Fine-tuning the usability of a crowdsourced indoor navigation system

References

• Barberis, C., Andrea, B., Giovanni, M., & Paolo, M. (2014). Experiencing indoor navigation on mobile devices. IT Professional, 16(1), 50–57. doi:10.1109/MITP.2013.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhathoki, N. R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2012). Motivation for open collaboration: Crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 548–575. doi:10.1177/0002764212469364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, B. (2012). Advanced web metrics with Google Analytics. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cocco, L., Mannaro, K., Concas, G., & Marchesi, M. (2011). Simulating kanban and scrum vs. waterfall with system dynamics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Agile Software Development (pp. 117–131). Berlin: Springer.doi:10.1007/s00228-010-0929-8
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., Lindvall, M., & Costa, P. (2003). Agile software development DACS SOAR Report, 11. Retrieved from http://users.jyu.fi/~mieijala/kandimateriaali/Agile%20software%20development.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 329–340. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbish, L., Stuart, C., Tsay, J., & Herbsleb, J. (2012). Social coding in GitHub: Transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1277–1286). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Delafontaine, M., Versichele, M., Neutens, T., & Van de Weghe, N. (2012). Analysing spatiotemporal sequences in Bluetooth tracking data. Applied Geography, 34, 659–668. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delikostidis, I. (2011). Improving the usability of pedestrian navigation systems (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/librarywww/papers_2011/phd/delikostidis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Delikostidis, I., Van Elzakker, C. P., & Kraak, M. J. (2016). Overcoming challenges in developing more usable pedestrian navigation systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 43(3), 189–207. doi:10.1080/15230406.2015.1031180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9), 833–859. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earthy, J., Jones, B. S., & Bevan, N. (2001). The improvements of human-centred processes - facing the challenge and reaping the benefit of ISO 13407. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4), 553–585. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2001.0493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012). Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3), 571–590. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.595657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallah, N., Apostolopoulos, I., Bekris, K., & Folmer, E. (2013). Indoor human navigation systems: A survey. Interacting with Computers, 25(1), 21–33. doi:10.1093/iwc/iws010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, S., See, L., & Brovelli, M. (2017). Motivating and sustaining participation in VGI. In G. Foody, S. Fritz, C. C. Fonte, L. Bastin, A.-M. Olteanu-Raimond, P. Mooney, … R. Vatseva (Eds.), Mapping and the citizen sensor (pp. 398). London: Ubiquity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, G. (2004). Location-based mobile pedestrian navigation services – The role of multimedia cartography. Paper presented at Joint Workshop on Ubiquitous, Pervasive and Internet Mapping, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, M., & Zipf, A. (2013). Indoor route planning with volunteered geographic information on a (mobile) web-based platform. In M. J. Krisp (Ed.), Progress in location-based services (pp. 211–231). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. (1999). Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32. http://ijsdir.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php/ijsdir/article/view/28
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., & Nivala, A. M. (2010). User-centred design. In M. Haklay (Ed.), Interacting with geospatial technologies (pp. 89–106). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., & Ida, S. (2005). Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In A. Cohn & D. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory (Vol. 3693, pp. 475–490). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, C., Brösamle, M., & Vrachliotis, G. (2012). Challenges in multilevel wayfinding: a case study with the space syntax technique. Environment and planning B: planning and design. 39(1), 63–82. doi:10.1068/b34050t
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, C., Meilinger, T., Vrachliotis, G., Brösamle, M., & Knauff, M. (2006). Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., & Gartner, G. (2010). A survey of mobile indoor navigation systems. In G. Gartner & F. Ortag (Eds.), Cartography in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 305–319). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hund, A. M., & Padgitt, A. J. (2010). Direction giving and following in the service of wayfinding in a complex indoor environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 553–564. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isikdag, U., Zlatanova, S., & Underwood, J. (2013). A BIM-oriented model for supporting indoor navigation requirements. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 112–123. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO (1998). 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Geneva: International organization for standardization. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/16883.html
   Google Scholar
• John, B., & Packer, H. (1995). Learning and using the cognitive walkthrough method: A case study approach. In I.R. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M.B. Rosson & J. Nielsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI 95), (pp.429–436). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/223904.223962
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, H. A. (2011). Universal navigation on smartphones. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, H. A. (Ed.). (2015). Indoor wayfinding and navigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbe, T. H. (2003). Augmented videos and panoramas for pedestrian navigation. Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, 66, 45–52. doi:10.1.1.112.1759
   Google Scholar
• Krisp, J. K.(Ed.). (2013). Progress in location based services. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, C. A., & Kallai, J. (2002). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies and anxiety about wayfinding: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 47(9–10), 389–401. doi:10.1023/A:1021668724970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2004). A spatial access-oriented implementation of a 3-D GIS topological data model for urban entities. GeoInformatica, 8(3), 237–264. doi:10.1023/B:GEIN.0000034820.93914.d0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, B., Ohlbach, H. J., & Stoffel, E.-P. (2006). A hybrid spatial model for representing indoor environments. In J. D. Carswell & T. Tezuka (Eds.), Web and wireless geographical information systems (pp. 102–112). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/11935148_10
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 257–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ooms, K. (2016). Cartographic user research in the 21st century: Mixing and interacting. In: 6th international conference on cartography and GIS, Albena (Bulgaria).
   Google Scholar
• Ooms, K., De Maeyer, P., Fack, V., Van Assche, E., & Witlox, F. (2012). Interpreting maps through the eyes of expert and novice users. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(10), 1773–1788. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.642801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Geospatial Consortium. (2008). OpenGIS City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) encoding standard. Retrieved from http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/citygml
   Google Scholar
• Open Geospatial Consortium. (2014). OGC® IndoorGML, Retrieved from http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/indoorgml
   Google Scholar
• Ozdenizci, B., Coskun, V., & Ok, K. (2015). NFC internal: An indoor navigation system. Sensors, 15(4), 7571–7595. doi:10.3390/s150407571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgitt, A. J., & Hund, A. M. (2012). How good are these directions? Determining direction quality and wayfinding efficiency. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(2), 164–172. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza, B. (2011). Google analytics for measuring website performance. Tourism Management, 32(3), 477–481. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbacher, T. (2004). Mobile Cartography – Adaptive Visualisation of Geographic Information on Mobile Devices (unpublished dissertation). Technischen Universität München. Retrieved from https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/601066/601066.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. C., Chen, J., Lengerich, E. J., Meyer, H. G., & MacEachren, A. M. (2005). Combining usability techniques to design geovisualization tools for epidemiology. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32(4), 243–255. doi:10.1559/152304005775194700
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2011). Interacting with maps: The science and practice of cartographic interaction. (unpublished dissertation). Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved from https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/12433
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E., Çöltekin, A., Delazari, L., Filho, H. F., Griffin, A., Hall, A., … Van Elzakker, C. P. (2017). User studies in cartography: Opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 61–89. doi:10.1080/23729333.2017.1288534
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E., Ross, K. S., & MacEachren, A. M. (2015). User-centered design for interactive maps: A case study in crime analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(1), 262–301. doi:10.3390/ijgi4010262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing. how to plan, design and conduct effective tests (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Slingsby, A., & Raper, J. (2008). Navigable space in 3D city models for pedestrians. In P. Van Oosterom, S. Zlatanova, F. Penninga, & E. M. Fendel (Eds.), Advances in 3D geoinformation systems (pp. 49–64). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72135-2_3
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T. A., Sluter, R. S., Kessler, F. C., & Yoder, S. C. (2004). A qualitative evaluation of Maptime, a program for exploring spatiotemporal point data. Cartographica, 39(3), 43–68. doi:10.3138/92T3-T928-8105-88X7
   Google Scholar
• Stoffel, E.-P., Lorenz, B., & Ohlbach, H. J. (2007). Towards a semantic spatial model for pedestrian indoor navigation. In J.-L. Hainaut, E. A. Rundensteiner, M. Kirchberg, M. Bertolotto, M. Brochhausen, P. Chen, … E. Zimlanyi (Eds.), Advances in conceptual modeling – foundations and applications (Vol. 4802, pp. 328–337). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76292-8_39
   Google Scholar
• Stroeken, K., Verdoolaege, A., Versichele, M., De Backere, F., Devos, D., Verstichel, S., & Van de Weghe, N. (2015). Zone-it before IT zones you: A location-based digital notice board to build community while preserving privacy. Journal of Location Based Services, 9(1), 16–32. doi:10.1080/17489725.2015.1027750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J., Viktorov, A., Blount, J., & Puntikov, N. (2007). Distributed scrum: Agile project management with outsourced development teams. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. New York: IEEE. Retrieved from https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2007/2755/00/27550274a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tarampi, M. R., Heydari, N., & Hegarty, M. (2016). A tale of two types of perspective taking: Sex differences in spatial ability. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1507–1516. doi:10.1177/0956797616667459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay, J., Dabbish, L., & Herbsleb, J. (2014). Influence of social and technical factors for evaluating contribution in GitHub. Proceedings of the 36th international conference on Software engineering. (pp. 356–366). New York: ACM. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10038370 doi: 10.1177/1753193414564095
   Google Scholar
• Van Elzakker, C. P. J. M., & Wealands, K. (2007). Use and users of multimedia cartography. In W. Cartwright, M. Peterson, & G. Gartner (Eds.), Multimedia cartography (2nd ed., pp. 487–504). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-36651-5_34
   Google Scholar
• Vanclooster, A., Ooms, K., Viaene, P., Fack, V., Van de Weghe, N., & De Maeyer, P. (2014a). Evaluating suitability of the least risk path algorithm to support cognitive wayfinding in indoor spaces: An empirical study. Applied Geography, 53, 128–140. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclooster, A., Van de Weghe, N., Fack, V., & De Maeyer, P. (2014b). Comparing indoor and outdoor network models for automatically calculating turns. Journal of Location Based Services, 8(3), 148–165. doi:10.1080/17489725.2014.975289
   Google Scholar
• Versichele, M., De Groote, L., Claeys Boùùaert, M., Neutens, T., Moerman, I., & Van de Weghe, N. (2014). Pattern mining in tourist attraction visits through association rule learning on Bluetooth tracking data: A case study of Ghent, Belgium. Tourism Management, 44, 67–81. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viaene, P., Vansteenkiste, P., Lenoir, M., De Wulf, A., & De Maeyer, P. (2016). Examining the validity of the total dwell time of eye fixations to identify landmarks in a building. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(3), 1–11. doi:10.16910/jemr.9.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, L., & Worboys, M. (2010). Indoor spatial theory. Technical report presented at the ISA project meeting held at the 2010 International Workshop on Indoor Spatial Awareness, Taipei (Taiwan).
   Google Scholar
• Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C., & Polson, P. G. (1994). The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner’s guide. In J. Nielsen & R. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 105–140). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., Winstanley, A., Pan, Z., & Coveney, S. (2009). Spatial characteristics of walking areas for pedestrian navigation. In W. Jiang, H. Jin, R. Zheng & D. Jou (Eds.), Third International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, (pp. 452–458). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE,. doi:10.1109/MUE.2009.80
   Google Scholar