Technology and community-engaged research

References

• Israel, R., Schultz, A., Parker, E., Becker, A., Allen, A., & Guzman, R. (2003). Critical issues in developing and following community based participatory research principles. Community-based Participatory Research for Health, 1, 53–76.
   Google Scholar
• Barsky, A. E. (2017). Social work practice and technology: Ethical issues and policy responses. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 35, 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begun, A. L., Berger, L. K., Otto-Salaj, L. L., Rose, S. J. (2010). Developing effective social work university-community research collaborations. Social Work, 55, 54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, J. M., Mendenhall, T. J., & Doherty, W. J. (2009). Using community-based participatory research (CBPR) to target health disparities in families. Family Relations, 58, 475–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddy, J., & Dominelli, L. (2017). Social media and social work: The challenges of a new ethical space. Australian Social Work, 70, 172–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, S., Young, J., & McLeod, D. (2015). Utilizing digital advocacy in community organizing: Lessons learned from organizing in virtual spaces to promote worker rights and economic justice. Journal of Community Practice, 23, 255–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M.E., & Stalker, K. (2018). Assess connect transform in our community: A framework for engaging community partners in community-based participatory research designs. Action Research Journal. doi: 10.1177/1476750318789484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bullock, A., & Colvin, A. (2015). Communication technology integration into social work practice. Advances in Social Work, 16, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Jewkes R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1667–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulton, C. (2005). The place of community in social work practice research: Conceptual and methodological developments. Social Work Research, 29, 73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, M. P. (2005). Technology trends in survey data collection. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 486–501. doi: 10.1177/0894439305278972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. A., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Methods (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, L., Mishna, F., Zhang, V., Van Wert, M., & Bogo, M. (2014). Social media and social work education: Understanding and dealing with the new digital world. Social Work in Health Care, 53, 800–814. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2014.943455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felke, T. (2014). Building capacity for the use of geographic information systems (GIS) in social work planning, practice, and research. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32, 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Flicker, S., Maley, O., Ridgley, A., Biscope, S., Lombardo, C., & Skinner, H. A. (2008). Using technology and participatory action research to engage youth in health promotion. Action Research, 6, 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freisthler, B., Lery, B., Bruenewald, P. J., & Chow, J. (2006). Methods and challenges of analyzing spatial data for social work problems: The case of examining child maltreatment geographically. Social Work Research, 30, 198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman Ross, L., Loup, A., Nelson, R., Botkin, J., Kost, R., Smith Jr., G., & Gehlert. S. (2010). The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research partnership: Points to consider. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 5, 19–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R., Friese, S., & Mangabeira, W. C. (2002). The use of new technology in qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Retrieved from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/847/1840.
   Google Scholar
• Hagey, R. (1997). The use and abuse of participatory action research. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 18, 1–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, B. L. (1992). From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. American Sociologist, 23, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hambridge, K. (2000). Action research. Professional Nurse, 15, 598–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill, K., & Ferguson, S. (2014). Web 2.0 in social work macro practice: Ethical considerations and questions. Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 11, 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, A. (2007). Why social work needs mapping. Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 205–221. doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2007.200500524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessell, L., Smith, V., Jemal, A., & Windsor, L. (2016). Using technology to facilitate collaboration in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Journal of Technology in Human Services, 34, 241–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., Meza, J., Costa, S., Puricelli Perin, D. M., Trout, M., & Rayamajih, A. (2013). The role of information and communication technology in community outreach, academic and research collaboration, and education and support services (IT-CARES). Perspectives in Health Information Management, Fall 2013, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, D. (2004). Representing your community in community-based participatory research: Differences made and measured. Preventing Chronic Disease, 1, A12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst, MA: Center for International Education.
   Google Scholar
• Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). Community based participatory research for health: Process to outcomes (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moylan, C. A., Derr, A. S., & Lindhorst, T. (2015). Increasingly mobile: How new technologies can enhance qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 14, 36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad, M., Wallerstein, N., Sussman, A., Avila, M., Belone, L., & Duran, B. (2015). Reflections on researcher identity and power: The impact of positionality on community based participatory research (CBPR) processes and outcomes. Critical Sociology, 41, 1045–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers, Association of Social Work Boards, Council on Social Work Education, & Clinical Social Work Association. (2017). NASW, ASWB, CSWE, & CWSA Standards for Technology in Social Work Practice. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
   Google Scholar
• Piercy, F., & Thomas, B. (1998). Participatory evaluation research: An introduction for family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 165–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, T. J., Blom-Hoffman, J., Clarke, A. T., Riley-Tillman, T. C., Kelleher, C., & Manz, P. (2005). Reconceptualizing intervention integrity: A partnership-based framework for linking research with practice. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, S., Coe Regan, J. A., Wililams, J. H., Smyth, N., & Bogo, M. (2016). From the editor –The future of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 52, 387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. L. (2017). Innovation or violation? Leveraging mobile technology to conduct socially responsible community research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60, 385–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. B., & Sage, M. (2015). Technology and social work practice: Micro, mezzo, and macro applications. In K. Corcoran & A. Roberts (eds.), Social Worker’s Desk Reference (3rd ed., pp. 176–188). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sitter, K., & Curnew, A. (2016). The application of social media in social work community practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 271–283. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2015.1131257
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. (2017). Social work and digitalisation: Bridging the knowledge gaps. Social Work Education, 36, 869–879. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2017.1361924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, S. (2018). Qualitative geographic information systems (GIS): An untapped research approach for social work. Qualitative Social Work, 17, 9–23. doi: 10.1177/1473325016655203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2013). American community survey 5-year estimates. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2016). Baseline Internet access among ConnectHome communities: Results from a national evaluation of ConnectHome. Retrieved from https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/ConnectHome-Brief.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Unertl, K., Schaefbauer, C., Campbell, T., Senteio, C., Siek, K., Bakken, S., & Veinot, T. (2016). Integrating community-based participatory research and informatics approaches to improve the engagement and health of underserved populations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23, 60–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, N. (2013). Assembling the affective field: How smartphone technology impacts ethnographic research practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 385–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, E. (1994). Introduction to community empowerment, participatory education, and health. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 141–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar