Finding meaningful participation in volunteer geographic information and citizen science: a case comparison in environmental application

References

• Adams, S. A. 2014. “Maintaining the Collision of Accounts: Crowdsourcing Sites in Health Care as Brokers in the Co-production of Pharmaceutical Knowledge.” Information, Communication & Society 17 (6): 657–669. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.808362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ades, A. E. 2003. “A Chain of Evidence with Mixed Comparisons: Models for Multi‐parameter Synthesis and Consistency of Evidence.” Statistics in Medicine 22 (19): 2995–3016. doi:10.1002/sim.1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P., and D. Waldorf. 1981. “Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling.” Sociological Methods & Research 10 (2): 141–163. doi:10.1177/004912418101000205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilotta, G. S., A. M. Milner, and I. Boyd. 2014. “On the Use of Systematic Reviews to Inform Environmental Policies.” Environmental Science & Policy 42: 67–77. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K. V. Rosenberg, and J. Shirk. 2009. “Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy.” BioScience 59 (11): 977–984. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordogna, G., P. Carrara, L. Criscuolo, M. Pepe, and A. Rampini. 2016. “On Predicting and Improving the Quality of Volunteer Geographic Information Projects.” International Journal of Digital Earth 9 (2): 134–155. doi:10.1080/17538947.2014.976774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott, M., B.-S. Gigler, and G. Young, eds. 2014. “The Role of Crowdsourcing for Better Governance in Fragile State Contexts.” In Closing the Feedback Loop: Can Technology Bridge the Accountability Gap?, edited by B.-S. Gigler and S. Bailur, 107–148. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Boulos, K. M., S. Wheeler, C. Tavares, and R. Jones. 2011. “How Smartphones Are Changing the Face of Mobile and Participatory Healthcare: An Overview, with Example from eCAALYX.” BioMedical Engineering OnLine 10: 24. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-10-24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandeis, M. W., and T. Nyerges. 2016. “Assessing Resistance to Volunteered Geographic Information Reporting within Local Government.” Transactions in GIS 20: 203–220. doi:10.1111/tgis.12168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinberg, D., and J. E. McGrath. 1985. Validity and the Research Process. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bücheler, T., and J. H. Sieg. 2011. “Understanding Science 2.0: Crowdsourcing and Open Innovation in the Scientific Method.” Procedia Computer Science 7: 327–329. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.09.014.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. C., and K. G. Hilchey. 2011. “A Review of Citizen Science and Community-Based Environmental Monitoring: Issues and Opportunities.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176 (1–4): 273–291. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., and D. T. Campbell. 1979. Quasi-experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsen, F., A. E. Jensen, P. A. Alviola, D. S. Balete, M. Mendoza, A. Tagtag, C. Custodio, and M. Enghoff. 2005. “Does Monitoring Matter? A Quantitative Assessment of Management Decisions from Locally-Based Monitoring of Protected Areas.” Biodiversity and Conservation 14 (11), 2633–2652. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-8392-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. L., and R. Bonney. 2015. Citizen Science. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eveleigh, A. 2014. “Crowding Out the Archivist? Locating Crowdsourcing within the Broader Landscape of Participatory Archives.” Chap. 9 in Crowdsourcing Our Cultural Heritage, edited by Mia Ridge, 211–229. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2007. “Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography.” GeoJournal 69 (4): 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., V. Antoniou, S. Basiouka, R. Soden, & P. Mooney. 2014. Crowdsourced Geographic Information Use in Government. Report to GFDRR. London: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1999. “Knowledge Élites and Class War.” Nature 401 (6753): 531. doi:10.1038/44021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joas, M. 2001. “Democratic and Environmental Effects of Local Agenda 21: A Comparative Analysis over Time.” Local Environment 6 (2): 213–221. doi:10.1080/13549830120052836.
   Google Scholar
• Laird, F. N. 1993. “Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making.” Science, Technology & Human Values 18 (3): 341–361. doi:10.1177/016224399301800305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. 2006. “‘No Personal Motive?’ Volunteers, Biodiversity, and the False Dichotomies of Participation.” Ethics, Place & Environment 9 (3): 279–298. doi:10.1080/13668790600893319.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., I. Scoones, and B. Wynne. 2005. Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K., J. Martínez, and J. J. Verplanke. 2015. “Shifting Boundaries of Volunteered Geographic Information Systems and Modalities: Learning from PGIS.” ACME: An International E–Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (3): 791–826. http://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/acme/article/view/1234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatsu, R. T., E. B. Grossman, and C. L. Iacovou. 2014. “A Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Based on Task Complexity.” Journal of Information Science 40 (6): 823–834. doi:10.1177/0165551514550140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poteete, A. R., and E. Ostrom. 2008. “Fifteen Years of Empirical Research on Collective Action in Natural Resource Management: Struggling to Build Large-N Databases Based on Qualitative Research.” World Development 36 (1): 176–195. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, A., A. Rashid Kausar, and D. Paul. 2007. “The Social Democratization of Knowledge: Some Critical Reflections on E-Learning.” Multicultural Education & Technology Journal 1 (1): 64–74. doi:10.1108/17504970710745210.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. 2008. “Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review.” Biological Conservation 141 (10): 2417–2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. 2004. “Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation.” The American Review of Public Administration 34 (4): 315–353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. Frewer. 2004. “Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda.” Science, Technology & Human Values 29 (4): 512–556. doi:10.1177/0162243903259197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, H. E., M. J. O. Pocock, C. D. Preston, D. B. Roy, J. Savage, J. C. Tweddle, and L. D. Robinson. 2012. Understanding Citizen Science & Environmental Monitoring. Final Report on behalf of UK-EOF. London: NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Natural History Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Rudel, T. K. 2008. “Meta-analyses of Case Studies: A Method for Studying Regional and Global Environmental Change.” Global Environmental Change 18 (1): 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman, T. A., and W. Ascher. 1997. “Public Involvement Methods in Natural Resource Policy Making: Advantages, Disadvantages and Trade-Offs.” Policy Sciences 30 (2): 71–90. doi:10.1023/A:1004246421974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toogood, M. 2013. “Engaging Publics: Biodiversity Data Collection and the Geographies of Citizen Science.” Geography Compass 7 (9): 611–621. doi:10.1111/gec3.12067.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. K. 1985. “Pattern Matching, Validity, and Conceptualization in Program Evaluation.” Evaluation Review 9 (5): 575–604. doi:10.1177/0193841X8500900503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch, A. I. T., H. P. Possingham, L. N. Joseph, J. Szabo, and T. G. Martin. 2013. “Realising the Full Potential of Citizen Science Monitoring Programs.” Biological Conservation 165: 128–138. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, J. M., and B. C. Fischer. 2014. “A Protocol for Citizen Science Monitoring of Recently-Planted Urban Trees.” Cities and the Environment (CATE) 7 (2): 4.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, D., and C. Van Fleet. 2005. “The Democratization of Information? Wikipedia as a Reference Resource.” Reference & User Services Quarterly 45 (2): 100–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20864471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, A., and K. Crowston. 2011. “From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science.” 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, January 4–7. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.207.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, A., and K. Crowston. 2015. “Surveying the Citizen Science Landscape.” First Monday 20 (1). doi:10.5210/fm.v20i1.5520.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Vol. 5. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar