Electromagnetic field pretreatment of Sinapis alba seeds improved cadmium phytoextraction

References

• Amna BA, Javed MT, Ali H, Munis MFH, Chaudhary HJ. 2016. Influence of endophytic Bacillus pumilus and EDTA on the phytoextraction of Cu from soil by using Cicer arietinum. Int J Phytoremediation. 19(1):14–22. doi:10.1080/15226514.2016.1216075. PMID:27869502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atak C, Emiroglu O, Alkamanoglu S, Rzakolieva A. 2003. Stimulation of regeneration by magnetic field in soybean (Glycine max Merrill) tissues cultures. J Cell Mol Biol. 2:113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Balakhnina T, Bulak P, Nosalewicz M, Pietruszewski S, Włodarczyk T. 2015. The influence of wheat Triticum aestivum L. seed pre-sowing treatment with magnetic fields on germination, seedling growth, and antioxidant potential under optimal soil watering and flooding. Acta Physiol Plant. 37:58–68. doi:10.1007/s11738-015-1802-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbafieri M, Tassi E. 2011. Brassinosteroids for phytoremediation application. In: Hayat S, Ahmad A, editors. Brassinosteroids: a class of plant hormones.. Berlin: Springer. p. 403–437.
   Google Scholar
• Benavides MP, Galleo SM, Tomar ML. 2005. Cadmium toxicity in plants. Braz J Plant Physiol. 17:21–34. doi:10.1590/S1677-04202005000100003.
   Google Scholar
• Bi R, Schlaak M, Siefert E, Lord R, Connolly H. 2010. Alternating current electrical field effects on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growing in hydroponic culture with and without cadmium contamination. J Appl Electrochem. 40:1217–1223. doi:10.1007/s10800-010-0094-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi R, Schlaak M, Siefert E, Lord R, Connolly H. 2011. Influence of electrical fields (AC and DC) on phytoremediation of metal polluted soils with rapeseed (Brassica napus) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Chemosphere. 83:318–326. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.052. PMID:21237480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulak P, Walkiewicz A, Brzezińska M. 2014. Plant growth regulators-assisted phytoextraction. Biol Plantarum. 58:1–8. doi:10.1007/s10535-013-0382-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelis J-T, Kruyts N, Dufey JE, Delvaux B, Opfergelt S. 2012. Understanding root uptake of nutrients, toxic and polluting elements in hydroponic culture. In: Toshiki Asao, editor. Hydroponics – A standard methodology for plant biological researchers.. InTech. p. 153–180. doi:10.5772/38490.
   Google Scholar
• Ćwintal M, Dziwulska-Hunek A. 2013. Effect of electromagnetic stimulation of alfalfa seeds. Int Agrophys. 27:391–401. doi:10.2478/intag-2013-0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziwulska-Hunek A, Sujak A, Kornarzyński K. 2012. Short-term exposure to pre-sowing electromagnetic radiation of Amaranth seeds affects germination energy but not photosynthetic pigment content. Pol J Environ Stud. 22:93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efthimiadou A, Katsenios N, Karkanis A, Papastylianou P, Triantafyllidis V, Travlos I, Bilalis DJ. 2014. Effects of presowing pulsed electromagnetic treatment of tomato seed on growth, yield, and lycopene content. Scientific World J. Article ID 369745, 54:135–139. doi:10.1155/2014/369745.
   Google Scholar
• Eşitken A, Turan M. 2004. Alternating magnetic field effects on yield and plant nutrient element composition of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa cv. camarosa). Acta Agric Scand. Sect B Soil Plant Sci. 54:135–139.
   Google Scholar
• Galland P, Pazur A. 2005. Magnetoreception in plants. J Plant Res.. 118:371–389. doi:10.1007/s10265-005-0246-y. PMID:16283069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosh M, Singh SP. 2005. A review of phytoremediation of heavy metals and utilization of its byproducts. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 3:1–18. doi:10.15666/aeer/0301_001018.
   Google Scholar
• Grčman H, Velikonja-Bolta Š, Vodnik D, Kos B, Leštan D. 2001. EDTA enhanced heavy metal phytoextraction: metal accumulation, leaching and toxicity. Plant Soil. 235:105–114. doi:10.1023/A:1011857303823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnorouzi A, Vaezzadeh M, Ghanati F, Jamnezhad H, Nahidian B. 2011. Growth promotion and a decrease of oxidative stress in maize seedlings by a combination of geomagnetic and weak electromagnetic fields. J Plant Physiol. 168:1123–1128. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2010.12.003. PMID:21227536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Aguilar C, Domínguez F, Cruz A, Ivanov R. 2015. Thermal effects of laser irradiation on maize seeds. Int Agrophys. 29:147–156. doi:10.1515/intag-2015-0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inozemcev GB. 2013. Impact of electromagnetic energy on the increasing yield capacity and growth stimulation of plants. Ann Warsaw Univ Life Sci – SGGW, Agricult. 62:31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kabata-Pendias A. 2010. Trace elements in soils and plants. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kornarzyński K, Pietruszewski S. 2008. Wpływ zmiennego pola magnetycznego na kiełkowanie nasion o niskiej zdolności kiełkowania. Acta Agrophys. 11:429–435 (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Kos B, Grčman H, Leštan D. 2003. Phytoextraction of lead, zinc and cadmium from soil by selected plants. Plant Soil Environ. 49:548–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda K, Robinson AJ, Henbest KB, Hogben HJ, Biskup T, Ahmad M, Schleicher E, Weber S, Timmel CR, Hore PJ. 2012. Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109:4774–4779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffei ME. 2014. Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and evolution. Front Plant Sci. 5:1–15. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meers E, Hopgood M, Lesage E, Vervaeke P, Tack FMG, Verloo MG. 2004. Enhanced phytoextraction: in search of EDTA alternatives. Int J Phytoremediation. 6:95–109. doi:10.1080/16226510490454777. PMID:15328977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazar, R, Iqbal, N, Masood, A, Iqbal, M, Khan, R, Syeed, S, Khan, NA. 2012. Cadmium toxicity in plants and role of mineral nutrients in its alleviation. AJPS. 3:1476–1489. doi:10.4236/ajps.2012.310178.
   Google Scholar
• Ol'shanskaya LN, Sobgaida NA, Tarushkina YA, Stoyanov AV. 2008. Effect of a magnetic field on extraction of heavy metals from waste water with duckweed. Chem Petrol Eng. 44:475–479. doi:10.1007/s10556-008-9075-x.
   Google Scholar
• Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY. 2007. Phytoremediation technology: hyper-accumulation metals in plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 184:105–126. doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9401-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietruszewski S, Kornarzyński K, Łacek R. 2001. Germination of wheat grain in an alternating magnetic field. Int Agrophys. 15:269–271.
   Google Scholar
• Pietruszewski S, Martínez E. 2015. Magnetic field as a method of improving the quality of sowing material: a review. Int Agrophys. 29:377–389. doi:10.1515/intag-2015-0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Płociniczak T, Sinkkonen A, Romantschuk M, Sułowicz S, Pietrowska-Seget Z. 2016. Rhizospheric bacterial strain Brevibacterium casei MH8a colonizes plant tissues and enhances Cd, Zn, Cu phytoextraction by white mustard. Front Plant Sci. 7:101–111. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan R, Kumari BDR. 2012. Pulsed magnetic field: a contemporary approach offers to enhance plant growth and yield of soybean. Plant Physiol Biochem. 51:139–144. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.10.017. PMID: 22153250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha P, Shinde O, Sarkar S. 2017. Phytoremediation of industrial mines wastewater using water hyacinth. Int J Phytoremediation. 19(1):87–96. doi:10.1080/15226514.2016.1216078. PMID:27551860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarma H. 2011. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants: a review focusing on phytoremediation technology. J Environ Sci Technol. 4:118–138. doi:10.3923/jest.2011.118.138.
   Google Scholar
• Selim A-FS, El-Nady MF. 2011. Physio-anatomical responses of drought stressed tomato plants to magnetic field. Acta Astronaut. 69:387–396. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma I. 2013. Arsenic-induced oxidative stress and antioxidant defense system of Pisum sativum and Pennisetum typhoides: a comparative study. Res J Biotechnol. 8:48–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socorro A, García F. 2012. Stimulation of magnetic field effect on a seed embryo cell. Int Agrophys. 26:167–173. doi:10.2478/v10247-012-0024-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siecińska, J, Wiącek D, Nosalewicz A. 2016. The influence of soil acidity on aluminium and mineral nutrients concentrations in solutions from soil at different water potentials. Acta Agrophys. 23:97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Sujak A, Dziwulska-Hunek A, Reszczyńska E. 2013. Effect of electromagnetic stimulation on selected Fabaceae plants. Pol J Environ Stud. 22:893–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White PJ, Broadley MR. 2003. Calcium in plants. Ann Bot. 92:487–511. doi:10.1093/aob/mcg164. PMID:12933363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CKE, Cobbett CS. 2009. HMA P-Type ATPases are the major mechanism for root-to-shoot Cd translocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 181:71–78. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02638.x. PMID:19076718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Van Briesen JM. 2006. The formation of intermediates in EDTA and NTA biodegradation. Environ Eng Sci. 23:533–544. doi:10.1089/ees.2006.23.533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar