221
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Environmental Dilemma? Explicating Stakeholder Engagement in Kenyan Firms

, &

References

  • Abdulaziz, N. A., Seine, R., Yau, F., San, O., & Attan, H. (2017). Influence of institutional pressures on the adoption of green initiatives. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(S3), 939–967. Retrieved from: http://www.ijem.upm.edu.my/vol11noS3/(20)%20IJEM%20(S3)%202017%20R2%20Influence%20of%20Institutional%20Pressures%20on%20The%20Adoption%20of%20Green%20Initiatives-old.pdf
  • Adebanjo, D., Teh, P. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2016). The impact of external pressure and sustainable management practices on manufacturing performance and environmental outcomes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(9), 995–1013.
  • Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 1–27.
  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and do not know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.
  • Ahmad, M. S. (2012). Impact of organizational culture on performance management practices in Pakistan. Business Intelligence Journal, 5(1), doi:10.1.1.456.4094, 50–55.
  • Ali, W., & Frynas, J. G. (2018). The role of normative CSR‐promoting institutions in stimulating CSR disclosures in developing countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 373–390.
  • Amran, A., Ooi, S. K., Nejati, M., Zulkafli, A. H., & Lim, B. A. (2012). Relationship of firm attributes, ownership structure and business network on climate change efforts: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(5), 406–414.
  • Aragòn-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A. A., & Vogel, D. (2020). The effects of mandatory and voluntary regulatory pressures on firms’ environmental strategies: A review and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 339–365.
  • Arias, M. E., & Guillen, M. (1998). The transfer of organizational techniques across borders: Combining neo-institutional and comparative perspectives. In J. Alvarez (Ed.), The diffusion and consumption of business knowledge (pp. 110–137). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25899-4_5
  • Arora, P., & De, P. (2020). Environmental sustainability practices and exports: The interplay of strategy and institutions in Latin America. Journal of World Business, 55(4), 1–13.
  • AuYong, H., & Chin, Y. (2019). Cleaner production and sustainability: Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of pollution prevention measures of industrial hazardous waste in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (pp. 1–7). Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/268/1/012027
  • Awan, U., Kraslawski, A., & Huiskonen, J. (2017). Understanding the relationship between stakeholder pressure and sustainability performance in manufacturing firms in Pakistan. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 768–777.
  • Bani-Khalid, T., Kouhy, R., & Hassan, A. (2017). The impact of corporate characteristics on social and environmental disclosure (CSED): The case of Jordan. Journal of Accounting and Auditing: Research & Practice, 1–29. doi:10.5171/2017.369352
  • Barrena-Martinez, J., López-Fernández, M., & Romero-Fernandez, P. M. (2018). Drivers and barriers in socially responsible human resource management. Sustainability, 10(5), 1–14.
  • Betts, T. K., Wiengarten, F., & Tadisina, S. K. (2015). Exploring the impact of stakeholder pressure on environmental management strategies at the plant level: What does industry have to do with it? Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 282–294.
  • Bhatnagar, V. (2017). Evaluating corporate environmental performance in developing countries: TERI’s Eco-Rating System. In M. Bennett, P. James, & L. Klinkers (Eds.), Sustainable measures (pp. 202–220). London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351283007
  • Cho, C. K., Cho, T. S., & Lee, J. (2018). Managerial attributes, consumer proximity, and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 159–169.
  • Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2013). Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 173–189.
  • Coad, A. (2016). Firm age: A survey. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 13–43.
  • Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J., & Strobl, E. (2008). The environmental performance of firms: The role of foreign ownership, training, and experience. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 538–546.
  • Crum, M., Poist, R., Carter, C. R., & Easton, P. L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62.
  • Da Silva Monteiro, S. M., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2009). Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 185–204.
  • Demeter, K., Simpson, D., Power, D., & Samson, D. (2007). Greening the automotive supply chain: A relationship perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(1), 28–48.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101
  • Dixon-Fowler, H. R., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (2017). The role of board environmental committees incorporate environmental performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 423–438.
  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 1–13.
  • Gabaix, X., Landier, A., & Sauvagnat, J. (2013). CEO pay and firm size: An update after the crisis. The Economic Journal, 124(574), F40–F59.
  • González-Benito, J., Lannelongue, G., & Queiruga, D. (2011). Stakeholders and environmental management systems: A synergistic influence on environmental imbalance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(14), 1622–1630.
  • Graham, S. (2017). The influence of external and internal stakeholder pressures on the implementation of upstream environmental supply chain practices. Business & Society, 59(2), 351–383.
  • Guerci, M., Longoni, A., & Luzzini, D. (2015). Translating stakeholder pressures into environmental performance – The mediating role of green HRM practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(2), 262–289.
  • Hadj, T. B. (2020). Effects of corporate social responsibility towards stakeholders and environmental management on responsible innovation and competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 1–10.
  • Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.
  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: An empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 381–395.
  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2007). Environmental management systems and practices: An international perspective. In N. Johnstone (Ed.), Environmental policy and corporate behaviour (pp. 34–87). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
  • Horváthová, E. (2012). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits? Ecological Economics, 84, 91–97.
  • Hyatt, D. G., & Berente, N. (2017). Substantive or symbolic environmental strategies? Effects of external and internal normative stakeholder pressures: Stakeholder pressure and environmental strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1212–1234.
  • Innocent, O. C., & Gloria, O. T. (2018). Effect of corporate governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness of quoted manufacturing firms on the Nigerian stock exchange. Asian Journal of Economics, Business, and Accounting, 8(1), 1–20.
  • Jakhar, S. K., Arijit, B., Himanshu, R., & Kumar, M. S. (2020). Stakeholder pressure for sustainability: Can ‘innovative capabilities’ explain the idiosyncratic response in the manufacturing firms? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2635–2653.
  • Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145–159.
  • Kitsikopoulos, C., Schwaibold, U., & Taylor, D. (2018). Limited progress in sustainable development: Factors influencing the environmental management and reporting of South African JSE-listed companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1295–1301.
  • Lai, K. H., & Wong, C. W. (2012). Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega, 40(3), 267–282.
  • Lammers, J. C., & Garcia, M. A. (2017). Institutional theory approaches. In C. R. Scott, J. R. Barker, T. Kuhn, J. Keyton, P. K. Turner, & L. K. Lewis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1–10). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc113
  • Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board Independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424.
  • Liu, X., Liu, B., Shishime, T., Yu, Q., Bi, J., & Fujitsuka, T. (2017). An empirical study on the driving mechanism of proactive corporate environmental management in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1707–1717.
  • Madsen, H., & Ulhøi, J. (2014). Corporate environmental initiatives in small and medium-sized enterprises and their outcomes: A longitudinal study. Business Strategy And The Environment, 25(2), 92–101.
  • Mathers, N., Fox, N., & Hunn, A. (2007). Surveys and questionnaires. National Institute for Health Research. Retrieved from: www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/12_Surveys_and_Questionnaires_Revision_2009.pdf
  • Miska, C., Szőcs, I., & Schiffinger, M. (2018). Culture’s effects on corporate sustainability practices: A multi-domain and multi-level view. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 263–279.
  • Mungai, E., Ndiritu, S., & Rajwani, T. (2020). Do voluntary environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Evidence from waste management by Kenyan firms. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 265, 1–12.
  • Nakamura, M., Takahashi, T., & Vertinsky, I. (2001). Why Japanese firms choose to certify: A study of managerial responses to environmental issues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42(1), 23–52.
  • Nandi, S., & Ghosh, S. (2013). Corporate governance attributes, firm characteristics and the level of corporate disclosure: Evidence from the Indian listed firms. Decision Science Letters, 2(1), 45–58.
  • Neubaum, D. O., Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. B. (2012). Balancing natural environmental concerns of internal and external stakeholders in family and non-family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(1), 28–37.
  • Nunes, J. R., da Silva, J. E., da Silva, M., & Giannetti, B. F. (2019). Cleaner production in small companies: Proposal of a management methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 357–366.
  • Nurlaila, L. A. (2017). The influence of stakeholder pressure and environmental performance on corporate social and environmental disclosure and its implication on the value of the firm. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(15), 353–369. Retrieved from: http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/3965/1/INT%20JURNAL.pdf
  • Ofoegbu, G. N., Odoemelam, N., & Okafor, R. G. (2018). Corporate board characteristics and environmental disclosure quantity: Evidence from South Africa (integrated reporting) and Nigeria (traditional reporting). Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1–28.
  • Osabutey, E., & Croucher, R. (2018). Intermediate institutions and technology transfer in developing countries: The case of the construction industry in Ghana. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 154–163.
  • Qi, G. Y., Shen, L. Y., Zeng, S. X., & Jorge, O. J. (2010). The drivers for contractors’ green innovation: An industry perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(14), 1358–1365.
  • Ramanathan, R., Poomkaew, B., & Nath, P. (2014). The impact of organizational pressures on environmental performance of firms. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(2), 169–182.
  • Reyes-Rodríguez, J. F., Ulhøi, J. P., & Madsen, H. (2014). Corporate environmental sustainability in Danish SMEs: A longitudinal study of motivators, initiatives, and strategic effects. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(4), 193–212.
  • Rouf, D. (2011). Corporate characteristics, governance attributes and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Bangladesh. African Journal of Business Management, 5(19), 7836–7845. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2568480
  • Rudyanto, A., & Veronica Siregar, S. (2018). The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(2), 233–249.
  • Rui, Z., & Lu, Y. (2020). Stakeholder pressure, corporate environmental ethics and green innovation. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 29(1), 70–86.
  • Sandhu, S., Smallman, C., Ozanne, L. K., & Cullen, R. (2012). Corporate environmental responsiveness in India: Lessons from a developing country. Journal of Cleaner Production, 34, 203–213.
  • Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176.
  • Scaringelli, M. (2014). Are the foreign controlled firms more environmentally sustainable than domestically controlled ones? Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 4(2), 131–146.
  • Shahab, M. A., Sobari, A., & Udin, U. (2018). Empowering leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating roles of psychological empowerment and emotional intelligence in medical service industry. European Research Studies, 21, 403–412. Retrieved from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/5cca42853a2a8258b6a26e61497b8a33/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=60370
  • Tang, Z., & Tang, J. (2017). Stakeholder corporate social responsibility orientation congruence, entrepreneurial orientation and environmental performance of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 634–651.
  • Tatoglu, E., Bayraktar, E., & Arda, O. (2015). Adoption of corporate environmental policies in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 313–326.
  • Tatoglu, E., Frynas, J. G., Bayraktar, E., Demirbag, M., Sahadev, S., Doh, J., & Koh, S. C. (2019). Why do emerging market firms engage in voluntary environmental management practices? A strategic choice perspective. British Journal of Management, 31(1), 80–100.
  • Tong, R. (2018). Feminist thought, student economy edition: A more comprehensive introduction. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.
  • Vinayagamoorthi, V., Murugesan, S., & Kasilingam, L. (2015). Impact of firms’ profitability on environmental performance: Evidence from companies in India. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 109–119.
  • Wang, J., Zhang, Y., & Goh, M. (2020). Moderating the role of firm size in sustainable performance improvement through sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability, 10(5), 1–14.
  • Yusof, N., Abidin, N. Z., & Iranmanesh, M. (2016). Environmental practices in construction firms. Procedia Engineering, 145, 242–249.
  • Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Iranmanesh, M., Shaharudin, M. R., & Sia Chong, Y. (2015). Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: The Malaysian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1115–1122.
  • Zaman, A. U. (2015). A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: Lessons learned and guidelines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 12–25.
  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4333–4335.
  • Zhu, Q., Feng, Y., & Choi, S. (2017). The role of customer relational governance in environmental and economic performance improvement through green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155(2), 46–53.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.