The cognition of change: scaling deformations in mind and spatial theories

References

• Brugman, C., and G. Lakoff. 1988. “Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks.” In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Artificial Intelligence, edited by S. Small, G. Cottrell, and M. Tanenhaus, 477–507. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. D. 1987. “Some Multidimensional Scaling and Related Procedures Devised at Bell Laboratories, with Ecological Applications.” In Developments in Numerical Ecology, edited by P. Legendre and L. Legendre, 65–138. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A. G. 2008. “Conceptual Neighborhood.” In Encyclopedia of GIS, edited by S. Shekhar and H. Xiong, 123. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, A. G., and J. Renz. 2008. “Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning.” In Handbook of Knowledge Representation, edited by F. van Harmelen, V. Lifschitz, and B. Porter, 551–596. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Coventry, K. R., and S. C. Garrod. 2004. Saying, Seeing and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Z., A. G. Cohn, and D. A. Randell. 1992. “Qualitative Simulation Based on a Logical Formalism of Space and Time.” 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, July 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Do, A. M., A. V. Rupert, and G. Wolford. 2008. “Evaluations of Pleasurable Experiences: The Peak-End Rule.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (1): 96–98. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. J., and K. K. Al-Taha. 1992. “Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships.” In From Space to Territory: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, edited by A. Frank, I. Campari, and U. Formentini, 196–219. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. J., and R. D. Franzosa. 1991. “Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations.” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5 (2): 161–174. doi:10.1080/02693799108927841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. J., and D. M. Mark. 1995a. “Modelling Conceptual Neighbourhoods of Topological Line-Region Relations.” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9 (5): 555–565. doi:10.1080/02693799508902056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. J., and D. M. Mark. 1995b. “Naive Geography.” In Spatial Information Theory - A Theoretical Basis for GIS, edited by A. Frank and W. Kuhn, 1–15. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. J., and A. R. Shariff. 1998. “Metric Details for Natural-Language Spatial Relations.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 16 (4): 295–321. doi:10.1145/291128.291129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freksa, C. 1992. “Temporal Reasoning Based on Semi-Intervals.” Artificial Intelligence 54 (1–2): 199–227. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(92)90090-K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galton, A. 2003. “A Generalized Topological View of Motion in Discrete Space.” Theoretical Computer Science 305 (1–3): 111–134. doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(02)00701-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld, L., and S. Gelman. 1994. “Towards a Topography of Mind: An Introduction to Domain Specificity.” In Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, edited by L. A. Hirschfeld and S. A. Gelman, 3–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, A. 2012. “Spatial Information Theory Meets Spatial Thinking: Is Topology the Rosetta Stone of Spatio-Temporal Cognition?” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (6): 1310–1328. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.702481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., and R. Li. 2009. “The Endpoint Hypothesis: A Topological-Cognitive Assessment of Geographic Scale Movement Patterns.” In 9th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory, COSIT 2009, edited by K. S. Hornsby, C. Claramunt, M. Denis, and G. Ligozat, 177–194. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., R. Li, J. Yang, F. Hardisty, and S. Xu. 2013. “The Egenhofer–Cohn Hypothesis: Or, Topological Relativity?” In Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space - New Perspectives on Geographic Information Research, edited by M. Raubal, A. Frank, and D. Mark, 195–215. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., M. Worboys, and M. Duckham. 2008. “Identifying Factors of Geographic Event Conceptualisation.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 22 (2): 183–204. doi:10.1080/13658810701405607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauff, M., R. Rauh, and J. Renz. 1997. “A Cognitive Assessment of Topological Spatial Relations: Results from an Empirical Investigation.” In Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, edited by S. C. Hirtle and A. U. Frank, 193–206. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lautenschütz, A.-K., C. Davies, M. Raubal, A. Schwering, and E. Pederson. 2007. “The Influence of Scale, Context and Spatial Preposition in Linguistic Topology.” In Spatial Cognition V - Reasoning, Action, Interaction, edited by T. Barkowsky, M. Knauff, G. Ligozat, and D. R. Montello, 439–452. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, B., and F. Fonseca. 2006. “TDD: A Comprehensive Model for Qualitative Spatial Similarity Assessment.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 6 (1): 31–62. doi:10.1207/s15427633scc0601_2.
   Google Scholar
• Mani, I., and J. Pustejovsky. 2012. Interpreting Motion: Grounded Representations for Spatial Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M. 1999. “Spatial Representation: A Cognitive View.” In Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications, edited by P. A. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maquire, and D. W. Rhind, 81–89. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., and M. J. Egenhofer. 1994. “Calibrating the Meanings of Spatial Predicates from Natural Language: Line-Region Relations.” Proceedings of Sixth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling 1: 538–553.
   Google Scholar
• Mennis, J. L., D. J. Peuquet, and L. Qian. 2000. “A Conceptual Framework for Incorporating Cognitive Principles into Geographical Database Representation.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14 (6): 501–520. doi:10.1080/136588100415710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, P. 2002. “Topological Spatio-Temporal Reasoning and Representation.” Computational Intelligence 18 (3): 420–450. doi:10.1111/1467-8640.00196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock Jr, B. B. 1962. “The Serial Position Effect of Free Recall.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (5): 482–488. doi:10.1037/h0045106.
   Google Scholar
• Randell, D. A., Z. Cui, and A. G. Cohn. 1992. “A Spatial Logic Based on Regions and Connection.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, edited by B. Nebel, C. Rich, and W. Swartout, 165–176. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• R-Development-Core-Team. 2005. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Regier, T., and M. Zheng. 2007. “Attention to Endpoints: A Cross‐Linguistic Constraint on Spatial Meaning.” Cognitive Science 31 (4): 705–719. doi:10.1080/15326900701399954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. B. 1990. “Interactive Machine Acquisition of a Fuzzy Spatial Relation.” Computers & Geosciences 16 (6): 857–872. doi:10.1016/0098-3004(90)90008-H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, T. F. 2008. “An Invitation to an Event.” In Understanding Events: From Perception to Action: From Perception to Action, edited by T. F. Shipley and J. M. Zacks, 3–30. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward Jr, J. H., and M. E. Hook. 1963. “Application of an Hierarchical Grouping Procedure to a Problem of Grouping Profiles.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 23: 69–81. doi:10.1177/001316446302300107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M. 2004. “Using Movement and Intentions to Understand Simple Events.” Cognitive Science 28 (6): 979–1008. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2806_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, F. B. 2003. “Cognitive Evidence of Vagueness Associated with Some Linguistic Terms in Descriptions of Spatial Relations.” Spatial Cognition & Computation 3 (2–3): 241–257. doi:10.1080/13875868.2003.9683764.
   Google Scholar