Challenges in Using Big Data to Develop Decision Support Systems for Social Work in Germany

References

• Ackerman, M. S. (2000). The intellectual challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2–3), 179–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barocas, S., & Boyd, D. (2017). Engaging the ethics of data science in practice. Communications of the ACM, 60(11), 23–25. doi:10.1145/3144172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, P. (2014). Statistisch Urteilen: Professionell Handeln. Überlegungen zu einem (scheinbaren) Widerspruch. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpädagogik, 12, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bollier, D. (2010). The promise and peril of big data. Communications and society program. Washington, DC: Aspen Inst.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2015). Undoing the neutrality of big data. Florida Law Review Forum, 67(1), 226–232. Retrieved from www.floridalawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/Boyd_Response_Published.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. Milton Keynes, England: The Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., Miltner, K., & Gray, M. L. (2014). Critiquing big data: Politics, ethics, and epistemology. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1663–1672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukier, K. N., & Mayer-Schöenberger, V. (2013). The rise of big data: How it's changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs, 92, 28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A., Tschantz, M. C., & Datta, A. (2015). Automated experiments on ad privacy settings: A tale of opacity, choice, and discrimination. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2015(1), 92–112. doi:10.1515/popets-2015-0007
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., Dreyfus, S. E., & Athanasiou, T. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission). (2013). Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation: Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. EUR: Vol. 25766. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015). Electronic information systems in human service organisations: The what, who, why and how of information. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1598–1613. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., & Graham, T. (2017). Big data in social welfare: The development of a critical perspective on social work's latest “electronic turn”. Australian Social Work, 70(2), 135–147. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2015.1134606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. (2010). Technikfolgenabschätzung: Eine Einführung (2nd revised ed.). Gesellschaft, Technik, Umwelt: Neue Folge, 1. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, K. (2019). We analyzed 16,625 papers to figure out where AI is headed next. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612768/we-analyzed-16625-papers-to-figure-out-where-ai-is-headed-next/.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. (2014). How big data is unfair. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@mrtz/how-bigdata-is-unfair-9aa544d739de#.l3ia947tq.
   Google Scholar
• Heiner, M. (2011). Diagnostik in der Sozialen Arbeit. In H.-U. Otto & H. Thiersch (Eds.), Handbuch Soziale Arbeit: Grundlagen der Sozialarbeit und Sozialpädagogik (4th ed., pp. 237–250). München, Germany: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Holsapple, C. W. (2008). DSS architecture and types. In F. Burstein & C. Holsapple (Eds.), International handbooks information system. Handbook on decision support systems 1: Basic themes (pp. 163–189). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, S., & Vakkari, P. (2013). “I did it my way”: Social workers as secondary designers of a client information system. Information Processing & Management, 49(1), 380–391. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, S., & Vakkari, P. (2015). Selective clients' trajectories in case files: Filtering out information in the recording process in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 792–808. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, P. G. W. (1987). Decision support systems: The next decade. Decision Support Systems, 3(3), 253–265.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L., & Angwin, J. (2016). How we analyzed the COMPAS recidivism algorithm. Retrieved from https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-analyzed-the-compas-recidivism-algorithm.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T.-P., & Liu, Y.-H. (2018). Research landscape of business intelligence and big data analytics: A bibliometrics study. Expert Systems with Applications, 111, 2–10. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machkovech, S. (2015). Google dev apologizes after Photos app tags black people as “gorillas”. Retrieved from https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/06/google-dev-apologizes-after-photos-app-tags-black-people-as-gorillas/.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, B. (2015). Big data: Using SMART big data, analytics and metrics to make better decisions and improve performance. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Monnickendam, M., Savaya, R., & Waysman, M. (2005). Thinking processes in social workers' use of a clinical decision support system: A qualitative study. Social Work Research, 29(1), 21–30. doi:10.1093/swr/29.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy (First paperback edition). New York, NY: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C., & Schutt, R. (2013). Doing data science. Straight talk from the frontline. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Power, D. J. (2002). Decision support systems: Concepts and resources for managers. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uni.edu/facbook/67/.
   Google Scholar
• Power, D. J. (2008). Decision support systems: A historical overview. In F. Burstein & C. Holsapple (Eds.), International handbooks information system. Handbook on decision support systems 1: Basic themes (pp. 121–140). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (Edición India). Noida, India: Pearson India Education Services Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schrödter, M., Bastian, P., & Taylor, B. (2018). Risikodiagnostik in der Sozialen Arbeit an der Schwelle zum »digitalen Zeitalter« von Big Data Analytics. Preprint. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.22119.14240
   Google Scholar
• Schrödter, M. (2006). Die Herrschaft machtvoller Diagnostik verhindern! Sozial Extra, 30(10), 21–24. doi:10.1007/s12054-006-0272-6
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, U., & Strydom, M. (2018). Evidence-based practice in child protection services: Do we have time for this? Social Work, 54(4), 407–420. doi:10.15270/54-4-669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielkamp, M. (2019). Automating society. Taking stock of automated decision making in the EU: A report by AlgorithmWatch in cooperation with Bertelsmann Stiftung, supported by the Open Society Foundations. Retrieved from www.algorithmwatch.org/automating-society
   Google Scholar
• Utrecht Data School. (2019). DEDA.workshop. Retrieved from https://dataschool.nl/deda/deda-workshop/?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Put, C. E., Hermanns, J., van Rijn-van Gelderen, L., & Sondeijker, F. (2016). Detection of unsafety in families with parental and/or child developmental problems at the start of family support. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 15. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-0715-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 3–13. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig, K. A., Lischka, K., & Fischer, S. (2018). Wo Maschinen irren können: Verantwortlichkeiten und Fehlerquellen in Prozessen algorithmischer Entscheidungsfindung. Arbeitspapier. Retrieved from Bertelsmann-Stiftung website: https://algorithmenethik.de/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2018/02/ZweigADMFehlerquellen_final_ohneCover.pdf.
   Google Scholar