Identifying Practical Knowledge for Introducing Information Systems in Community Social Care Agencies: A Scoping Review

References

• Aasback, A. (2022). Platform social work—A case study of a digital activity plan in the Norwegian Welfare and Labor Administration. Nordic Social Work Research, 12(3), 350–363. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2022.2045212
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Barfoed, E. (2019). Digital clients: An example of people production in social work. Social Inclusion, 7(1), 196–206. doi:10.17645/si.v7i1.1814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children’s statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1046–1064. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J., & van den Broek, D. (2009). Accountable and countable: Information management systems and the bureaucratization of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7), 1326–1342. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrilio, T. (2005). Management information systems: Why are they underutilized in the social services? Administration in Social Work, 29(2), 43–61. doi:10.1300/J147v29n02_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrilio, T. (2008). Accountability, evidence, and the use of information systems in social service programs. Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 135–148. doi:10.1177/1468017307088495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrilio, T., Packard, T., & Clapp, J. D. (2004). Nothing in—Nothing out. Administration in Social Work, 27(4), 61–75. doi:10.1300/J147v27n04_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapham, K., Hasan, H., Fredericks, B., Bessarab, D., Kelly, P., Harwood, V., Dale, E. (2021). Digital support for indigenous research methodologies. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 25, 1–21. doi:10.3127/ajis.v25i0.2885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coursen, D. (2006). An ecosystems approach to human service database design. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 24(1), 1–18. doi:10.1300/J017v24n01_01
   Google Scholar
• Cronley, C., & Patterson, D. (2010). How well does it fit? An organizational culture approach to assessing technology use among homeless service providers. Administration in Social Work, 34(3), 286–303. doi:10.1080/03643107.2010.481194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, J., Devlieghere, J., Roets, G., & Roose, R. (2019). Top-down policy implementation and social workers as institutional entrepreneurs: The case of an electronic information system in Belgium. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(5), 1317–1332. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcy094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, J., Declercq, A., & Hermans, K. (2016). Street-level strategies of child welfare social workers in Flanders: The use of electronic client records in practice. British journal of Social Work, 46(5), 1249–1265. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearman, P. (2005). Computerised social casework recording: Autonomy and control in Australia’s income support agency. Labor Studies Journal, 30(1), 47–65. doi:10.1177/0160449X0503000104
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., Bradt, L., & Roose, R. (2017a). Governmental rationales for installing electronic information systems: A quest for responsive social work. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), 1488–1504. doi:10.1111/spol.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., Bradt, L., & Roose, R. (2017b). Policy rationales for electronic information systems: An area of ambiguity. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(5), 1500–1516. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., Bradt, L., & Roose, R. (2018). Creating transparency through electronic information systems: Opportunities and pitfalls. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(3), 734–750. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., Bradt, L., & Roose, R. (2021). Electronic information systems as means for accountability: Why there is no such thing as objectivity. European Journal of Social Work, 24(2), 212–223. doi:10.1080/13691457.2019.1585335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., & Roose, R. (2018). Electronic information systems: In search of responsive social work. Journal of Social Work, 18(6), 650–665. doi:10.1177/1468017318757296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., & Roose, R. (2019). Documenting practices in human service organisations through information systems: When the quest for visibility ends in darkness. Social Inclusion, 7(1), 207–217. doi:10.17645/si.v7i1.1833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., & Roose, R. (2020). A policy, management and practitioners’ perspective on social work’s rational turn: There are cracks at every level. European Journal of Social Work, 23(1), 144–155. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1460324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessens, K., Saurama, E., & Fargion, S. (2011). Research with social workers to improve their social interventions. European Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 71–88. doi:10.1080/13691457.2010.516629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, D. (2004). Client-controlled case information: A general system theory perspective. Social work, 49(3), 497–505. doi:10.1093/sw/49.3.497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, R., & Stillman, L. (2014). The informationalisation of the Australian community sector. Social Policy and Society, 13(4), 623–634. doi:10.1017/S1474746414000098
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. (2005). Social work’s ‘electronic turn’: Notes on the deployment of information and communication technologies in social work with children and families. Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 529–553. doi:10.1177/0261018305057044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical review of action research: The challenges for researchers and research ethics committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. doi:10.1177/174701611100700305
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2011). Computer-based information systems and Human Service Organisations: Emerging problems and future possibilities. Australian Social Work, 64(3), 299–312. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2010.524705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2013). The development of electronic information systems for the future: Practitioners, ‘embodied structures’ and ‘technologies-in-practice’. British Journal of Social Work, 43(3), 430–445. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014a). Driving child protection reform: Evidence or ideology? Australian Social Work, 67(3), 377–389. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2013.877948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014b). Electronic information systems and social work: Who are we designing for? Practice, 26(5), 313–326. doi:10.1080/09503153.2014.958454
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014c). Information systems and human service organizations: Managing and designing for the “occasional user”. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 38(2), 169–177. doi:10.1080/03643107.2013.859198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014d). Repositioning electronic information systems in human service organizations. Human Services Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 38(2), 125–134. doi:10.1080/03643107.2013.853011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015a). Electronic information systems and human service organizations: The unanticipated consequences of organizational change. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 89–100. doi:10.1080/23303131.2014.987412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015b). Electronic information systems and human services organisations: Avoiding the pitfalls of participatory design. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 651–666. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015c). Electronic information systems and social work: Principles of participatory design for social workers. Advances in Social Work, 16(1), 31–42. doi:10.18060/18244
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015d). Electronic information systems in human service organisations: The what, who, why and how of information. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1598–1613. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015e). Implementing electronic information systems in human service organisations: The challenge of categorisation. Practice, 27(3), 163–175. doi:10.1080/09503153.2015.1014334
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2016a). Electronic information systems and human service organizations: The needs of managers. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(1), 51–61. doi:10.1080/23303131.2015.1069232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2016b). Electronic information systems to guide social work practice: The perspectives of practitioners as end users. Practice, 28(5), 357–372. doi:10.1080/09503153.2015.1135895
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2016c). Technology configuring the user: Implications for the redesign of electronic information systems in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 46(2), 323–338. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2017). Electronic information systems in human service organizations: Using theory to inform future design. International Social Work, 60(1), 100–110. doi:10.1177/0020872814554856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2018). Decision-making about the adoption of information technology in social welfare agencies: Some key considerations. European Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 521–529. doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1297773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2019a). Developments in electronic information systems in social welfare agencies: From simple to complex. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(1), 135–146. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcy014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2019b). From bureaucracy to technocracy in a social welfare agency: A cautionary tale. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 29(2), 108–119. doi:10.1080/02185385.2018.1523023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2021). Practitioner perspectives on the implementation of an electronic information system to enforce practice standards in England. European Journal of Social Work, 24(5), 761–771. doi:10.1080/13691457.2020.1870213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., & Graham, T. (2016). Designing electronic information systems for the future: Social workers and the challenge of New Public Management. Critical Social Policy, 36(2), 187–204. doi:10.1177/0261018315620867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkuhl, G. (2012). From action research to practice research. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 57–77. doi:10.3127/ajis.v17i2.688
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 331(7524), 1064–1065. doi:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, P. (2014). Supporting personalisation: The challenges in translating the expectations of national policy into developments in local services and their underpinning information systems. Social Policy and Society, 13(4), 593–607. doi:10.1017/S147474641400013X
   Google Scholar
• Hood, R., O’Donovan, B., Gibson, J., & Brady, D. (2021). New development: Using the Vanguard Method to explore demand and performance in people-centred services. Public Money & Management, 41(5), 422–425. doi:10.1080/09540962.2020.1815367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoybye-Mortensen, M., & Ejbye-Ernst, P. (2019). What is the purpose? Caseworkers’ perception of performance information. European Journal of Social Work, 22(3), 458–471. doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1366427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, S., & Vakkari, P. (2015). Selective clients’ trajectories in case files: Filtering out information in the recording process in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 792–808. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, S., & Vakkari, P. (2013). “I did it my way”: Social workers as secondary designers of a client information system. Information Processing & Management, 49(1), 380–391. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince, D., & Griffiths, A. (2011). A chronicling system for children’s social work: Learning from the ICS failure. British Journal of Social Work, 41(8), 1497–1513. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyasingham, D. (2020). Entanglements with offices, information systems, laptops and phones: How agile working is influencing social workers’ interactions with each other and with families. Qualitative Social Work, 19(3), 337–358. doi:10.1177/1473325020911697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. B. (2013). A qualitative study of communication among child advocacy multidisciplinary team members using a web-based case tracking system. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 31(4), 355–367. doi:10.1080/15228835.2013.861783
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, R. (2014). One step further from detected contradictions in a child welfare unit—A constructive approach to communicate the needs of social work when implementing ICT in social services. European Journal of Social Work, 17(2), 266–280. doi:10.1080/13691457.2013.802663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagsten, J. (2011). Evaluating information systems according to stakeholders: A pragmatic perspective and method. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 73–88. www.ejise.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lagsten, J. (2012). Thinking about evaluation of information systems that makes work work. Workshop on IT Artefact Design and Workplace Intervention, 10 June, Barcelona. Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet.
   Google Scholar
• Lagsten, J., & Andersson, A. (2018). Use of information systems in social work—Challenges and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 850–862. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1423554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loberg, I. B., & Egeland, C. (2023). ‘You get a completely different feeling’—An empirical exploration of emotions and their functions in digital frontline work. European Journal of Social Work, 26(1), 108–120. doi:10.1080/13691457.2021.2016650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, M. (2001). Third sector: The contribution of non-profit and co-operative enterprises in Australia. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Martikainen, S., Salovaara, S., Ylönen, K., Tynkkynen, E., Viitanen, J., Tyllinen, M., & Lääveri, T. (2022). Social welfare professionals willing to participate in client information system development—Results from a large cross-sectional survey. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 47(4), 389–402. doi:10.1080/17538157.2021.2010736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnickendam, M., Savaya, R., & Waysman, M. (2005). Thinking processes in social workers’ use of a clinical decision support system: A qualitative study. Social Work Research, 29(1), 21–30. doi:10.1093/swr/29.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses, T., Weaver, D., Furman, W., & Duncan, L. (2003). Computerization and job attitudes in child welfare. Administration in Social Work, 27(1), 47–67. doi:10.1300/J147v27n01_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Bloch, C., & Kranz, J. (2015). A framework for rigorously identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews (pp. 1–19). Thirty-sixth International Conference on Information Systems, 13–16 December, Fort Worth, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Khalil, H., Alexander, L., Mclnerney, P., Godfrey, C., … Tricco, A. (2022). What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 950–952. doi:10.11124/JBIES-21-00483
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munro, E. (2004). The impact of audit on social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34(8), 1075–1095. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2005). What tools do we need to improve identification of child abuse? Child Abuse Review, 14(6), 374–388. doi:10.1002/car.921
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011a). The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report: A Child Centred System. www.education.gov.uk/munroreview/.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011b). The Munro review of child protection: Interim report: The child’s journey. www.education.gov.uk/munroreview/.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, L., & Madoc-Jones, I. (2008). Reclaiming information and communication technologies for empowering social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 181–197. doi:10.1177/1468017307084739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2009). Challenges to practice and knowledge in child welfare social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’? Children and Youth Services Review, 31(7), 715–721. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasmore, W. A. (1995). Social science transformed: The socio-technical perspective. Human Relations, 48(1), 1–21. doi:10.1177/001872679504800101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., Pearce, P. F., Ferguson, L. A., & Langford, C. A. (2017). Understanding scoping reviews. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 29(1), 12–16. doi:10.1002/2327-6924.12380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pithouse, A., Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Wastell, D., & White, S. (2012). Trust, risk and the (mis)management of contingency and discretion through new information technologies in children’s services. Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 158–178. doi:10.1177/1468017310382151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolan, G., Evans, J., Bone, J., Lewis, A., Golding, F., Wilson, J., … Reeves, K. (2018). Weapons of affect: The imperative for transdisciplinary information systems design. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 420–429. doi:10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501046
   Google Scholar
• Salovaara, S., & Ylönen, K. (2022). Client information systems’ support for case-based social work: Experiences of Finnish social workers. Nordic Social Work Research, 12(3), 364–378. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2021.1999847
   Google Scholar
• Sarwar, A., & Harris, M. (2019). Children’s services in the age of information technology: What matters most to frontline professionals. Journal of Social Work, 19(6), 699–718. doi:10.1177/1468017318788194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaya, R., Monnickendam, M., & Waysman, M. (2006). Extent and type of worker utilization of an integrated information system in a human services agency. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29(3), 209–216. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaya, R., Spiro, S. E., Waysman, M., & Golan, M. (2004). Issues in the development of a computerized clinical information system for a network of juvenile homes. Administration in Social Work, 28(2), 63–79. doi:10.1300/J147v28n02_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, A.-M. (2009). Mental health workers negotiating risk on the frontline. Australian Social Work, 62(4), 441–459. doi:10.1080/03124070903265724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, J. (2008). Systems thinking in the public sector: The failure of the reform regime and a manifesto for a better way. Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seniutis, M., Petružytė, D., Baltrūnaitė, M., Vainauskaitė, S., & Petkevičius, L. (2021). The impact of information system on interactions of child welfare professionals with managers and clients. Sustainability, 13(12), 6765. doi:10.3390/su13126765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., Bell, M., Sinclair, I., Sloper, P., Mitchell, W., Dyson, P., … Rafferty, J. (2009). An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the integrated children’s system. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 613–626. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Clayden, J. (2010). Technology, evidence and professional practice: Reflections on the integrated children’s system. Journal of Children’s Services, 4(4), 15–27. doi:10.5042/jcs.2010.0018
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. S., & Eaton, T. (2014). Information and communication technology in child welfare. The need for culture-centred computing. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 41(1), 137–160. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol41/iss1/8.
   Google Scholar
• Spensberger, F. (2019). The digitalization of a social work theory: Experiences of a German child welfare social worker. International Social Work, 62(6), 1575–1579. doi:10.1177/0020872819865018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamoulis, D. S. (2020). Information systems for the social administration using the soft systems methodology. International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, 9(1), 1–10. doi:10.1504/IJASS.2020.108655
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, L., Kethers, S., French, R., & Lombard, D. (2009). Adapting corporate modelling for community informatics. VINE, 39(3), 259–274. doi:10.1108/03055720911004003
   Google Scholar
• Stillman, L., & Linger, H. (2009). Community informatics and information systems: Can they be better connected? The Information Society, 25(4), 255–264. doi:10.1080/01972240903028706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman, L., & McGrath, J. (2008). Is it Web 2.0 or is it better information and knowledge that we need? Australian Social Work, 61(4), 421–428. doi:10.1080/03124070802441889
   Google Scholar
• Tjora, A. (2018). Qualitative research as stepwise-deductive induction. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203730072
   Google Scholar
• Tregeagle, S. (2016). Heads in the cloud: An example of practice-based information and communication technology in child welfare. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 34(2), 224–239. doi:10.1080/15228835.2016.1177479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trkman, P. (2010). The critical success factors of business process management. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 125–134. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Schlagwein, D., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Cahalane, M. (2019). Beyond Bourdieu, Foucault and Habermas: Review and assessment of critical information systems research. ACIS 2019 Proceedings. https://aisel.aigsnet.org/acis2019/4.
   Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., Peckover, S., White, S., Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., & Pithouse, A. (2011). Social work in the laboratory: Using microworlds for practice research. British Journal of Social Work, 41(4), 744–760. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., & White, S. (2014a). Beyond bureaucracy: Emerging trends in social care informatics. Health informatics Journal, 20(3), 213–219. doi:10.1177/1460458213487535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., & White, S. (2014b). Making sense of complex electronic records: Socio-technical design in social care. Applied ergonomics, 45(2), 143–149. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., White, S., & Broadhurst, K. (2009). The chiasmus of design: Paradoxical outcomes in the e-government reform of UK children’s services. Springer, 257–272. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02388-0_18
   Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., White, S., Broadhurst, K., Peckover, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010). Children’s services in the iron cage of performance management: Street-level bureaucracy and the spectre of Švejkism. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(3), 310–320. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D. G., McMaster, T., & Kawalek, P. (2007). The rise of the phoenix: Methodological innovation as a discourse of renewal. Journal of Information Technology, 22(1), 59–68. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., Peckover, S., Hall, C., & Pithouse, A. (2009). Whither practice-near research in the modernization programme? Policy blunders in children’s services. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(4), 401–411. doi:10.1080/02650530903374945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Wastell, D., Broadhurst, K., & Hall, C. (2010). When policy o’erleaps itself: The ‘tragic tale’ of the integrated children’s system. Critical Social Policy, 30(3), 405–429. doi:10.1177/0261018310367675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Martin, M., Walsh, S., & Richter, P. (2011). Re-mixing digital economies in the voluntary community sector? Governing identity information and information sharing in the mixed economy of care for children and young people. Social Policy and Society, 10(3), 379–391. doi:10.1017/S1474746411000108
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Walsh, S., & Vaughan, R. (2007). Developing an electronic social care record: A tale from the Tyne. Informatics in Primary Care, 15(4), 239–244. doi:10.14236/jhi.v15i4.664
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wulf, V., Pipek, V., Randall, D., Rohde, M., Schmidt, K., & Stevens, G. (2018). Socio-informatics: A practice-based perspective on the design and use of IT artifacts. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitbasioglu, O., Furneaux, C., & Rossi, S. (2023). Case management systems and new routines in community organisations. Financial Accountability & Management, 39(1), 216–236. doi:10.1111/faam.12297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylönen, K. (in press). The use of electronic information systems in social work. A scoping review of the empirical articles published between 2000 and 2019. European Journal of Social Work, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13691457.2022.2064433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Gutierrez, O. (2007). Information technology acceptance in the social services sector context: An exploration. Social work, 52(3), 221–231. doi:10.1093/sw/52.3.221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., & Andersen, S. T. (2021). ICT-mediated social work practice and innovation: Professionals’ experiences in the Norwegian labour and welfare administration. Nordic Social Work Research, 11(4), 346–360. doi:10.1080/2156857X.2020.1740774
   Google Scholar
• Zorn, T. E. (2003). The emotionality of information and communication technology implementation. Journal of Communication Management, 7(2), 160–171. doi:10.1108/13632540310807296
   Google Scholar