Understanding Data-Driven Organizational Culture: A Case Study of Family League of Baltimore

References

• Alabastro, A., Rast, D. E., III, Lac, A., Hogg, M. A., & Crano, W. D. (2013). Intergroup bias and perceived similarity: Effects of successes and failures on support for in-and outgroup political leaders. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(1), 58–67. doi: 10.1177/1368430212437212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, J. M., Nicholson, B., & Subhramanian, E. (2013). A framework using institutional analysis and the capability approach in ICT4D. Information Technologies & International Development, 9(1), 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., & Nudurupati, S. (2012). Performance measurement: Challenges for tomorrow*. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 305–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, J. T., & Blankenberger, B. (2017). Collaboration challenges and the construction of complex data systems: Lessons from the development of the Illinois longitudinal data system. Public Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 695–740.
   Google Scholar
• Buckmaster, N. (1999). Associations between outcome measurement, accountability and learning for non-profit organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(2), 186–197. doi: 10.1108/09513559910263499
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. A., & Lambright, K. T. (2017). Struggling to get it right: Performance measurement challenges and strategies for addressing them among funders of human services. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27(3), 335–351. doi: 10.1002/nml.21249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, J. G., & Fredericks, K. A. (2010). Evaluation capacity and nonprofit organizations: Is the glass half-empty or half-full? American Journal of Evaluation, 31(1), 84–104. doi: 10.1177/1098214009352361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnochan, S., Samples, M., Myers, M., & Austin, M. J. (2014). Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(6), 1014–1032. doi: 10.1177/0899764013508009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., & Michelman, J. E. (1993). An institutional theory perspective on the DRG framework, case-mix accounting systems and health-care organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(1), 65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F., McAdam, D., Scott, W. R., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (2005). Social movements and organization theory. New York, N.Y: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drennan, D. (1992). Transforming company culture: Getting your company from where you are now to where you want to be. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company
   Google Scholar
• Family League of Baltimore. (2017). About family league of Baltimore. Retrieved April 26, from http://familyleague.org/about/
   Google Scholar
• Foroni, F., & Rothbart, M. (2011). Category boundaries and category labels: When does a category name influence the perceived similarity of category members? Social Cognition, 29(5), 547–576. doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.5.547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiling, D., Harris, M., & Stanley, R. (2016). Accountability in non-profit organizations introduction to the symposium. Public Administration Quarterly, 40(2), 212–219.
   Google Scholar
• Greiling, D., & Stötzer, S. (2016). Accountability reporting in austrian nonprofit organizations - more than a compliance instrument? Public Administration Quarterly, 40(2), 256–287.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2017). Performance management: Confronting the challenges for local government. Public Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, T., & Ventresca, M. J. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35(2), 213–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heranz, J. (2010). Network performance and coordination: A theoretical review and framework. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(3), 311–341. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576330301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, M. M., & Piccolo, R. F. (2005). Funding source, board involvement techniques, and financial vulnerability in nonprofit organizations: A test of resource dependence. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16(2), 171–190. doi: 10.1002/nml.99
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, R. P. (1991). Stories managers tell: Why they are as valid as science. Public Administration Review, 51(1), 31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. (1999). Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: The institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management, 24(4), 449–465. doi: 10.1007/s002679900246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. D L. (2008). Performance-based management systems: Effective implementation and maintenance (1st ed.). Boca Raton: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lampkin, L. M., & Boris, E. T. (2002). Nonprofit organization data: What we have and what we need. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(11), 1675–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, K., & O’Brien, C. (2015). Conducting case studies. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, & J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 177–196). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch8.
   Google Scholar
• Minzner, A., Klerman, J. A., Markovitz, C. E., & Fink, B. (2014). The impact of capacity-building programs on nonprofits: A random assignment evaluation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 547–569. doi: 10.1177/0899764013491013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxham, C. (2010). Help or hindrance?: Examining the role of performance measurement in UK nonprofit organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(3), 342–354. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576330302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K., & Caudle, S. (2011). Public performance management systems: Embedding practices for improved success. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(1), 108–132. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576350106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., Aristigueta, M. P., & Hall, J. L. (2014). Managing and measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rabovsky, T. (2014). Support for performance-based funding: The role of political ideology, performance, and dysfunctional information environments. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 761–774. doi: 10.1111/puar.12274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 460–485). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/W_Scott/publication/265348080_Institutional_Theory_Contributing_to_a_Theoretical_Research_Program/links/54de42450cf2966637857c60.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442. doi: 10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). New York, NY: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/institutions-and-organizations/book237665
   Google Scholar
• Selden, S. C., Sowa, J. E., & Sandfort, J. (2006). The impact of nonprofit collaboration in early child care and education on management and program outcomes. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 412–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E., Selden, S. C., & Sandfort, J. R. (2004). No longer unmeasurable? A multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4), 711–728. doi: 10.1177/0899764004269146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strategic Overview of Family League. (2017). Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://familyleague.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Strategic-Overview_Horizontal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance management in the public sector (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woerrlein, L. M., & Scheck, B. (2016). Performance management in the third sector: A literature-based analysis of terms and definitions. Public Administration Quarterly, 40(2), 220–255.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar