Event related message processing: perceiving and remembering changes in films with and without soundtrack

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.7.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baguley, T. (2012). Calculating and graphing within-subject confidence intervals for ANOVA. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 158–175. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0123-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. J., & Levin, D. T. (2015). The role of relational triggers in event perception. Cognition, 136, 14–29. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltz, M. (1992). Temporal accent structure and the remembering of filmed narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D. (2002). Intensified continuity visual style in contemporary American film. Film Quarterly, 55(3), 16–28. doi:10.1525/fq.2002.55.3.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (1990). Film art: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cutting, J. E., Brunick, K. L., & Candan, A. (2012). Perceiving event dynamics and parsing Hollywood films. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1–15. doi:10.1037/a0027737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, J. E., DeLong, J. E., & Brunick, K. L. (2011). Visual activity in Hollywood film: 1935 to 2005 and beyond. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 115. doi:10.1037/a0020995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Ydewalle, G., & Vanderbeeken, M. (1990). Perceptual and cognitive processing of editing rules in film. In R. Groner, G. D’Ydewalle, & R. Parnham (Eds.), From eye to mind: Information acquisition in perception, search and reading (pp. 129–139). Amsterdam: Elsevier (North Holland).
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germeys, F., & D’Ydewalle, G. (2007). The psychology of film: Perceiving beyond the cut. Psychological Research, 71(4), 458–466. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0025-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1976). Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? Psychological Bulletin, 83, 314–320. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.2.314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haist, F., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1992). On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(4), 691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, C., & Hirst, W. (1989). On the representation of events: A study of orientation, recall, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(2), 136. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1996). The perception of motion pictures. In M. P. Friedman & E. C. Carterette (Eds.), Cognitive ecology (pp. 205–292). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, M, Maurer, A. E, Brich, I, Pagenkopf, A, Wickelmaier, F, & Papenmeier, F. (2018a). Construction and updating of event models in auditory event processing. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 307–320. doi:10.1037/xlm0000482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M, Meitz, T G. K, & Papenmeier, F. (2014). Changes in situation models modulate processes of event perception in audiovisual narratives. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1377–1388. doi:10.1037/a0036780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M, Papenmeier, F, & Zacks, J. M. (2012). Visual target detection is impaired at event boundaries. Visual Cognition, 20(7), 848–864. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.705359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, M, & Schwan, S. (2012). Do not cross the line: heuristic spatial updating in dynamic scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1065–1072. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0293-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.9.2) [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (1995). Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited- capacity information processing perspective. Communication Research, 22, 86–115. doi:10.1177/009365095022001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2006a). Motivated cognition (LC4MP): The influence of appetitive and aversive activation on the processing of video games. In P. Messarsis & L. Humphries (Eds.), Digital media: Transformation in human communication (pp. 237–256). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2006b). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–S80. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Gao, Y., Potter, R. F., Lee, S., Park, B., & Bailey, R. L. (2015). Conceptualizing audio message complexity as available processing resources. Communication Research, 42(6), 759–778. doi:10.1177/0093650213490722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Park, B., Sanders-Jackson, A. N., Wilson, B. D., & Wang, Z. (2007). Cognition and emotion in tv message processing: how valence, arousing content, structural complexity, and information density affect the availability of cognitive resources. Media Psychology, 10(3), 317–338. doi: 10.1080/15213260701532880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (1999). Something for nothing: Is visual encoding automatic? Media Psychology, 1(2), 145–164. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0102_4
   Google Scholar
• Levin, D. T., & Varakin, D. A. (2004). No pause for a brief disruption: Failures of visual awareness during ongoing events. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(2), 363–372. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2003.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1489–1517. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01202.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, W. J., Benjamin, C., & Osborne, C. (2007). Memory for moving and static images. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 989–993. doi:10.3758/BF03194133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H. S, & Huff, M. (2016). Semantic congruency but not temporal synchrony enhances long-term memory performance for audio-visual scenes. Memory & Cognition, 44(3), 390–402. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0575-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, H.S, & Suzuki, S. (2018b). Beep. Be-, or –Ep: The Impact Of Auditory Transients on Perceived Bouncing/streaming. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(12), 1995-2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs. R package  version 0.9.12-4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor.
   Google Scholar
• Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28–38. doi:10.1037/h0035584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436–450. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(76)90076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papenmeier, F. (2014). segmag: determine event boundaries in event segmentation experiments (Version 1.2.2). Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/segmag/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2008). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2. doi:10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., & Lang, A. (2018). Audio message complexity: audio content change (Acc) and audio information introduced (Aii). In D. L. Worthington & G. D. Bodie (Eds.), The sourcebook of listening research: Methodology and measures (Vol. 1, pp. 198–203). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., Lang, A., & Bolls, P. D. (2008). Identifying structural features of audio: Orienting responses during radio messages and their impact on recognition. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20, 168–177. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.20.4.168
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., Lynch, T., & Kraus, A. (2015). I’ve heard that before: Habituation of the orienting response follows repeated presentation of auditory structural features in radio. Communication Monographs, 82, 359–378. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1019529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J. (Producer), & Smith, P. (Director). (1987). A Perfect Spy [Motion Picture]. UK: BBC.
   Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 356–374. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, T., & Fachner, J. (2014). Listening to music reduces eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1–9. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0777-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapiro, A. C., Rogers, T. T., Cordova, N. I., Turk-Browne, N. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2013). Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 486–492. doi:10.1038/nn.3331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, J. (1990). Die psychologische Realität von Prinzipien des Continuity Cinema [The psychological reality of principles in continuity cinema]. In G. Schumm & H. J. Wulff (Eds.), Film und Psychologie I. Kognition—Rezeption—Perzeption [Film and Psychology. Cognition, Reception, Perception] (pp. 109–142). Münster, Germany: Maks Publikationen.
   Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., Garsoffky, B., & Hesse, F. W. (2000). Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activity sequences? Memory & Cognition, 28(2), 214–223. doi:10.3758/BF03213801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., Hesse, F. W., & Garsoffky, B. (1998). The relationship between formal filmic means and the segmentation behavior of film viewers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, 237. doi:10.1080/08838159809364446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. J. (2012). The attentional theory of cinematic continuity. Projections, 6(1), 1–27. doi:10.3167/proj.2012.060102
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Edit blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. J., Levin, D., & Cutting, J. E. (2012). A window on reality perceiving edited moving images. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 107–113. doi:10.1177/0963721412437407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. J., & Martin-Portugues Santacreu, J. Y. (2016). Match-action: The role of motion and audio in creating global change blindness in film. Media Psychology, 20(2), 317–348. doi:10.1080/15213269.2016.1160789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 236–257. doi:10.1037/a0015631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Burg, E., Olivers, C. N. L., Bronkhorst, A. W., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Pip and pop: Nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1053–1065. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yegiyan, N. S., & Lang, A. (2010). Processing central and peripheral detail: how content arousal and emotional tone influence encoding. Media Psychology, 13(1), 77–99. doi:10.1080/15213260903563014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28, 979–1008. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2806_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Kumar, S., Abrams, R. A., & Mehta, R. (2009). Using movement and intentions to understand human activity. Cognition, 112, 201–216. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Kurby, C. A., Eisenberg, M. L., & Haroutunian, N. (2011). Prediction error associated with the perceptual segmentation of naturalistic events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 4057–4066. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 307–327. doi:10.1037/a0015305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 273–293. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, H., Müller, H., & Shi, Z. (2012). Non-spatial sounds regulate eye movements and enhance visual search. Journal of Vision, 12, 1–18. doi:10.1167/12.5.2.Introduction
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar