Point, polygon, or marker? In search of the best geographic entity for mapping cultural ecosystem services using the online public participation geographic information systems tool, “My Green Place”

References

• Atzmanstorfer, K., Resl, R., Eitzinger, A., & Izurieta, X. (2014). The GeoCitizen-approach: Community-based spatial planning - An Ecuadorian case study. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(3), 248–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2014.890546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertamini, M., Palumbo, L., Gheorghes, T. N., & Galatsidas, M. (2016). Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity? British Journal of Psychology, 107(1), 154–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2012). An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data. Applied Geography, 34, 289–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Donovan, S., Pullar, D., Pocewicz, A., Toohey, R., & Ballesteros-Lopez, R. (2014). An empirical evaluation of workshop versus survey PPGIS methods. Applied Geography, 48, 42–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Fagerholm, N. (2015). Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 13, 119–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Pullar, D. V. (2012). An evaluation of the use of points versus polygons in public participation geographic information systems using quasi-experimental design and Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.585139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Reed, P. (2000). Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science, 46(2), 240–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/46.2.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Reed, P. (2009). Public participation GIS: A new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Weber, D., & De Bie, K. (2015). Land use policy is PPGIS good enough? An empirical evaluation of the quality of PPGIS crowd-sourced spatial data for conservation planning. Land Use Policy, 43, 228–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Umwelt Naturschutz Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BMUB). (2015). Grün in der Stadt − Für eine lebenswerte Zukunft. BMUB. https://bit.ly/2NsZ8qA
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research, 33(2), 261–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L., & Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37(June2018), 100925. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, S. (2020). Neocartography and OpenStreetMap. In A. J. Kent & P. Vujakovic (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of mapping and cartography (1st ed., pp. 618). Routledge. https://bit.ly/3bN7sut
   Google Scholar
• Church, A., Fish, R., & Haines-Young, R. (2014). UK national ecosystem assessment follow-on. Work package Report 5: Cultural ecosystem services and indicators. UNEP-WCMC, LWEC, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J., & Cochrane, L. (2020). Geospatial Web, participatory. In International encyclopedia of human geography (Vol. 6, 2nd ed., pp. 131–136). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102295-5.10604-3
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, K. N., Silvia, P. J., Bertamini, M., Palumbo, L., & Vartanian, O. (2017). Curve appeal: Exploring individual differences in preference for curved versus angular objects. I-Perception, 8(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517693023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czepkiewicz, M., Jankowski, P., & Młodkowski, M. (2017). Geo-questionnaires in urban planning: Recruitment methods, participant engagement, and data quality. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44(6), 551–567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1230520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darejeh, A., & Singh, D. (2013). A review on user interface design principles to increase software usability for users with less computer literacy. Journal of Computer Science, 9(11), 1443–1450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.1443.1450
   Google Scholar
• DCDSTF. (1988). Definitions and references. The American Cartographer, 15(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1559/152304088783887134
   Google Scholar
• De Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F., & Longley, P. (2007). Quadrat sampling and analysis. In Geospatial analysis: A comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools ( illustrate, pp. 394.). Troubador Publishing Ltd. https://bit.ly/3eWsyJ5
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. J., & Waters, T. (2003). Tools for web-based GIS mapping of a “fuzzy” vernacular geography. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on GeoComputation. https://bit.ly/3rO3JT0
   Google Scholar
• Findlater, L., Froehlich, J. E., Fattal, K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Dastyar, T. (2013). Age - Related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input (pp. 343–346). Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470703
   Google Scholar
• Gliozzo, G. (2018). Leveraging the value of crowdsourced geographic information to detect cultural ecosystem services. (Issue January). University College London. https://bit.ly/3qSdcrl
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, L., & Mackaness, W. (2017). The bounds of distortion: Truth, meaning and efficacy in digital geographic representation. International Journal of Cartography, 3(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1301348
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D. N., Berry, P., Dunford, R., & Harrison, P. A. (2018). Concepts and methods in ecosystem services valuation. In M. Potschin, R. Haines-Young, R. Fish and R. K. Turner (Eds), Routledge handbook of ecosystem services (pp. 99–111). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775302-9
   Google Scholar
• Gottwald, S., Laatikainen, T. E., & Kyttä, M. (2016). Exploring the usability of PPGIS among older adults: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(12), 2321–2338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1170837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A., Amrhein, C. G., & Desloges, J. R. (1991). Statistical analysis for geographers (1st ed.). Prentice Hall. https://amzn.to/2OVGBDx
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2018, January). CICES V5. 1. Guidance on the application of the revised structure. Fabis consulting (pp. 53).
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., (Muki), Basiouka, S., Antoniou, V., & Ather, A. (2010). How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of Linus’ law to volunteered geographic information. The Cartographic Journal, 47(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/000870410X12911304958827
   Google Scholar
• Huck, J. J., Whyatt, J. D., & Coulton, P. (2014). Spraycan: A PPGIS for capturing imprecise notions of place. Applied Geography, 55, 229–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, I., Khan, I. A., Khan, I. A., & Hussain, S. S. (2017). A survey on usage of touchscreen versus mouse for interaction. Journal: The Science International (Lahore) 29(1), 83–88.  http://www.sci-int.com/pdf/636433916377569179.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ICT Update. (2005, September). Participatory GIS. CTA Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (ACP-EU) (pp. 1–8). https://bit.ly/3qSeVNg
   Google Scholar
• INSEE - National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies. (2018). Handbook of spatial analysis: Theory and practical application with R. (Issue October). European Statistical Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Jaligot, R., Kemajou, A., & Chenal, J. (2018). Cultural ecosystem services provision in response to urbanization in Cameroon. Land Use Policy, 79(March), 641–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.013
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. R., & Jensen, R. R. (2013). Introductory geographic information systems (Illustrate). Pearson. https://bit.ly/3eIxb9f
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, E., García-Llorente, M., Pataki, G., Martín-López, B., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2016). Non-monetary techniques for the valuation of ecosystem services. In M. Potschin-Young (Ed), OpenNESS ecosystem services reference book (pp. 1–5). ECNC-European Centre for Nature Conservation. http://www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book/sp-ecosystem-service-trade-offs-and-synergies
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Wong, D. W. S. (2001). Pattern detectors. In Wiley (Ed.), Statistical analysis with ArcView GIS (pp. 208). Wiley. https://bit.ly/3liWDDJ
   Google Scholar
• Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. Plenum Trade. https://www.worldcat.org/title/collective-intelligence-mankinds-emerging-world-in-cyberspace/oclc/37195391
   Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for “good” governance? Geoforum, 43(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, M. K., Martinez, J., & Verplanke, J. (2015). Shifting boundaries of volunteered geographic information systems and modalities: Learning from PGIS. Acme, 14(3), 791–826. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1234
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, C. J., Jr., & Monroe, C. B. (2009). An introduction to statistical problem solving in geography: Second edition (2nd ed.). Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milcu, A. I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., & Fischer, J. (2013). Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and Prospects For Future Research. Ecology and Society, 18(3), art44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05790-180344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. (2005). Identifying patterns. In The ESRI guide to GIS analysis, Volume 2: Spatial measurements and statistics (pp. 252). https://esripress.esri.com/display/index.cfm?fuseaction=display&websiteID=86&moduleID=1
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Nielsen Norman Group. https://bit.ly/3rObGHQ
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). Design patterns and business models for the Next Generation of Software. https://bit.ly/3bR7u4H
   Google Scholar
• Pánek, J. (2016). From mental maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal, 53(4), 300–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, P. (1995). Land-based communities, geomatics and biodiversity conservation. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 18(4), 1–4. https://bit.ly/3eRhywa
   Google Scholar
• Rambaldi, G. (2010). Participatory Three-dimensional modelling: Guiding principles and applications. In ACP-EU technical centre for agricultural and rural cooperation (CTA) (2010th ed., Issue January 2010, pp. 26–46). ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA). https://bit.ly/38NdkCe
   Google Scholar
• Roman, S. (2017). Millennials are tech savvy. Gen Z’s are tech native. Top Employers Institute. https://www.top-employers.com/en/insights-old/millennials-are-tech-savvy-gen-zs-are-tech-native-shaara-roman/
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, P. (1996). Criteria for the Design of a GIS2. In National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00694-5
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielman, S. E. (2014). Spatial collective intelligence? Credibility, accuracy, and volunteered geographic information. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.874200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2020). Market share of mobile phone touch screens worldwide from 2013 to 2020. Statista Inc. https://bit.ly/3cyXTP3
   Google Scholar
• The Belgian statistical office (STATBEL). (2021). Population by place of residence, nationality. STATBEL. https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?view=3ebe4ddc-27e6-4d3d-a6c0-3121df828953
   Google Scholar