Monitoring Changes in Effective Population Size during Pond Culture of Red Drum

REFERENCES

• Anderson, J. D., and P. D. Cason. 2015. Density-dependent effects on growth rate and condition factor in Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) stock enhancement rearing ponds. North American Journal of Aquaculture 77:491–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankenship, H. L., and K. M. Leber. 1995. A responsible approach to marine stock enhancement. Pages 167–175 in H. L. Schramm Jr. and R. G. Piper, editors. Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Botstein, D., R. L. White, M. Skolnick, and R. W. Davis. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32:314–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, E. W., S. Karlsson, E. Saillant, and J. R. Gold. 2009. Genetic studies of hatchery-supplemented populations of Red Drum in four Texas bays. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:1502–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cason, P. D., and J. D. Anderson. 2015. A multivariate assessment of factors influencing survival of Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in earthen outdoor rearing ponds. North American Journal of Aquaculture 77:141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, M. R., M. L. Marine, R. A. French, R. S. Waples, and M. S. Blouin. 2012. Effective size of a wild salmonid population is greatly reduced by hatchery supplementation. Heredity 109:254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1973. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, J. R., L. Ma, E. Saillant, P. S. Silva, and R. R. Vega. 2008. Genetic effective size in populations of hatchery-raised Red Drum released for stock enhancement. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137:1327–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, J. R., M. A. Renshaw, E. Saillant, and R. R. Vega. 2010. Spawning frequency of brood dams and sires in a marine fish stock-enhancement hatchery. Journal of Fish Biology 77:1030–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, S., E. Saillant, B. W. Bumguardner, R. R. Vega, and J. R. Gold. 2008. Genetic identification of hatchery-released Red Drum in Texas bays and estuaries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:1294–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. D., and M. R. Fisher. 1998. Temperature and pH-related mortality of Red Drum larvae in fertilized culture ponds. Progressive Fish-Culturist 60:227–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. B. Kruuk, and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7:639–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlock, G. C. 1987. The role of hurricanes in determining year-class strength of Red Drum. Contributions in Marine Science 30:39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, C. E. 1990. Design and operation of a photoperiod/temperature spawning system for Red Drum. Pages 44–45 in G. W. Chamberlain, R. J. Miget, and G. Haby, editors. Red Drum Aquaculture. Texas A&M University Sea Grant College Program, TAMU-SG-90-603, College Station.
   Google Scholar
• McEachran, L. W., C. E. McCarty, and R. R. Vega. 1995. Beneficial uses of marine fish hatcheries: enhancement of Red Drum in Texas coastal waters. Pages 161–166 in H. L. Schramm Jr. and R. G. Piper, editors. Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• McEachron, L. W., R. L. Colura, B. W. Bumguardner, and R. Ward. 1998. Survival of stocked Red Drum in Texas. Bulletin of Marine Science 62:359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw, M. A., E. Saillant, R. E. Broughton, and J. R. Gold. 2006. Application of hypervariable genetic markers to forensic identification of “wild” from hatchery-raised Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus. Forensic Science International 156:9–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryman, N., and L. Laikre. 1991. Effects of supportive breeding on the genetically effective population size. Conservation Biology 5:325–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saillant, E., M. A. Renshaw, D. M. Gatlin III, W. H. Neill, R. R. Vega, and J. R. Gold. 2009. An experimental assessment of genetic tagging and founder representation in hatchery-reared Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) used in stock enhancement. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 25:108–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tringali, M. D., and T. M. Bert. 1998. Risk to genetic effective population size should be an important consideration in fish stock enhancement programs. Bulletin of Marine Science 62:641–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, T. F., J. P. Wares, and J. R. Gold. 2002. Genetic effective size is three orders of magnitude smaller than adult census size in an abundant, estuarine-dependent marine fish (Sciaenops ocellatus). Genetics 162:1329–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega, R. R., C. Chavez, C. J. Stolte, and D. Abrego. 2003. Marine fish distribution report, 1991–1999. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Data Management Series 212, Austin.
   Google Scholar