Geo-questionnaires in urban planning: recruitment methods, participant engagement, and data quality

References

• Barron, C., P. Neis, and A. Zipf. 2014. “A Comprehensive Framework for Intrinsic OpenStreetMap Quality Analysis.” Transactions in GIS 18 (6): 877–895. doi:10.1111/tgis.12073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorski, D. 2014. “Poles and Communication Technology - Access Conditions and Modes of Use.” In Social Diagnosis 2013. The Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland, edited by J. Czapiński and T. Panek, 335–359. Warsaw: The Council for Social Monitoring. http://www.diagnoza.com/data/report/report_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. 2009. Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. 2012. “An Empirical Evaluation of the Spatial Accuracy of Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) Data.” Applied Geography 34 (2): 289–294. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., M. Kelly, and D. Whitall. 2013. “Which ‘public’? Sampling Effects in Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) Systems for Public Lands Management.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57 (2): 190–214. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.741045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and M. Kyttä. 2014. “Key Issues and Research Priorities for Public Participation GIS (PPGIS): A Synthesis Based on Empirical Research.” Applied Geography 46: 122–136. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and P. Reed. 2009. “Public Participation GIS : A New Method for Use in National Forest Planning.” Forest Science 55 (2): 166–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., P. Reed, and C. Harris. 2002. “Testing a Place-Based Theory for Environmental Evaluation: An Alaska Case Study.” Applied Geography 22: 49–76. doi:10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00019-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., D. Weber, and K. de Bie. 2015. “Is PPGIS Good Enough? An Empirical Evaluation of the Quality of PPGIS Crowd-Sourced Spatial Data for Conservation Planning.” Land Use Policy 43: 228–238. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., D. Weber, D. Zanan, and K. de Bie. 2012. “Evaluation of an Online (Opt-in) Panel for Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Surveys.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24 (4): 534–545. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, S. 2001. “The Future of Participatory Approaches Using Geographic Information: Developing a Research Agenda for the 21 St Century.” URISA Journal 15 (Special Issue: Access And Participation Approaches 1): 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office of Poland. “Local Data Bank” [in Polish]. 2015. Accessed September 20, 2015. https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/start
   Google Scholar
• Chaix, B., Y. Kestens, C. Perchoux, N. Karusisi, J. Merlo, and K. Labadi. 2012. “An Interactive Mapping Tool to Assess Individual Mobility Patterns in Neighborhood Studies.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 43 (4): 440–450. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. J., Y. Georgiadou, J. Labonte. 2009. “Volunteered Geographic Information: The Nature and Motivation of Produsers.” International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 4: 332–358. doi:10.2902/1725-0463.2009.04.art16
   Google Scholar
• Craig, W., T. Harris, and D. Weiner. 2002. Community Participation and GIS. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Czepkiewicz, M., M. Młodkowski, Z. Zwoliński, and P. Jankowski. 2015. “Eliciting Residents’ Preferences for Urban Function Change Using Online Geo-Questionnaires.” Paper presented at The 18th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Lisbon, June 9–12. https://agile-online.org/index.php/conference/proceedings/proceedings-2015
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., M. F. Goodchild, and D. Z. Sui. 2012. “Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3): 571–590. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.595657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, R. D. Jr. 2008. “Sampling Methods for Web and E-Mail Surveys.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, edited by N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, and G. Blank, 195–217. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, R. 2011. “Politics and Power in Participation and GIS Use for Community Decision Making.” In The SAGE Handbook of GIS and Society, edited by T. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, and R. McMaster, 347–360. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Haybatollahi, M., M. Czepkiewicz, T. Laatikainen, and M. Kyttä. 2015. “Neighbourhood Preferences, Active Travel Behaviour, and Built Environment: An Exploratory Study.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 29: 57–69. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2004. “Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century.” Planning Theory & Practice 5 (4): 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P. 2009. “Towards Participatory Geographic Information Systems for Community-Based Environmental Decision Making.” Journal of Environmental Management 90 (6): 1966–1971. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P., M. Czepkiewicz, M. Młodkowski, and Z. Zwoliński. 2015. “Geo-questionnaire: A Method and Tool for Public Preference Elicitation in Land Use Planning.” Transactions in GIS. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/tgis.12191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahila, M., and M. Kyttä. 2009. “SoftGIS as a Bridge Builder in Collaborative Urban Planning.” In Planning Support Systems: Best Practices and New Methods, edited by S. Geertman and J. Stillwell, 389–412, Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kahila-Tani, M., A. Broberg, and M. Kyttä. 2015. “Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process.” Planning Practice & Research 31 (2): 195–214. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N. 2007. “Spatial Sampling Design for a Demographic and Health Survey.” Population Research and Policy Review 26: 581–599. doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9044-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., A. Broberg, M. Haybatollahi, and K. Schmidt-Thomé. 2015. “Urban Happiness: Context-Sensitive Study of the Social Sustainability of Urban Settings.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 47: 1–24. doi:10.1177/0265813515600121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., A. Broberg, T. Tzoulas, and K. Snabb. 2013. “Towards Contextually Sensitive Urban Densification: Location-Based softGIS Knowledge Revealing Perceived Residential Environmental Quality.” Landscape and Urban Planning 113: 30–46. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., M. Kahila, and A. Broberg. 2011. “Perceived Environmental Quality as an Input to Urban Infill Policy-Making.” URBAN DESIGN International 16 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1057/udi.2010.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, A. M., C. M. Raymond, V. M. Adams, M. Polyakov, A. Gordon, J. R. Rhodes, M. Mills, A. Stein, C. D. Ives, and E. C. Lefroy. 2014. “Characterizing Spatial Uncertainty When Integrating Social Data in Conservation Planning.” Conservation Biology 28 (6): 1497–1511. doi:10.1111/cobi.12409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K., and C. E. Dunn. 2012. “Geo-Information Tools for Participatory Spatial Planning: Fulfilling the Criteria for ‘Good’ Governance?” Geoforum 43 (1): 81–94. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, C.-Y. J., K. L. Lee, and G. M. Ingersoll. 2002. “An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting.” The Journal of Educational Research 96 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1080/00220670209598786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantanen, H., and M. Kahila. 2009. “The SoftGIS Approach to Local Knowledge.” Journal of Environmental Management 90 (6): 1981–1990. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinner, C. 2001. “Argumentation Maps: GIS-Based Discussion Support for On-Line Planning.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28 (6): 847–863. doi:10.1068/b2748t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruel, E., W. E. Wagner III, and B. J. Gillespie. 2015. The Practice of Survey Research. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Salonen, M., A. Broberg, M. Kyttä, and T. Toivonen. 2014. “Do Suburban Residents Prefer the Fastest or Low-Carbon Travel Modes? Combining Public Participation GIS and Multimodal Travel Time Analysis for Daily Mobility Research.” Applied Geography 53: 438–448. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlossberg, M., and E. Shuford. 2005. “Delineating ‘Public’ and ‘Participation’ in PPGIS.” URISA Journal 16 (2): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. 2015. Penetration of leading social networks in Poland as of 4th quarter 2014. http://www.statista.com/statistics/284441/poland-social-network-penetration/
   Google Scholar
• Sułek, A. 2014. “Civil Experience, Activities for the Benefit of the Community and Civil Skills.” In Social Diagnosis 2013. The Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland, edited by J. Czapiński and T. Panek. Warsaw: The Council for Social Monitoring. http://www.diagnoza.com/data/report/report_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. 2005. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2000. “Bottom-up GIS: A New Tool for Individual and Group Expression in Participatory Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (3): 279–294. doi:10.1080/01944360008976107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, S., A. E. Buijs, F. Langers, H. Farjon, A. Van Hinsberg, and F. J. Sijtsma. 2013. “Measuring the Attractiveness of Dutch Landscapes: Identifying National Hotspots of Highly Valued Places Using Google Maps.” Applied Geography 45: 220–229. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar