Specialization and the Use of GPS for Domestic Violence by Pretrial Programs: Findings from a National Survey of U.S. Practitioners

References

• Allard, T. J., Wortley, R. K., & Stewart, A. L. (2003). Role conflict in community corrections. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9(3), 279–289. doi:10.1080/1068316031000093414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Probation and Parole Association [APPA]. (1991). Caseload standards: APPA Issues Committee Report. Perspectives. Retrieved from https://www.appa-net.org/eweb/docs/APPA/stances/ip_CS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Associated Press. (2014, March 9). For domestic violence victims, promise in GPS. CBS Minnesota. Retrieved from http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2014/03/09/for-domestic-violence-victims-promise-in-gps/
   Google Scholar
• Bales, W. D., Mann, K., Blomberg, T. G., Gaes, G. G., Barrick, K., Dhungana, K., & McManus, B. (2010). A quantitative and qualitative assessment of electronic monitoring. Report Submitted to the Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/230530.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R. A., Huff, R. C., & Lilly, R. J. (1988). House arrest and correctional policy: Doing time at home. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, G. C., Ahlman, L., Gill, C., Sherman, L. W., Kurtz, E., & Malvestuto, R. (2010). Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6, 159–189. doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9094-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, C. R. (2003). How can practitioners help an abused women lower her risk of death? (NCJ No. 196545). National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 4–7. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/jr000250c.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000). Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 61–75. doi:10.1177/0011128700046001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. L. (2007). Effects of supervision philosophy on intensive probationers. Justice Policy Journal, 4(1), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno v. Codd. (1978). 90 Misc. 2d 1047, 1049, 396 N.Y.S.2d 974, 976 (Sup. Ct., Special Term, Part 1 1977), rev’d, 64 A.D.2d 582, 407 N.Y.S.2d 165 (1st Dep’t 1978), aff’d, 47 N.Y.2d 582, 393 N.E.2d 976, 419 N.Y.S.2d 901 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2008). A racial justice perspective on monitoring domestic violence offenders using GPS systems. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 43, 271–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, K. (2011). The construction and interpretation of risk management technologies in contemporary probation practice. British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 120–125. doi:10.1093/bjc/azq056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, B. (2006). Caseload standards for probation and parole (September 2006). American Probation and Parole Association. Retrieved from https://www.appa-net.org/eweb/docs/APPA/stances/ip_CSPP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (2013). Evidence-based prosecution: Is it worth the cost? Criminology & Public Policy, 12(3), 491–505. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. M., & Kelly, L. (1989). Restructuring probation as an intermediate sanction: An evaluation of the Massachusetts intensive probation supervision program. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Research Program on the Punishment & Control of Offenders.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, J. M. (2006). Parole system anomie: Conflicting models of casework and surveillance. Federal Probation, 70(3), 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cheliotis, L. K. (2006). How iron is the iron cage of new penology? The role of human agency in the implementation of criminal justice policy. Punishment & Society, 8(3), 313–340. doi:10.1177/1462474506064700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Henry, D. A. (2003). Pretrial services programming at the start of the 21st century: A survey of pretrial services programs (NCJ 199773). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Assistance, USDOJ.
   Google Scholar
• Clear, T. R. (1996). The punitive paradox: Desert and the compulsion to punish. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33(1), 94–108. doi:10.1177/0022427896033001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clear, T. R., & Latessa, E. J. (1993). Probation officers’ roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance versus treatment. Justice Quarterly, 10(3), 441–462. doi:10.1080/07418829300091921
   Google Scholar
• Clear, T. R., Flynn, S., & Shapiro, C. (1987). Intensive supervision in probation: A comparison of three projects. In B. McCarthy (Ed.), Intermediate punishments intensive supervision, home confinement and electronic surveillance (pp. 31–50). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, R., & Marx, G. T. (1991). Critique: No soul in the new machine: Technofallacies in the electronic monitoring movement. Justice Quarterly, 8, 399–414. doi:10.1080/07418829100091111
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, R. (2005). Implementing GPS electronic monitoring: A survey of GPS offender tracking programs in the U.S. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 18(1), 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, R., & De Lint, W. (2009). GPS-electronic monitoring and contemporary penology: Case study of US GPS-electronic monitoring programmes. The Howard Journal, 48(1), 76–87. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2008.00545.x
   Google Scholar
• Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia. (n.d.). Chapter VI: Core Case Management Activities. Community Supervision Services Operations Manual. Retrieved from http://www.csosa.gov/about/policies/css/manual/6ChapterVICoreCaseManagemtAct-030108.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Curry, M. R., Phillips, D. J., & Regan, P. M. (2004). Emergency response systems and the creeping legibility of people and places. The Information Society, 20, 357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Cynthia L. Bischof Memorial Foundation (n.d.). National progress: States passing laws to use GPS monitoring in domestic violence cases. Retrieved from http://www.cindysmemorial.org/?page_id=288
   Google Scholar
• Deleuzean, G. (1992, Winter). Postscript on the societies of control (pp. 3–7). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.spunk.org/texts/misc/sp000962.txt December 1, 2014, OCTOBER 59.
   Google Scholar
• DeMichele, M. T. (2007). Probation and parole’s growing caseloads and workload allocation: Strategies for managerial decision making. Report of the American Probation and Parole Association. Retrieved from http://www.appa-net.org/eweb/docs/appa/pubs/SMDM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeMichele, M. T., & Payne, B. K. (2009, August 1). Using technology to monitor offenders: A community corrections perspective. Corrections Today. Retrieved from https://www.aca.org/fileupload/177/ahaidar/DeMichele_Payne.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeMichele, M. T., Payne, B. K., & Matz, A. K. (2011). Community supervision workload considerations for public safety. Report of the American Probation and Parole Association. Retrieved from https://www.appa-net.org/eweb/docs/APPA/pubs/CSWCFPS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dron, J. (2013). Soft is hard and hard is easy: Learning technologies and social media. Form@re, 13, 32–43. Retrieved from http://www.fupress.net/index.php/formare/article/view/12613/11944
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E. (2002). Domestic violence and the criminal justice system: An overview. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 7(1), 3. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/ojin/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume72002/No1Jan2002/DomesticViolenceandCriminalJustice.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E., Globokar, J. L., & Ibarra, P. R. (2014). Outsiders inside: Victim management in an era of participatory reforms. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 169–188. doi:10.1177/0269758013510809
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E., & Ibarra, P. R. (2007). Making your home a shelter: Electronic monitoring and victim re-entry in domestic violence cases. British Journal of Criminology, 47(1), 100–120. doi:10.1093/bjc/azl026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez, E., Ibarra, P. R., Bales, W., & Gur, O. M. (2012). GPS monitoring technologies and domestic violence: An evaluation study. A report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238910.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E., Ibarra, P. R., & Gur, O. M. (2013). Using GPS in domestic violence cases: Lessons from a study of pretrial programs. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 25(1), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, E., Ibarra, P. R., & Lurie, N. A. (2004). Applying electronic monitoring to domestic violence cases: A study of two bilateral programs. Federal Probation, 68(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997). Policing the risk society. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erwin, B. S. (1990). Old and new tools for the modern probation officer. Crime & Delinquency, 36(1), 61–74. doi:10.1177/0011128790036001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449–474. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, M. A. (2013). Overview of: “Evidence-based and victim-centered prosecutorial policies: Examination of deterrent and therapeutic jurisprudence effects on domestic violence.” Criminology & Public Policy, 12(3), 441–442. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forliti, A. (2014). GPS for Ramsey County domestic violence victims shows promise. Associated Press. Retrieved from http://www.twincities.com/2014/03/08/gps-for-ramsey-county-domestic-violence-victims-shows-promise/
   Google Scholar
• Friel, C. M., & Vaughn, J. B. (1986). A consumer’s guide to the electronic monitoring of probationers. Federal Probation, 50, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, B., Stichman, A., Travis, L., & Latessa, E. (1997). Moderating probation and parole officer attitudes to achieve desired outcomes. The Prison Journal, 77(3), 295–312. doi:10.1177/0032855597077003005
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A., & King, D. (2002). Home detention with electronic monitoring in New Zealand and its implications for probation. VISTA, 7(2), 100–110.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A., & King, D. (2003). Home detention with electronic monitoring: The New Zealand experience. Criminal Justice, 3(2), 199–211. doi:10.1177/1466802503003002004
   Google Scholar
• Gill, C. E. (2010). The effects of sanction intensity on criminal conduct: A randomized low-intensity probation experiment (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, D. (1969). Effectiveness of a prison and parole system. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S. (1983). Questioning the practice of pretrial detention: Some empirical evidence from Philadelphia. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74(4), 1556–1588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S. (1985). Danger and detention: A second generation of bail reform. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76(1), 1–74. doi:10.2307/1143065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (2009, May 8). More states use GPS to track abusers. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/09/us/09gps.html
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. M., Clear, T. R., & Baird, S. C. (1989). Have community supervision officers changed their attitudes toward their work? Justice Quarterly, 6(2), 233–246. doi:10.1080/07418828900090161
   Google Scholar
• Hucklesby, A. (2009). Understanding offenders’ compliance: A case study of electronically monitored curfew orders. Journal of Law and Society, 36(2), 248–271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hucklesby, A. (2011). The working life of electronic monitoring officers. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(1), 59–76. doi:10.1177/1748895810392185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, P. R. (2005). Red flags and trigger control: The role of human supervision in an electronic 
monitoring program. Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance, 6, 31–48. doi:10.1016/s1521-6136(04)06003-8
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, P. R., & Erez, E. (2005). Victim-centric diversion? The electronic monitoring of domestic violence cases. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(2), 259–276. doi:10.1002/bsl.639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, P. R., Gur, O. M., & Erez, E. (2014). Surveillance as casework: Supervising domestic violence defendants with GPS technology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(4), 417–444. doi:10.1007/s10611-014-9536-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Howard Society of Alberta. (2000). Electronic monitoring. Retrieved from http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/pub/A3.htm
   Google Scholar
• John Howard Society of Alberta. (2006). Electronic (radio frequency) and GPS monitored community based supervision programs. Retrieved from http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/pub/pdf/monitorupdate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. R., Haugen, L., Maness, J. W., & Ross, P. P. (1989). Attitudes toward electronic monitoring of offenders: A survey of probation officers and prosecutors. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 5, 153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2005). A tagging tale: The work of the monitoring officer, electronically monitoring offenders in England and Wales. Surveillance and Society, 2(4), 581–588.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. (2007, May 4). Tracking device: How about using GPS monitoring to stop batterers? Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/id/2165568
   Google Scholar
• Klockars, C. (1972). A theory of probation supervision. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 64(4), 549–557.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, A. J. (2009). Evaluation of the pretrial release pilot program in the Mesa municipal court. Institute for Court Management, Court executive Development Program, 2008–2009 Phase III Project. Retrieved from http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/128/Docs/ICMF/Lemke_ICMF.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lilly, R. J. (1989). A brief and speculative comparison of “house arrest” and electronic monitoring in the United States and Britain. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 4(1), 127–138. doi:10.1080/13600869.1989.9966283
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1–94. doi:10.2307/1289533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainprize, S. (1996). Elective affinities in the engineering of social control: The evolution of electronic monitoring. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 2(2), 26.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, G., & Nellis, M. (2013). “Parallel tracks”: Probation and electronic monitoring in England, Wales and Scotland. In K. Beyens & D. Kaminski (Eds.), Electronically monitored punishment: International and critical perspectives (pp. 63–81). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medick, F. (2008). Domestic violence defendants’ jury trial rights in GPS monitoring. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 43, 277–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (2001). Spatial governmentality and the new urban social order: Controlling gender violence through law. American Anthropologist, 103(1), 16–29. doi:10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2015). Contemporary modes of probation officer supervision: The triumph of the “synthetic” officer? Justice Quarterly, 32(2), 314–336. doi:10.1080/07418825.2013.770546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T. K., & Lindner, C. (1985). Probation and the hi-technology revolution: Is a reconceptualization of the traditional probation officer role model inevitable? Criminal Justice Review, 10(1), 25–32. doi:10.1177/073401688501000104
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, M. (2005). Electronic monitoring, satellite tracking and the new punitiveness in England and Wales. In J. Pratt, D. Brown, M. Brown, S. Hallsworth, & W. Morrison (Eds.), The new punitiveness: Trends, theories and perspectives (pp. 167–185). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, M. (2009). Surveillance and confinement: Explaining and understanding the experience of electronically monitored curfews. European Journal of Probation, 1(1), 41–65. doi:10.1177/206622030900100104
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, M. (2014). Understanding the electronic monitoring of offenders in Europe: Expansion, regulation and prospects. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(4), 489–510. doi:10.1007/s10611-014-9540-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, K. G., Bales, W. D., & Blomberg, T. G. (2006). Under surveillance: An empirical test of the effectiveness and consequences of electronic monitoring. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(1), 61–92. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00102.x
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, C. (2007). ‘Street-level surveillance’: Human agency and the electronic monitoring of offenders. Surveillance and Society, 4(4), 314–328.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, C., & Clamp, K. (2014). Innovating responses to managing risk: Exploring the potential of a victim-focused policing strategy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 8(1), 51–58. doi:10.1093/police/pat028
   Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 149–163. doi:10.1177/0306624x9804200207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peillard, A. M. M. (2013). Vigilancia en la modernidad tardía: El monitoreo telemático de infractores [Surveillance in Late Modernity: Telematic Monitoring of Offenders]. Política Criminal, 16(8), 408–471. Retrieved from http://www.politicacriminal.cl/Vol_08/n_16/Vol8N16A3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (1995). A crime control rationale for reinvesting in community corrections. The Prison Journal, 75(4), 479–496. doi:10.1177/0032855595075004005
   Google Scholar
• President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pretrial Justice Institute (PJI). (2009, August 11). 2009 survey of pretrial services programs. Retrieved from http://www.pretrial.org/download/pji-reports/new-PJI%202009%20Survey%20of%20Pretrial%20Services%20Programs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Renzema, M., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005). Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 215–237. doi:10.1007/s11292-005-1615-1
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, D. L. (2008). Correlative rights and the boundaries of freedom: Protecting the civil rights of endangered women. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 43, 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santry, S. M. (2011). Can you find me now? Amanda’s bill: A case study in the use of GPS in tracking pretrial domestic violence offenders. Quinnipiac Law Review, 29, 1101–1124.
   Google Scholar
• Satine, L. (2008). Maximal safety, minimal intrusion: Monitoring civil protective orders without implicating privacy. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 43, 267–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott v. Hart. (1976). U.S. Dist Ct. for the Northern Dist. Of Calif. C76–2395 (N.D. Cal. Filed Oct. 28, 1976).
   Google Scholar
• Seiter, R. P., & West, A. D. (2003). Supervision styles in probation and parole. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 38(2), 57–75. doi:10.1300/j076v38n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 261–272. doi:10.2307/2095575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., & Harris, H. M. (2013). Increased homicide victimization of suspects arrested for domestic violence: A 23-year follow-up of the Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment (MilDVE). Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(4), 491–514. doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9193-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J., & Feeley, M. M. (1995). True crime: The new penology and public discourse on crime. In T. G. Blomberg & S. Cohen (Eds.), Punishment and social control (pp. 147–180). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Staples, W. G., & Decker, S. K. (2008). Technologies of the body, technologies of the self: House arrest as neo-liberal governance. In M. Deflem & J. T. Ulmer (Eds.), Surveillance and governance: Crime control and beyond (Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Volume 10; pp. 131–149). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000a). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (MCJ 181867). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000b). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women (NCJ 183781). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Ugwudike, P. (2011). Mapping the interface between contemporary risk-focused policy and frontline enforcement practice. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 11(3), 242–258. doi:10.1177/1748895811401975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. A., Naro, W., & Austin, J. F. (2007). Innovations in probation: Assessing New York City’s automated reporting system. Washington, DC: JFA Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1978). The investigators. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar