276
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Local Community Perceptions of Mine Site Restoration Using Phytoremediation in Abitibi-Temiscamingue (Quebec)

&

References

  • Aznar JC, Richer-Laflèche M, Bégin C, Marion J. 2007. Mining and smelting activities produce anomalies in tree-growth patterns (Murdochville, Québec). Water Air Soil Pollut 186:139–147.
  • Benzécri J-P. 1973. L’Analyse des Données. Volume II. L’Analyse des Correspondances. Paris (France): Dunod.
  • Bussière B, Potvin R, Dagenais AM, Aubertin M, Maqsoud A, Cyr J. 2009. Restauration du site minier Lorraine, Latulipe, Québec : Résultats de 10 ans de suivi. Déchets Sci Et Tech 54:49–64.
  • Chaney RL, Angle JS, Broadhurst CL, Peters CA, Tappero RV, Sparks DL. 2007. Improved understanding of hyperaccumulation yields commercial phytoextraction and phytomining technologies. J of Environ Qual 36(5):1429–1443.
  • Chaney RL, Broadhurst CL, Centofanti T. 2010. Phytoremediation of Soil Trace Elements. In: Hooda PS, editor. Trace elements in soils. Chapter 14. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing Ltd. p. 311–352. . http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/book/10.1002/9781444319477
  • ELAW. 2010. Guidebook for Evaluating Mining Project EIAs. 1st ed. Eugene (OR): Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (ELAW). 122 pp.
  • Environment Canada. 2009. Environmental code of practice for metal mines [electronic resource]. Environmental Stewardship Branch, Public and Resources Sectors Directorate, Mining and Processing Division, Mining Section, 1/MM/17. 108 pp. http://www.ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/documents/codes/mm/mm-eng.pdf. August 2013.
  • Forum Developpement Minier. 2011. Accéder au gisement: un puits, une rampe ou une fosse [Access to the deposit: a well, a ramp, or a pit? – in French only] URL http://www.minalliance.ca/pdfs/ Gens_fiers_industrie_3_Designers_de_mines.pdf. September 2013.
  • Goodman LA. 1961. Snowball sampling. Ann Math Stat 32(1):148–170.
  • Greenacre M, Blasius J. 2006. Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. London (UK): Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Ha NTH, Sakakibara M, Sano S, Hori RS, Sera K. 2009. The potential of Eleocharis acicularis for phytoremediation: Case study at an abandoned mine site. Clean Soil, Air, Water 37(3):203–208.
  • Haase D, Rosenberg M. 2003. The changing face of the landscape. Research for the Environment 4:86–93.
  • Hill MO. 1974. Correspondence Analysis: A neglected multivariate method. Appl Statist 23(3):340–354.
  • Husson F, Lê S, Pagès J. 2010. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC. xii + 228 pp.
  • INM. 2012. L’avenir minier du Québec: Vers une nouvelle vision partagée du développement minier au Québec [The future of Quebec mining: Towards a shared new vision of mining development in Quebec; in French only]. Montreal (QC): Institut du Nouveau Monde (INM). 56 pp.
  • ISQ. 2011. Panorama des régions du Québec, Édition 2011. Québec (QC): Institut de la Statistique du Québec (ISQ), Gouvernement du Québec. 162 pp. URL http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca. August 2013.
  • Jiménez MN, Bacchetta G, Casti M, Navarro FB, Lallena AM, Fernández-Ondono E. 2011. Potential use in phytoremediation of three plant species growing on contaminated mine-tailing soils in Sardinia. Ecol Eng 37(2):392–398.
  • Lafrance PA, Lacroix R, Proulx S, Zetchi M. 2012. Restauration minière. DV-2013-1 Rapport sur les activités minières au Québec 2012. Quebéc (QC): Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune (MRNF), Gouvernement du Québec. p. 119–124.
  • MAC (Mining Association of Canada). 2012. Economic impact of mining in Canada. http://www.mining.ca/site/index.php/en/mining-in-canada/economic-impact.html. November 2013.
  • Maiti RK, Hernandez Pinero JL, Gonzalez Oreja JA, Lopez Santiago D. 2004. Plant based bioremediation and mechanisms of heavy metal tolerance of plants: a review. (Phytoremediation). Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 70(1):1–12.
  • Mench M., Schwitzguébel J.-P., Schroeder P., Bert V., and Gawronski S., Gupta S. 2009. Assessment of successful experiments and limitations of phytotechnologies: contaminant uptake, detoxification, and sequestration, and consequences to food safety. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 16, 876–900.
  • Mobbs PM. 2011. 2011 Minerals Yearbook: Canada. US Department of Interior, US Geological Survey. Revised Edition of August 2013. USGS, Canada, 19 p.
  • Morel JL. 2002. La phytoremédiation des sols contaminés. Actual Chim 8–9:63–66.
  • MRNQ. 1997. Guide et modalités de préparation du plan et exigences générales en matière de restauration des sites miniers au Québec [Guidelines for Preparing a Mining Site Rehabilitation Plan and General Mining Site Rehabilitation Requirements, in French only]. (Ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec) 64p.
  • MRNQ. 2013. Rapport sur les activités minières au Québec 2012. (Ministère des Ressources naturelles Québec) Gouvernement du Québec, 134p.
  • Nadeau MB. 2014. Development of a new green technology for the revegetation of abandoned gold mine tailings using specific symbionts associated with Picea glauca. [master's thesis]. Quebec City: Université Laval. 169 p.
  • Pilon-Smits E. 2005. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39.
  • SESAT 2010. Gouvernance des eaux souterraines de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue État de situation 2010. Société de l’eau souterraine Abitibi-Témiscamingue. 262p.
  • Singh AN, Raghubanshi AS, Sigh JS. 2002. Plantations as tool for mine spoil restoration. Curr Sci 82(12):1436–1441.
  • Spitz K, Trudinger J. 2008. Mining and the Environment: From Ore to Metal. CRC Press Balkema, Leiden 900p.
  • Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J, Adriaensen K, Ruttens A, Thewys T, Vassilev A, Meers E, Nehnevajova E, van der Lelie D, Mench M. 2009. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:765–794.
  • Weber O, Scholz RW, Bühlmann R, Grasmück D. 2001. Risk perception of heavy metal soil contamination and attitudes toward decontamination strategies. Risk Anal 21(5):967–977.
  • Wolfe AK, Bjornstad DJ. 2002. Why would anyone object? An exploration of social aspects of phytoremediation acceptability. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21(5):429–438.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.