The use of willow microcuttings for phytoremediation in a copper, zinc and lead contaminated field trial in Shanghai, China

References

• Adler A, Verwijst T, Aronsson P. 2005. Estimation and relevance of bark proportion in a willow stand. Biomass Bioenergy. 29(2):102–113. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniadis V, Levizou E, Shaheen SM, Ok YS, Sebastian A, Baum C, Prasad MNV, Wenzel WW, Rinklebe J. 2017. Trace elements in the soil-plant interface: Phytoavailability, translocation, and phytoremediation – a review. Earth Sci Rev. 171:621–645. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp S, Jerbi A, Frenette-Dussault C, Pitre FE, Labrecque M. 2018. Does the origin of cuttings influence yield and phytoextraction potential of willow in a contaminated soil? Ecol Eng. 111:125–133. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Gomez-Eyles JL, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T. 2011. A review of biochars' potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut. 159(12):3269–3282. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissonnette L, St-Arnaud M, Labrecque M. 2010. Phytoextraction of heavy metals by two Salicaceae clones in symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during the second year of a field trial. Plant Soil. 332(1–2):55–67. doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0273-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter LT, Pezeshki SR, Shields FD. 2008. Responses of nonstructural carbohydrates to shoot removal and soil moisture treatments in Salix nigra. Trees. 22(5):737–748. doi:10.1007/s00468-008-0234-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier-Hurteau B, Turmel MC, Mercier C, Courchesne F. 2014. The sequestration of trace elements by willow (Salix purpurea)-which soil properties favor uptake and accumulation? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 21(6):4759–4771. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-2450-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courchesne F, Turmel MC, Cloutier-Hurteau B, Constantineau S, Munro L, Labrecque M. 2017. Phytoextraction of soil trace elements by willow during a phytoremediation trial in southern Québec, Canada. Int J Phytoremediation. 19(6):545–554. doi:10.1080/15226514.2016.1267700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos Utmazian MN, Wenzel WW. 2007. Cadmium and zinc accumulation in willow and poplar species grown on polluted soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 170 (2):265–272. doi:10.1002/jpln.200622073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos Utmazian MN, Wieshammer G, Vega R, Wenzel WW. 2007. Hydroponic screening for metal resistance and accumulation of cadmium and zinc in twenty clones of willows and poplars. Environ Pollut. 148 (1):155–165. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.10.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenette-Dussault C, Benoist P, Kadri H, Pitre FE, Labrecque M. 2019. Rapid production of biomass using a novel micro-cutting-based field planting technology. Ecol Eng. 126:37–42. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.10.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidi W, Pitre FE, Labrecque M. 2013. Short-rotation coppice of willows for the production of biomass in Eastern Canada. In: Matovic MD, editors. Biomass now - sustainable growth and use. In Tech Open Science. Chapter 17. p. 421–448.
   Google Scholar
• Hangs RD, Schoenau JJ, Van Rees KCJ, Steppuhn H. 2011. Examining the salt tolerance of willow (Salix spp.) bioenergy species for use on salt-affected agricultural lands. Can J Plant Sci. 91(3):509–517. doi:10.4141/cjps10135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerbi A, Guidi Nissim W, Fluet R, Labrecque M. 2015. Willow root development and morphology changes under different irrigation and fertilization regimes in a vegetation filter. Bioenerg Res. 8(2):775–787. doi:10.1007/s12155-014-9550-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung MC. 2008. Heavy metal concentrations in soils and factors affecting metal uptake by plants in the vicinity of a Korean Cu-W mine. Sensors (Basel)). 8(4):2413–2423. edoi:10.3390/s8042413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabata-Pendias A. 2001. Trace elements in soils and plants. Bocca Raton (FL): CRC Press. p. 413.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzovkina YA, Quigley MF. 2005. Willows beyond wetlands: uses of Salix L. species for environmental projects. Water Air Soil Pollut. 162(1–4):183–204. doi:10.1007/s11270-005-6272-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzovkina YA, Volk TA. 2009. The characterization of willow (Salix L.) varieties for use in ecological engineering applications: co-ordination of structure, function and autecology. Ecol Eng. 35(8):1178–1189. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Fang HL, Zhang TL, Wang XX, Liu YD. 2017. Heavy metals in leaves of twelve plant species from seven different areas in Shanghai, China. Urban For For Greening. 27:390–398. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmiroli N, Marmiroli M, Maestri E. 2006. Phytoremediation and phytotechnologies: a review for the present and the future. In: Twardowska I, Allen HE, Häggblom MM; Stefaniak S, editors. Soil and water pollution monitoring, protection and remediation. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Maxted AP, Black CR, West HM, Crout NMJ, McGrath SP, Young SD. 2007. Phytoextraction of cadmium and zinc by Salix from soil historically amended with sewage sludge. Plant Soil. 290(1-2):157–172. doi:10.1007/s11104-006-9149-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacaldo R, Volk T, Briggs R. 2013. Greenhouse gas potentials of shrub willow biomass crops based on below- and aboveground biomass inventory along a 19-year chronosequence. Bioenerg Res. 6(1):252–262. doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9250-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulford ID, Watson C. 2003. Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated land by trees – a review. Environ Int. 29(4):529–540. doi:10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00152-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafay M, Abdullah M, Hussain T, Ruby T, Akhtar S, Fatima I. 2015. Germination percentage and growing behaviour of Salix tetrasperma (Willow) as affected by size of branch cutting and low polythene tunnel. J Biodivers Environ Sci. 6(4):318–325.
   Google Scholar
• Rosselli W, Keller C, Boschi K. 2003. Phytoextraction capacity of trees growing on a metal contaminated soil. Plant and Soil. 256(2):265–272. doi:10.1023/A:1026100707797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Labelle S, Mehta P, Mihoc A, Fortin N, Masson C, Leblanc R, Châteauneuf G, Sura C, Gallipeau C, et al. 2005. Phytoremediation of heavy metal and PAH-contaminated brownfield sites. Plant Soil. 272(1–2):277–290., doi:10.1007/s11104-004-5295-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytter R, Hansson A. 1996. Seasonal amount, growth and depth distribution of fine roots in an irrigated and fertilized Salix viminalis L. plantation. Biomass Bioenergy. 11(2–3):129–137. doi:10.1016/0961-9534(96)00023-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I. 1998. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 49:643–668. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2003. Statistical analysis system. SAS release 9.1 for Windows. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shang KK, Hu Y, Vincent G, Labrecque M. 2020. Biomass and phytoextraction potential of three ornamental shrub species tested over three years on a large-scale experimental site in Shanghai, China. Int J Phytoremediation. 22(1):10–19. doi:10.1080/15226514.2019.1633998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi G, Chen Z, Xu S, Zhang J, Wang L, Bi C, Teng J. 2008. Potentially toxic metal contamination of urban soils and roadside dust in Shanghai, China. Environ Pollut. 156(2):251–260. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian ZH, Song K, Da LJ. 2015. Distribution pattern and traits of weed communities along an urban-rural gradient under rapid urbanization in Shanghai, China. Weed Biol Manag. 15(1):27–41. doi:10.1111/wbm.12062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandecasteele B, Quataert P, Genouw G, Lettens S, Tack FM. 2009. Effects of willow stands on heavy metal concentrations and top soil properties of infrastructure spoil landfills and dredged sediment-derived sites. Sci Total Environ. 407(20):5289–5297. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandecasteele B, Quataert P, Piesschaert F, Lettens S, De Vos B, Du Laing G. 2015. Translocation of Cd and Mn from bark to leaves in willows on contaminated sediments: delayed budburst is related to high Mn concentrations. Land. 4(2):255–280. doi:10.3390/land4020255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent G, Shang K, Zhang G, Labrecque M. 2018. Preliminary results of the tolerance to inorganic contaminants and phytoextraction potential of twelve ornamental shrubs tested on an experimental contaminated site. iForest. 11(3):442–448. doi:10.3832/ifor2716-011.
   Google Scholar
• Violante A, Cozzolino V, Perelomov L, Caporale AG, Pigna M. 2010. Mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals and metalloids in soil environments. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 10 (3):268–292. doi:10.4067/S0718-95162010000100005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y. 2017. Illustrated flora of Shanghai: trees and shrubs. Shanghai, China: China Scientific Book Services (In Chinese). p. 413.
   Google Scholar
• Wei B, Yang L. 2010. A review of heavy metal contamination in urban soils dusts and agricultural soils from China. Microchem J. 94(2):99–107. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2009.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welc M, Lundkvist A, Verwijst T. 2017. Effects of cutting phenology (non-dormant versus dormant) on early growth performance of three willow clones grown under different weed treatments and planting dates. Bioenerg Res. 10(4):1094–1104. doi:10.1007/s12155-017-9871-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HB, Fang HL, Peng HL, Liang J, Cai YP, Hao GJ. 2012. Soil physical properties analysis of the typical newly established green belt of Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden. J Soil and Water Conserv. 26(6):85–90.
   Google Scholar