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonell, M. G., Short, R. A., Berry, C. M., & Dyck, D. G. (2003). Burden in schizophrenia caregivers: impact of family psychoeducation and awareness of patient suicidality. Family Process, 42, 9–103. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00091.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metacritic. (n.d.). How we create the Metascore magic. Retrieved from http://www.metacritic.com/about-metascores.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23, 29–33. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000029
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Kalyanaraman, S. (2002). Appropriate for all viewing audiences? An examination of violent and sexual portrayals in movie previews featured on video rentals. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 283–299. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4602_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2002). Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 3–16. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A. (2005). Punishing media criminals and moral judgment: The impact on enjoyment. Media Psychology, 7, 145–163. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A. (2006). The psychology of disposition-based theories of media enjoyment. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 137–150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (1996). Attitude accessibility and persuasion: Review and a transactive model. In. B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 20, pp. 185–225). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2009). Current research in media priming. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 177–192). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmack, U. (2014). Quantifying statistical research integrity: The Replicability-Index. Retrieved from http://www.r-index.org
   Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D. (2015). p-checker: One-for-all p-value analyzer. Retrieved from http://shinyapps.org/apps/p-checker/
   Google Scholar
• Shrum, L. J. (2009). Television viewing and social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In M. Wänke (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 251–272). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R. (2011). Moral intuition and media entertainment. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(1), 39–45. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000031
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R. (2013). A model of intuitive morality and exemplars. In R. Tamborini (Ed.), Media and the moral mind (pp. 43–74). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Eden, A., Bowman, N. D., Grizzard, M. and Lachlan, K. A. (2012). The influence of morality subcultures on the acceptance and appeal of violence. Journal of Communication, 62, 136–157. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01620.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Eden, A., Bowman, N.D., Grizzard, M., Weber, R., & Lewis, R.J. (2013). Predicting media appeal from instinctive moral values. Mass Communication and Society, 16, 325–346. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.703285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Hahn, L., Prabhu, S., Klebig, B., & Grall, C. (in press). The representation of altruistic and egoistic motivations in children’s television programming. Communication Research Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Lewis, R. J., Prabhu, S., Grizzard, M., Hahn, L., & Wang, L. (2016). Media’s influence on the accessibility of altruistic and egoistic motivations. Communication Research Reports, 33, 177–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1186627
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Prabhu, S., Lewis, R. J., Grizzard, M., & Eden, A. (2016). The influence of media exposure on the accessibility of moral intuitions and associated affect. Journal of Media Psychology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000183
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Weber, R., Eden, A., Bowman, N. D., & Grizzard, M. (2010). Repeated exposure to daytime soap opera and shifts in moral judgment toward social convention. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 621–640. doi:10.1080/08838151.2010.519806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, A. J., & Lewis, N. (2012). Mirrored morality: An exploration of moral choice in video games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 610–614. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R., Tamborini, R., Lee, H. E., & Stipp, H. (2008). Soap opera exposure and enjoyment: A longitudinal test of disposition theory. Media Psychology, 11, 46–487. doi:10.1080/15213260802509993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1976). A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 93–115). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar