Demand-Driven E-book Program in Tallinn University of Technology Library: The First Two Years of Experience with the EBL Platform

References

• Bunkell, Jonathan, and Sharon Dyas-Correia. “E-Books vs. Print: Which is the Better Value?” Serials Librarian: From the Printed Page to the Digital Age 56, no. 1–4 (2009): 215–219. doi:10.1080/03615260802698283.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Emily K., and Susan L. Kendall. “Identifying Users of Demand-Driven E-Book Programs: Applications for Collection Development.” In Association of College & Research Libraries, ACRL 2013 Proceedings. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2013/papers/ChanKendell_Identifying.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Heting. “Electronic Books: Viewpoints from Users and Potential Users.” Library Hi Tech 21, no. 3 (2003): 340–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830310494526.
   Google Scholar
• Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, Clifton Snyder, and Lawrence Olszewski. “Geographical Representation of Library Collections in WorldCat: A Prototype.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 42, no. 1 (2005): 2–9. doi:10.1002/meet.14504201235.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Tony, and Michelle Morgan. “E-Books Down Under.” Proceedings of the 2013 Charleston Library Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315253.
   Google Scholar
• Ebooks Corporation. “EBL Addresses the Needs of Academic and Research Libraries …” Accessed 29 December 2005 at http://www.eblib.com/?p=about (no longer available), archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20120113102520/http://www.eblib.com/.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Justice. Press release 30/2015. “France and Luxembourg Cannot Apply a Reduced Rate of VAT to the Supply of Electronic Books, in Contrast With Paper Books: Judgments in Cases C-479/13 and C-502/13, Commission v France and Commission v Luxembourg.” http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2015-03/cp150030en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Karen. S., Michael Wright, Kathleen Clatanoff, Hope Barton, and Edward Shreeves. “Give ’Em What They Want: A One-Year Study of Unmediated Patron-Driven Acquisition of E-Books.” College & Research Libraries 73, no. 5 (2012): 469–492. doi:10.5860/crl-297.
   Google Scholar
• Hernon, Peter, Rosita Hopper, Michael R. Leach, Laura L. Saunders, and Jane Zhang. “E-Book Use by Students: Undergraduates in Economics, Literature, and Nursing.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, no 1 (2007): 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Carolyn Ann, and Nancy L. Buchanan. “Use of Electronic Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences,” Library Hi Tech 19, no 4 (2001): 368–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006541.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2014. ISO 11620:2014: Information and documentation—Library Performance Indicators. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• International Publishers Association and Federation of European Publishers. VAT/GST on Books & E-books: An IPA/FEP Global Special Report. 20 July 2015. http://www.internationalpublishers.org/images/VAT2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jõgi, Margit and Kate-Riin Kont. “Reader Surveys and Indicators of Library Statistics: Serving Library Performance Evaluation and Improvement of Service Quality, on the Example of the National Library of Estonia.” In Teenuse kvaliteet: raamatukogutöö tulemuslikkuse näitaja = Service Quality: Library Performance Indicators. Special issue, Acta Bibliothecae Nationalis Estoniae 12 B, Informatsioon ja ühiskond = Information and Society 1 (2009): 151–181.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Peggy. Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management. 3rd ed. Chicago: American Library Association, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Geoff. “A Year of Demand Driven Acquisition of Ebooks at the Open Polytechnic Library.” New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal 52, no. 1 (2010): 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, Allen, et al., eds. Use of Library Materials: The University of Pittsburgh Study. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Levine-Clark, Michael. “Electronic Book Usage: A Survey at the University of Denver.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 6, no. 3 (2006): 285–299. doi: 10.1353/pla.2006.0041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine‐Clark, Michael. “Electronic Books and the Humanities: A Survey at the University of Denver. Collection Building 26, no. 1 (2007): 7–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01604950710721548.
   Google Scholar
• Levine-Clark, Michael. “Developing a Model for Long-Term Management of Demand-Driven Acquisitions.” Against the Grain 23, no. 3 (2011), Article 9. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg/vol23/iss3/9.
   Google Scholar
• Nariani, Rajiv. “E-Books in the Sciences: If We Buy It Will They Use It?” Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 59 (2009). http://hdl.handle.net/10315/2905.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Lesley, and Frances O’Neil. “Electronic Monographs in the Academic Library: An Implementation Story.” LASIE: Library Automated Systems Information Exchange 32, no. 2–3 (2001), 13–20. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=750429377390385;res=IELHSS.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, Judith M., Robert S. Freeman, and Suzanne M. Ward. “Patron-Driven Acquisitions: An Introduction and Literature Review.” Collection Management 35, no. 3–4 (2010): 119–124. doi: /10.1080/01462679.2010.486957.
   Google Scholar
• Poll, Roswitha, Peter te Boekhorst, and Sebastian Mundt. Measuring Quality Performance Measurement in Libraries. 2nd rev. ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Prabha, Chandra G., Duane Rice, and David Cameron. Nonfiction Book Use by Academic Library Users. Research Report Series, OCLC/OR/RR-88/1. Dublin, OH: OCLC-Online Computer Library Center, Office of Research, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Jason, and John McDonald. “Beguiled by Bananas: A Retrospective Study on the Usage and Breadth of Patron vs. Librarian Acquired E-Book Collections.” Paper presented at the 39th Annual Charleston Conference: Issues in Book and Serials Acquisition, 5 November 2009. http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/lea/id/175.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, Sirigindi Subba. “Electronic Books: Their Integration into Library and Information Centers.” The Electronic Library 23, no. 1 (2005): 116–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Leslie J., Carmelita Pickett, Wyoma vanDuinkerken, Jane Smith, Jeanne Harrell, and Sandra Tucker. “User-Driven Acquisitions: Allowing Patron Requests to Drive Collection Development in an Academic Library.” Collection Management 35, no. 3–4 (2010): 244–254. doi:10.1080/01462679.2010.486992.
   Google Scholar
• Sabine, Gordon A., and Patricia L. Sabine. “How People Use Books and Journals.” Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 56, no. 4 (1986): 399–408. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4308046.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Rebecca. “When Patrons Call the Shots: Patron-Driven Acquisition at Brigham Young University.” Collection Building 31, no. 1 (2012): 11–14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01604951211199128.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Lisa, Erin Dorris Cassidy, Eric Elmore, Glenda Griffin, Tyler Manolovitz, Michelle Martinez, and Linda M. Turney. “Head First into the Patron-Driven Acquisition Pool: A Comparison of Librarian Selections Versus Patron Purchases.” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 23, no. 3 (2011): 203–218. doi: 10.1080/1941126X.2011.601224.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, Robert. “Why Aren’t E-Books Gaining More Ground in Academic Libraries? E-Book Use and Perceptions: A Review of Published Literature and Research.” Journal of Web Librarianship 4, no. 4 (2010): 305–331. doi: 10.1080/19322909.2010.525419.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, Nancy, and Ben Hunter. “Assessing E-Books: Taking a Closer Look at E-Book Statistics.” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 32, no. 3–4 (2008): 150–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2008.10766213.
   Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Mary, Carol Mandel, and Paul Kantor. The Online Books Evaluation Project, Columbia University: Final Report. New York: Columbia University, 1999. https://www.academia.edu/1539460/The_online_books_evaluation_project_final_report.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, Lynn. “Collaborating with Our Patrons: Letting the Users Select.” Paper presented at the 11th National Conference of the Association for College and Research Libraries, Charlotte, North Carolina, April 10–13, 2003. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/pdf/lsutton.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Tees, Tracy. “Ereaders in Academic Libraries: A Literature Review.” Australian Library Journal 59, no. 4 (2010): 180–186. doi:10.1080/00049670.2010.10736023.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, R. L. “Some Behavioral Patterns of Library Users: The 80/20 Rule.” Wilson Library Bulletin, 43 (1969): 458–61.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Kizer. “Patron-Driven Acquisition in U.S. Academic Research Libraries: At the Tipping Point in 2011?” Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 36, no. 1 (2012): 125–129.
   Google Scholar
• Way, Doug, and Julie Garrison. “Financial Implications of Demand-Driven Acquisitions: A Case Study of the Value of Short-Term Loans.” In Patron-Driven Acquisitions: History and Best Practices, edited by David A. Swords, 137–156. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, David, and Petra Dumbell. “Ebook Usage at Curtin University Library: Patterns, Projections and Strategy.” Paper presented at a conference of the Victorian Association for Library Automation, 8 February 2010. http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R?func=dbin-jump-full&local_base=gen01-era02&object_id=145452.
   Google Scholar
• Yager, Susan E., and Zsuzsana Szabo. “Using an E-Book to Teach Technology: Effects on Student Performance.” Proceedings of the 49the SIGMIS annual Conference on Computer Personnel Research, San Antonio, TX, USA, May 19–21, 2011, 6–10. doi: 10.1145/1982143.1982146.
   Google Scholar