Sustainability and performance analysis of constructed wetland for treatment of greywater in batch process

References

• Abdallat G. 2015. Optimization of nitrogen removal in various vertical flow constructed wetland designs and application of treated wastewater for reuse in irrigation in Jordan [dissertation]. Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelhakeem SG, Aboulroos SA, Kamel MM. 2016. Performance of a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland under different operational conditions. J Adv Res. 7(5):803–814. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abed SN. 2012. Effect of wastewater quality on the performance of constructed wetland in an arid region. Ramallah: Birzeit University.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida A, Jóźwiakowski K, Kowalczyk-Juśko A, Bugajski P, Kurek K, Carvalho F, Durao A, Ribeiro C, Gajewska M. 2018. Nitrogen removal in vertical flow constructed wetlands: influence of bed depth and high nitrogen loadings. Environ Technol (United Kingdom). 0:1–34. doi:10.1080/09593330.2018.1557749.
   Google Scholar
• Amarasinghe UA, Smakhtin V. 2014. Global water demand projections: past, present and future. Colombo: International Water Management Institute (IWMI).
   Google Scholar
• Andreo-Martínez P, García-Martínez N, Quesada-Medina J, Almela L. 2017. Domestic wastewaters reuse reclaimed by an improved horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland: a case study in the southeast of Spain. Bioresour Technol. 233:236–246. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Arden S, Ma X. 2018. Constructed wetlands for greywater recycle and reuse: a review. Sci Total Environ. 630:587–599. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohórquez E, Paredes D, Arias CA. 2017. Vertical flow-constructed wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment under tropical conditions: effect of different design and operational parameters. Environ Technol. 38(2):199–208. [Internet]. doi:10.1080/09593330.2016.1230650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brix H. 1999. The European Research Project on reed die-back and progression (EUREED). Limnologica. 29(1):5–10. doi:10.1016/S0075-9511(99)80033-4.
   Google Scholar
• Brix H, Schierup HH, Arias CA. 2007. Twenty years experience with constructed wetland systems in Denmark – what did we learn?. Water Sci Technol. 56(3):63–68. doi:10.2166/wst.2007.522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Çakir R, Gidirislioglu A, Çebi U. 2015. A study on the effects of different hydraulic loading rates (HLR) on pollutant removal efficiency of subsurface horizontal-flow constructed wetlands used for treatment of domestic wastewaters. J Environ Manage. 164:121–128. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calheiros CSC, Rangel A, Castro P. 2007. Constructed wetland systems vegetated with different plants applied to the treatment of tannery wastewater. Water Res. 41(8):1790–1798. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciria MP, Solano ML, Soriano P. 2005. Role of macrophyte Typha latifolia in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and assessment of its potential as a biomass fuel. Biosyst Eng. 92(4):535–544. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Z, Sebro DY, Aboukila AF, Bengtsson L. 2016. Variable residence time-based model for BOD removal in free-water surface wetlands. Ecol Eng. 97:334–343. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny P. 1997. Implementation of constructed wetlands in developing countries. Water Sci Technol. 35(5):27–34. doi:10.2166/wst.1997.0157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson E, Auffarth K, Eilersen AM, Henze M, Ledin A. 2003. Household chemicals and personal care products as sources for xenobiotic organic compounds in grey wastewater. WSA. 29(2):135–146. doi:10.4314/wsa.v29i2.4848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson E, Auffarth K, Henze M, Ledin A. 2002. Characteristics of grey wastewater. Urban Water. 4(1):85–104. doi:10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00064-4.
   Google Scholar
• Fogli S, Marchesini R, Gerdol R. 2002. Reed (Phragmites australis) decline in a brackish wetland in Italy. Mar Environ Res. 53(5):465–479. doi:10.1016/S0141-1136(02)00091-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ávila F, Patiño-Chávez J, Zhinín-Chimbo F, Donoso-Moscoso S, Flores del Pino L, Avilés-Añazco A. 2019. Performance of Phragmites australis and Cyperus papyrus in the treatment of municipal wastewater by vertical flow subsurface constructed wetlands. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 7(3):286–296. doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaitidak D, Yadav KD. 2014. Potential of greywater to sustain the water demand a case study of SVNIT, Surat. J Indian Water Work Assoc. XXXXVI:98–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaitidak DM, Yadav KD. 2013. Characteristics and treatment of greywater – a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 20(5):2795–2809. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1533-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross A, Shmueli O, Ronen Z, Raveh E. 2007. Recycled vertical flow constructed wetland (RVFCW) – a novel method of recycling greywater for irrigation in small communities and households. Chemosphere. 66(5):916–923. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guppy L, Anderson K. 2017. Global water crisis report. Hamilton (Canada): United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Kadlec RH, Wallace SD. 2009. Treatment wetlands. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landschoot P. 2016. Irrigation water quality guidelines for turfgrass sites. Penn State Ext [Internet]. Available from https://extension.psu.edu/irrigation-water-quality-guidelines-for-turfgrass-sites
   Google Scholar
• Li F, Wichmann K, Otterpohl R. 2009. Review of the technological approaches for grey water treatment and reuses. Sci Total Environ. 407(11):3439–3449. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard Latune R, Laporte-Daube O, Fina N, Peyrat S, Pelus L, Molle P. 2017. Which plants are needed for a French vertical-flow constructed wetland under a tropical climate?. Water Sci Technol. 75(8):1873–1881. doi:10.2166/wst.2017.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maimon A, Tal A, Friedler E, Gross A. 2010. Safe on-site reuse of greywater for irrigation–a critical review of current guidelines. Environ Sci Technol. 44(9):3213–3220. doi:10.1021/es902646g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjate ES, Lana LCO, Moraes DC, Vasconcellos GR, Maciel GRM, von Sperling M. 2015. First stage of the French vertical flow constructed wetland system: experiments with the reduction of surface area and number of units. J Water, Sanit Hyg Dev. 5(1):50–55. doi:10.2166/washdev.2014.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nzengy’A DM, Wishitemi B. 2001. The performance of constructed wetlands for, wastewater treatment: a case study of Splash wetland in Nairobi Kenya. Hydrol Process. 15:3239–3247. doi:10.1002/hyp.185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulo PL, Begosso L, Pansonato N, Shrestha RR, Boncz MA. 2009. Design and configuration criteria for wetland systems treating greywater. Water Sci Technol. 60(8):2001–2007. doi:10.2166/wst.2009.542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska CA, Zouboulis AI, Eskridge KM. 2007. Performance of pilot-scale vertical-flow constructed wetlands, as affected by season, substrate, hydraulic load and frequency of application of simulated urban sewage. Ecol Eng. 31(1):57–66. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai UN, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Dwivedi S, Tripathi RD. 2015. Seasonal applicability of horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetland for trace elements and nutrient removal from urban wastes to conserve Ganga River water quality at Haridwar, India. Ecol Eng. 81:115–122. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau DPL, Vanrolleghem PA, De Pauw N. 2004. Constructed wetlands in flanders: a performance analysis. Ecol Eng. 23:151–163. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Putten WH. 1997. Die-back of Phragmites australis in European wetlands: an overview of the European Research Programme on Reed Die-back and Progression (1993-1994). Aquat Bot. 59(3–4):263–275. doi:10.1016/S0304-3770(97)00060-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vipat V, Singh UR, Billore SK. 2008. Efficacy of rootzone technology for treatment of domestic wastewater: field scale study of a pilot project in Bhopal (MP), India. Proceedings of Taal 2007: 12th World Lake Conference October 28 to November 2 2007, Jaipur, India. Jaipur: 995–1003.
   Google Scholar
• Vymazal J. 2008. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: a review. Biocycle. 32:44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Vymazal J. 2011. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience. Environ Sci Technol. 45(1):61–69. doi:10.1021/es101403q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Hu Z, Liang S, Fan J, Liu H. 2015. A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Bioresour Technol. 175:594–601. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Zhang J, Ngo HH, Guo W, Liang S, Hao H, Guo W, Liang S. 2017. Evaluating the sustainability of free water surface flow constructed wetlands: methane and nitrous oxide emissions. J Clean Prod. 147:152–156. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Lu M, Bian H, Sheng L, He C. 2018. Effects of physical clogging on the performance of a lab-scale vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland system and simulation research. Ecol Indic. 92:11–17. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Lu M, Sheng L, Wu H. 2018. Study of the spatial and temporal distribution of accumulated solids in an experimental vertical-flow constructed wetland system. Sci Total Environ. 628–629:509–516. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita F, Roy ED, White JR. 2012. Municipal wastewater treatment in Mexico: current status and opportunities for employing ecological treatment systems. Environ Technol (United Kingdom). 33:1151–1158. doi:10.1080/09593330.2011.610364.
   Google Scholar