Linking Epistemic Monitoring to Perceived Realism: the Impact of Story-World Inconsistency on Realism and Engagement

References

• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, M., & Maleckar, B. (2012). The influence of paratext on narrative persuasion: Fact, fiction, or fake? Human Communication Research, 38(4), 459–484. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avraamides, M. N., Galati, A., Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Denis, M. (2013). Encoding and updating spatial information presented in narratives. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(4), 642–670. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.712147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, H. R., & Zacks, J. M. (2015, May 4). Situation model updating in young and older adults: Global versus incremental mechanisms. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 232–244. doi:10.1037/a0039081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2011). Enjoyment of films as a function of narrative experience, perceived realism, and transportability. Communications, 36(1), 29–50. doi:10.1515/comm.2011.002
   Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2017). Beyond metaphors and traditions: Exploring the conceptual boundaries of narrative engagment. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, and M. M. Boicaru (Eds.), Narrative absorption (pp. 11–27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. h ttps://d oi10. 1075/lal. 27.02bil
   Google Scholar
• Brosch, R. (2018). What we ‘see’ when we read: Visualization and vividness in reading fictional narratives. Cortex, 105, 135–143. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle R and Bilandzic H. (2008). Fictionality and Perceived Realism in Experiencing Stories: A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Engagement. Commun Theory, 18(2), 255–280. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle R and Bilandzic H. (2009). Measuring Narrative Engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. 10.1080/15213260903287259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R. W., & Greenberg, B. S. (2000). The nature of television realism judgments: A reevaluation of their conceptualization and measurement. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2–3), 249–268. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_05
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H., Shen, L., & Wilson, K. M. (2013). What makes a message real? The effects of perceived realism of alcohol- and drug-related messages on personal probability estimation. Substance Use & Misuse, 48(4), 323–331. doi:10.3109/10826084.2012.762528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., Shen, L., & Wilson, K. M. (2014). Perceived realism: Dimensions and roles in narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 41(6), 828–851. doi:10.1177/0093650212450585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curiel, J. M., & Radvansky, G. A. (2014). Spatial and character situation model updating. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 205–212. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.879590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziak J Joseph, Dierker L C and Abar B. (2020). The interpretation of statistical power after the data have been gathered. Curr Psychol, 39(3), 870–877. 10.1007/s12144-018-0018-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2013). The role of character-based knowledge in online narrative comprehension: Evidence from eye-movements and ERPs. Brain Research, 1506, 94–104. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Olde, B., & Klettke, B. (2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories? In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 229–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247–266. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall A. (2009). Perceptions of the Authenticity of Reality Programs and Their Relationships to Audience Involvement, Enjoyment, and Perceived Learning. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 515–531. 10.1080/08838150903310468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. (2003). Reading realism: Audiences’ evaluations of the reality of media texts. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 624–641. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby, A., Shawver, Z., & Moreau, P. (2020). How character goal pursuit “moves” audiences to share meaningful stories. Media Psychology, 23(3), 317–341. doi:10.1080/15213269.2019.16011569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Andrew 2013 Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (New York, NY: Guilford Press)
   Google Scholar
• Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2014). Comprehension and validation: Separable stages of information processing? A case for epistemic monitoring in language comprehension. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 245–276). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isberner, M., & Richter, T. (2013). Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji Q, and Raney A A (2016) . Examining Suspension of Disbelief, Perceived Realism, and Involvement in the Enjoyment of Documentary-Style Fictional Films. Projections, 10(2), 10.3167/proj.2016.100207
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inferences, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., & Christodoulou, J. A. (2019). Automaticity and control: How do executive function and reading fluency interact to predict reading comprehension? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 147–166. h ttps://D oi:10. 1002/r rq.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. doi:10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui
   Google Scholar
• McAvinue, L. P., & Robertson, I. H. (2007). Measuring motor imagery ability: A review. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 232–251. doi:10.1080/09541440701394624
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51 (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 297–384). doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2
   Google Scholar
• Preacher K J and Hayes A F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. 10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quintero Johnson, J. M., & Sangalang, A. (2017). Testing the explanatory power of two measures of narrative involvement: An investigation of the influence of transportation and narrative engagement on the process of narrative persuasion. Media Psychology, 20(1), 144–173. doi:10.1080/15213269.2016.1160788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers’ trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 737–750. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Singer, M. (2018). Discourse updating: Acquiring and revising knowledge through discourse. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, and M. A. Britt (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (2nd ed., pp. 167–190). Oxfordshire, England, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rinck, M., Gámez, E., Díaz, J. M., & de Vega, M. (2003). Processing of temporal information: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 77–86. doi:10.3758/BF03196084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinck, M., Hähnel, A., & Becker, G. (2001). Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieve situation models of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27(1), 67–80. h ttps ://d oi.10.1037 //0278 -7393. 27.1. 67
   Google Scholar
• Rinck, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Who when where: An experimental test of the event-indexing model. Memory & Cognition, 31(8), 1284–1292. doi:10.3758/BF03195811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinck, M. (2005). Spatial situation models. In P. Shah, and A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visiospatial thinking (pp. 334–382). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, E. M. (1995). A cognitive-phenomenological theory of fictional narrative. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 61–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro M A, Barriga C A and Beren J. (2010). Causal Attribution and Perceived Realism of Stories. Media Psychology, 13(3), 273–300. 10.1080/15213269.2010.502874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A., & Chock, T. M. (2004). Media dependency and perceived reality of fiction and news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 675–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A., & Fox, J. R. (2002). The role of typical and atypical events in story memory. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 109–135. http://dx.doi.org.edu/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00800.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A., & Kim, H. (2012). Realism judgments and mental resources: A cue processing model of media narrative realism. Media Psychology, 15(1), 93–119. doi:10.1080/15213269.2011.649666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M, and Chock, M 2003 Pyschological Processes in Perceiving Reality Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 5 163–198 doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0502_3
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 574–591. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukalla, F., Bilandzic, H., Bolls, P. D., & Busselle, R. (2016). Embodiment of narrative engagement. Connecting self-reported narrative engagement to psychophysiological measures. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(4), 175–186. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiede, K. E., & Appel, M. (2020). Reviews, expectations, and the experience of stories. Media Psychology, 23(3), 365–390. doi:10.1080/15213269.2019.1602055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, L., Van Den Putte, B., Renes, R. J., & Leeuwis, C. (2017). Do narrative engagement and recipients’ thoughts explain the impact of an entertainment-education narrative on discouraging binge drinking? Media Psychology, 20(2), 194–220. doi:10.1080/15213269.2016.1142379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, P., & Wirth, W. (2014). When and how narratives persuade: The role of suspension of disbelief in didactic versus hedonic processing of a candidate film. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 125–144. doi:10.1111/jcom.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., & Mast, F. (2011). Influence of mental imagery on spatial presence and enjoyment assessed in different types of media. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(10), 607–612. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. (2013). An empirical study of narrative imagery in implicit and explicit contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1580–1589. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., & Xue, J. (2014). Distinguishing different fictional worlds during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence. Psychophysiology, 51(1), 42–51. doi:10.1111/psyp.12149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan K and Maxwell S. (2005). On the Post Hoc Power in Testing Mean Differences. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(2), 141–167. 10.3102/10769986030002141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 138(2), 307–327. h ttp://D oi:10. 1037/ a0015305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3–21. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Madden, C. J., & Whitten, S. N. (2000). The presence of an event in the narrated situation affects its availability in the comprehender. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 1022–1028. doi:10.3758/BF03209350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 386–397. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 196–1207. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Time in language, situation models, and mental simulation. Language Learning, 58(Suppl. 1), 13–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00458.x
   Google Scholar