Measuring the influence of map label density on perceived complexity: a user study using eye tracking

References

• Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., Voss, H., Bernardo, F., Hipolito, J., & Kretchmer, U. (2002). Testing the usability of interactive maps in CommonGIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29(4), 325–342.
   Google Scholar
• Backs, R. W., & Walrath, L. C. (1992). Eye movement and pupillary response indices of mental workload during visual search of symbolic displays. Applied Ergonomics, 23(4), 243–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartz, B. S. (1970). An analysis of the typographic legibility literature: Assessment of its applicability to cartography. The Cartographic Journal, 7(1), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boots, B. N., & Getis, A. (1988). Point pattern analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, D. M. (1980). Some reflections on the complexity of maps. In Technical papers of ACSM 40th Annual Meeting, (pp. 343–352). Falls Church, VA: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, R. L., & Lloyd, R. E. (2006). The cognitive load of geographic information. The Professional Geographer, 58(2), 209–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castner, H. W., & Eastman, R. J. (1984). Eye-movement parameters and perceived map complexity—I. The American Cartographer, 11(2), 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castner, H. W., & Eastman, R. J. (1985). Eye-movement parameters and perceived map complexity—II. The American Cartographer, 12(1), 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-C., Song, H., Lau, W. Y., Wong, K. F. E., & Tang, S. L. (2003). Developmental characteristics of eye movements in reading Chinese. In C. McBride-Chang & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp. 157–169). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., Marks, J., & Shieber, S. (1995). An empirical study of algorithms for point-feature label placement. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 14(3), 203–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cöltekin, A., Heil, B., Garlandini, S., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of interactive map interface designs: A case study integrating usability metrics with eye-movement analysis. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36(1), 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeb, R., Ooms, K., Van Eetvelde, V., & Maeyer, P. D. (2015). Towards a deeper understanding of cartographic text visualisation: Assessment of user preferences and colour influence. The Cartographic Journal, 52(4), 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donderi, D. C. (2006). Visual complexity: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 73–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, W., Zhang, S., Liao, H., Liu, Z., Li, Z., & Yang, X. (2016). Assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of map colour for colour impairments using an eye-tracking approach. The Cartographic Journal, 53(2), 166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois, M. (2013). Complexity and salience: Evaluating the inter-scene variability of animated choropleth maps. ( Master's Thesis). University of South Carolina, Columbia. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1278.
   Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, M., Touya, G., & Duchêne, C. (2016, June) Assessing the variation of visual complexity in multi-scale maps with clutter measures. Paper presented at the AGILE workshop on “Automated generalisation for on-demand mapping” and 19th ICA Workshop on “Generalisation and Multiple Representation”, Helsinki. https://kartographie.geo.tu-dresden.de/downloads/ica-gen/workshop2016/genemr2016_paper_05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, D. (1993). On the nature of cartographic text. The Cartographic Journal, 30(2), 104–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, D. (2006). Measuring map complexity. The Cartographic Journal, 43(3), 224–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, C., & Schweikart, J. (2017). Mental representation of landmarks on maps – Investigating cartographic visualization methods with eye tracking technology. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 17(1–2), 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlandini, S., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of visual variables for geographic information visualization. In K. S. Hornsby, C. Claramunt, M. Denis, & G. Ligozat (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 195–211). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., & Kotval, X. P. (1999). Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6), 631–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. L., Robinson, A. C., & Roth, R. E. (2017). Envisioning the future of cartographic research. International Journal of Cartography, 3(S1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Harrie, L., & Stigmar, H. (2010). An evaluation of measures for quantifying map information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(3), 266–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrie, L., Stigmar, H., & Djordjevic, M. (2015). Analytical estimation of map readability. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(2), 418–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrower, M. (2007). The cognitive limits of animated maps. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 42(4), 349–357.
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 20–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4), 441–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kameda, T., & Keiko, I. (2003). Map label placement for points and curves. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, 86(4), 835–840.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, P., Giannopoulos, I., Duchowski, A., & Raubal, M. (2016). Measuring cognitive load for map tasks through pupil diameter. In J. Miller, J., D. O' Sullivan, & N. Wiegand (Eds.), (pp. 323–337). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koláčný, A. (1969). Cartographic information—A fundamental concept and term in modern cartography. The Cartographic Journal, 6(1), 47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., & Huang, P. (2002). Quantitative measures for spatial information of maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16(7), 699–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., Dong, W., Peng, C., & Liu, H. (2017). Exploring differences of visual attention in pedestrian navigation when using 2D maps and 3D geo-browsers. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44(6), 474–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Dong, W., & Meng, L. (2017). Using eye tracking to explore the guidance and constancy of visual variables in 3D visualization. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(9), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R. (1997). Visual search processes used in map reading. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 34(1), 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lobo, M.-J., Pietriga, E., & Appert, C. (2015). An evaluation of interactive map comparison techniques. In CHI ‘15 Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ‘15 Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3573–3582). New York: ACM..
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (1982a). Map complexity: Comparison and measurement. The American Cartographer, 9(1), 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (1982b). The role of complexity and symbolization method in thematic map effectiveness. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72(4), 495–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, S. M., Kne, L., Dyke, K. R., Shannon, J., & Eria, S. (2012). Using eye-tracking and mouse metrics to test usability of web mapping navigation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 39(1), 48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (2002). Cognitive map-design research in the twentieth century: Theoretical and empirical approaches. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29(3), 283–304.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Diego, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J. M. (1975). Autocorrelation and visual map complexity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 65(2), 189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooms, K., De Maeyer, P., Fack, V., Van Assche, E., & Witlox, F. (2012a). Interpreting maps through the eyes of expert and novice users. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(10), 1773–1788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooms, K., De Maeyer, P., Fack, V., Van Assche, E., & Witlox, F. (2012b). Investigating the effectiveness of an efficient label placement method using eye movement data. The Cartographic Journal, 49(3), 234–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opach, T., & Nossum, A. (2011, July). Evaluating the usability of cartographic animations with eye-movement analysis. Proceedings of 22nd International Cartographic Conference, Paris, France. Retrieved from https://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2011/Oral%20Presentations%20PDF/A3-Visualisation%20efficiency/CO-005.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pomplun, M., & Sunkara, S. (2003). Pupil dilation as an indicator of cognitive workload in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on HCI (pp. 542–546). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Popelka, S., & Brychtova, A. (2013). Eye-tracking study on different perception of 2D and 3D terrain visualisation. The Cartographic Journal, 50(3), 240–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., Mansfield, J., & Jin, Z. (2005). Feature congestion: A measure of display clutter. In CHI '05. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 761–770) New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., & Nakano, L. (2007). Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 7(2), Article 17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2013a). An empirically-derived taxonomy of interaction primitives for interactive cartography and geovisualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2356–2365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2013b). Interactive maps: What we know and what we need to know. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 6, 59–115.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E., Çöltekin, A., Delazari, L., Filho, H. F., Griffin, A., Hall, A., … van Elzakker, C.P.J.M. (2017). User studies in cartography: Opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3(S1), 61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Rylov, M. A., & Reimer, A. W. (2014). A comprehensive multi-criteria model for high cartographic quality point-feature label placement. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 49(1), 52–68.
   Google Scholar
• Schnur, S., Bektaş, K., & Çöltekin, A. (2017). Measured and perceived visual complexity: A comparative study among three online map providers. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 1–17. doi:10.1080/15230406.2017.1323676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smerecnik, C. M., Mesters, I., Kessels, L. T., Ruiter, R. A., De Vries, N. K., & De Vries, H. (2010). Understanding the positive effects of graphical risk information on comprehension: Measuring attention directed to written, tabular, and graphical risk information. Risk Analysis, 30(9), 1387–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigmar, H., & Harrie, L. (2011). Evaluation of analytical measures of map legibility. The Cartographic Journal, 48(1), 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, F., Morita, M., & Stark, L. W. (1985). Comparative patterns of reading eye movement in Chinese and English. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 37(6), 502–506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobii. (2016). Tobii studio user’s manual version 3.4.5. Retrieved 2016, from http://www.tobiipro.com/siteassets/tobii-pro/user-manuals/tobii-pro-studio-user-manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Touya, G., Hoarau, C., & Christophe, S. (2016). Clutter and map legibility in automated cartography: A research agenda. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 51(4), 198–207.
   Google Scholar
• Traun, C., & Mayrhofer, C. (2017). Complexity reduction in choropleth map animations by autocorrelation weighted generalization of time-series data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 1–17. doi:10.1080/15230406.2017.1308836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufte, E. R. (1991). Envisioning information. Optometry & Vision Science, 68(4), 322–324.
   Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & Von Der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Chen, Y., Yuan, Y., Ye, H., & Zheng, S. (2016). Visualizing the intellectual structure of eye movement research in cartography. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(10), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 259–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar