Decision-making about broad- and narrowcasting: a neuroscientific perspective

References

• Archer, R. L., & Earle, W. B. (1983). The interpersonal orientations of disclosure. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 289–314). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5578-9_12
   Google Scholar
• Baek, E. C., Scholz, C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Falk, E. B. (2017). The value of sharing information: A neural account of information transmission. Psychological Science, 28(7), 851–861. doi:10.1177/0956797617695073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barasch, A., & Berger, J. (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286–299. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Williams, E. L. (2006). The automaticity of social life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(1), 1–4. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00395.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazarova, N. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 815–832. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 635–657. doi:10.1111/jcom.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., & Karrer, B. (2013). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 21–30). ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2470658
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, I. (1991). Pouring new wine into old bottles: The social self as internal working model. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development (pp. 1–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, M., Anton, J.-L., & Valabregue, J.-B. P. (2002). Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract]. Presented at the 8th International Conferance on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2–6, 2002, Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-ROM in NeuroImage, Vol 16, No 2, abstract 497. Retrieved from http://matthew.dynevor.org/research/abstracts/marsbar/marsbar_abstract.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhle, J. T., Silvers, J. A., Wager, T. D., Lopez, R., Onyemekwu, C., Kober, H., … Ochsner, K. N. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: A meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 24(11), 2981–2990. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., Kim, H. S., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: Psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychology, 18, 396–424. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.941112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. Advances in Psychology, 9, 287–299. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60059-5
   Google Scholar
• Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29(3), 162–173. doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M. (2012). Social networking and impression management: Self-presentation in the digital age. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, A. M., Greve, D. N., & Burock, M. A. (1999). Optimal stimulus sequences for event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 9, S33–S33.
   Google Scholar
• Derlega, V. J., & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In G. J. Chelune (Eds.), Self-discloure: Origins, patterns, and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships (pp. 151–176). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dietvorst, R. C., Verbeke, W. J. M., Bagozzi, R. P., Yoon, C., Smits, M., & van der Lugt, A. (2009). A sales force–Specific theory-of-mind scale: Tests of its validity by classical methods and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5), 653–668. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.5.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doré, B. P., Scholz. C., Baek, E. C., Garcia, J. O., O’Donnell, M. B., Bassett, D. S., Vettel, J. M., & Falk E. B. (2018). Brain Activity Tracks Population Information Sharing by Capturing Consensus Judgments of Value. Cerebral Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy176
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, N., Redcay, E., Young, L., Mavros, P. L., Moran, J. M., Triantafyllou, C., … Saxe, R. (2013). Similar brain activation during false belief tasks in a large sample of adults with and without autism. PLoS One, 8(9), e75468. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. I., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. D. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8(3), 231–246. doi:10.1007/BF02912493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Boven, L. V., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2001). Egocentric empathy gaps in social interaction and exchange. In Advances in group processes (Vol. 18, pp. 65–97). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1016/S0882-6145(01)18004-5
   Google Scholar
• Emler, N. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 171–193. doi:10.1080/14792779108401861
   Google Scholar
• Falk, E. B., Morelli, S. A., Welborn, B. L., Dambacher, K., & Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Creating buzz: The neural correlates of effective message propagation. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1234–1242. doi:10.1177/0956797612474670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, E. B., & Scholz, C. (2018). Persuasion, influence, and value: Perspectives from communication and social neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 329–356. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011821
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531–534. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, S., Valenti, J., & Young, A. F. (2016). Chapter Four - Social surrogates, social motivations, and everyday activities: The case for a strong, subtle, and sneaky social self. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 53, pp. 189–243). Academic Press. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self disclsoure in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisiti & D. Perlmans (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409–427) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://himaforstaunair.url.ph/soal/Self%20Disclsoure%20in%20Personal%20Relationships%20copy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 377–386. doi:10.1177/0270467610385893
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L. C., Bazarova, N. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). The disclosure–intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 58–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashian, N., Jang, J., Shin, S. Y., Dai, Y., & Walther, J. B. (2017). Self-disclosure and liking in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 275–283. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. S. (2015). Attracting views and going viral: How message features and news-sharing channels affect health news diffusion. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 512–534. doi:10.1111/jcom.12160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, N. C., & Haferkamp, N. (2011). Online self-presentation: Balancing privacy concerns and impression construction on social networking sites. In Privacy online (pp. 127–141). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_10
   Google Scholar
• Landis, M. H., & Burtt, H. E. (1924). A study of conversations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4(1), 81–89. doi:10.1037/h0071502
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior (Vol. 15). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect (1st ed.). New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnifico, A. M. (2010). Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer’s audience. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 167–184. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.493470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marder, B., Joinson, A., Shankar, A., & Thirlaway, K. (2016). Strength matters: Self-presentation to the strongest audience rather than lowest common denominator when faced with multiple audiences in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars, R. B., Neubert, F.-X., Noonan, M. P., Sallet, J., Toni, I., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2012). On the relationship between the “default mode network” and the “social brain.”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshi, D., Tamir, D. I., & Heekeren, H. R. (2015). The emerging neuroscience of social media. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 771–782. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. C., & Read, S. J. (1987). Why am I telling you this? Self-disclosure in a goal-based model of personality. In V. J. Derlega & J. H. Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 35–58). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R. J., Schaer, M., & Debbané, M. (2012). Degrees of separation: A quantitative neuroimaging meta-analysis investigating self-specificity and shared neural activation between self- and other-reflection. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(3), 1043–1059. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C.-H. (2010). Is it really about me?: Message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 189–192). ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1718953
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M., Bin, Y. S., & Campbell, A. (2012). Comparing online and offline self-disclosure: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 103–111. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M., & Sigmund, K. (2000). Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science, 289(5485), 1773–1775. doi:10.1126/science.289.5485.1773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omarzu, J. (2000). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 174–185. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 59–63. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-Project.Org
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: Personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01560.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 322–336. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2008). Minds at rest? Social cognition as the default mode of cognizing and its putative relationship to the “default system” of the brain. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 457–467. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Falk, E. B. (2015). Social networks and neural mechanisms of communication. Open Science Framework. Retrieved from https://osf.io/a8xme
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, C., Baek, E. C., O’Donnell, M. B., Kim, H. S., Cappella, J. N., & Falk, E. B. (2017). A neural model of valuation and information virality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(11), 2881–2886. doi:10.1073/pnas.1615259114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2014, February 3). 6 new facts about Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/03/6-new-facts-about-facebook/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E., Johansen-Berg, H., … Matthews, P. M. (2004). Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage, 23, S208–S219. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. N. (2008). The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: A quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 489–510. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steijn, W. M. P., & Schouten, A. P. (2013). Information sharing and relationships on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(8), 582–587. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, D. I., & Mitchell, J. P. (2012). Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(21), 8038–8043. doi:10.1073/pnas.1202129109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2008). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451–470. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., & Reading, S. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 22(4), 1679–1693. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communciation research: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. doi:10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1978). The accuracy of verbal reports about the effects of stimuli on evaluations and behavior. Social Psychology, 41(2), 118–131. doi:10.2307/3033572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nature Methods, 8(8), 665–670. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar