Virtual reality for geospatial education: immersive technologies enhance sense of embodiment

References

• Abrahamson, D., & Lindgren, R. (2014). Embodiment and embodied design. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 358–376). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alibali, M. W., Boncoddo, R., & Hostetter, A. B. (2014). Gesture in reasoning: An embodied perspective. In Lawrence Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 168–177). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baceviciute, S., Terkildsen, T., & Makransky, G. (2021). Remediating learning from non-immersive to immersive media: Using eeg to investigate the effects of environmental embeddedness on reading in virtual reality. Computers & Education, 164, 104122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagher, M. M., Sajjadi, P., Carr, J., La Femina, P., & Klippel, A. (2020). Fostering penetrative thinking in geosciences through immersive experiences: A case study in visualizing earthquake locations in 3D. In 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN), (pp. 132–139).
   Google Scholar
• Bagher, M., Sajjadi, P., Wallgrün, J., La Femina, P., & Klippel, A. (2021). Move the object or move the user: The role of interaction techniques on embodied learning in vr. front. In Virtual real (Vol. 2, pp. 695312). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biocca, F. (1999). The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Human Factors in Information Technology, 3(2), 113–144.
   Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., & Bailenson, J. (2011). Infinite reality: Avatars, eternal life, new worlds, and the dawn of the virtual revolution. William Morrow & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. A., & McMahan, R. P. (2007). Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer, 40(7), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, C., & Woo, A. (2015). 3D data visualization: The advantages of volume graphics and big data to support geologic interpretation. Interpretation, 3(3), SX29–39. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2014-0257.1
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, P. G., Chang, J.S.-K, Yeboah, G., Doucette, A., Chandrasekharan, S., Nitsche, M., Mazalek, A., Welsh, T., & Mazalek, A. (2016). Design of embodied interfaces for engaging spatial cognition. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0032-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coffin, M. F., Gahagan, L. M., & Lawver, L. A. (1997). Present-day plate boundary digital data compilation (Tech. Rep). Institute for Geophysics.
   Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., Lochhead, I., Madden, M., Christophe, S., Devaux, A., Pettit, C., Lock, O., Shukla, S., Herman, L., Stachoň, Z., Kubíček, P., Snopková, D., Bernardes, S., & Hedley, N. (2020). Extended reality in spatial sciences: A review of research challenges and future directions. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-d virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, M., & Senior, K. (2011). Appearing pedagogy: From embodied learning and teaching to embodied pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(3), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.632514
   Google Scholar
• Dübel, S., Röhlig, M., Schumann, H., & Trapp, M. (2014). 2D and 3D presentation of spatial data: A systematic review. In 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on R3DVis (3DVis), Paris, France, (pp. 11–18).
   Google Scholar
• Fribourg, R., Argelaguet, F., Lécuyer, A., & Hoyet, L. (2020). Avatar and sense of embodiment: Studying the relative preference between appearance, control and point of view. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(5), 2062–2072. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.2973077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaemi, Z., Engelke, U., Ens, B., & Jenny, B. (2022). Proxemic maps for immersive visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 49(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.2013946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannopoulos, I., Komninos, A., & Garofalakis, J. (2017). Natural interaction with large map interfaces in vr. In Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Larissa, Greece, (pp. 1–6).
   Google Scholar
• Global Volcanism Program, 2013. Volcanoes of the World, v. 4.11.2 (02 Sep). Venzke, E. (Ed.), Smithsonian Institution. Downloaded 02 Sep https://doi.org/10.5479/si.GVP.VOTW4-2013
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Franco, M., & Peck, T. C. (2018). Avatar embodiment. Towards a standardized questionnaire. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramann, K. (2013). Embodiment of spatial reference frames and individual differences in reference frame proclivity. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 13(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2011.589038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannula, K. A. (2019). Do geology field courses improve penetrative thinking? Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1548004
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannou, M., Ioannou, A., Georgiou, Y., & Retalis, S. (2020). Designing an orchestrating the classroom experience for technology-enhanced embodied learning. In M. Gresalfi & I. Horn (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 2, pp. 1079–1086). Nashville, Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, A. J., Wiley, J., & Moher, T. (2016). Leveling the playing field: Grounding learning with embedded simulations in geoscience. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0011-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerald, J. (2016). The VR book: Human-centered design for virtual reality. Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2018). Immersive VR and education: Embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Bartolomea, H., & Kalina, E. (2021). Platform is not destiny: Embodied learning effects comparing 2D desktop to 3D virtual reality stem experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1263–1284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D. A., Tolentino, L., & Koziupa, T. (2014). Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: Two science studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D. A., & Savio- Ramos, C. (2016). Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1819. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. W., & McNamara, T. P. (2010). Reference frames during the acquisition and development of spatial memories. Cognition, 116(3), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilteni, K., Groten, R., & Slater, M. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmas, P., Ioannou, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2019). Implementing embodied learning in the classroom: Effects on children’s memory and language skills. Educational Media International, 56(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1547948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. A. -L., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In Paul Bloom, Merrill F. Garrett, Lynn Nadel and Mary A. Peterson, (Eds.), Language and Space, 109, 169. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libarkin, J. C., & Brick, C. (2002). Research methodologies in science education: Visualization and the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-50.4.449
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-R., Loffin, R., & Stark, T. (1998). Virtual reality for geosciences visualization. In Proceedings 3rd Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction (Cat. No. 98EX110), Kangawa, Japan, (pp. 196–201).
   Google Scholar
• Makransky, G., Andreasen, N. K., Baceviciute, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Immersive virtual reality increases liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 719. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<33:AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilinger, T., Frankenstein, J., Simon, N., Bülthoff, H. H., & Bresciani, J.-P. (2016). Not all memories are the same: Situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0883-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilinger, T., Riecke, B. E., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2014). Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 542–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.821145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, A. U. Frank, & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory a theoretical basis for GIS (Vol. 716, pp. 312–321). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Newbury, R., Satriadi, K. A., Bolton, J., Liu, J., Cordeil, M., Prouzeau, A., & Jenny, B. (2021). Embodied gesture interaction for immersive maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2015). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In John S. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity (pp. 179–192). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ormand, C. J., Manduca, C., Shipley, T. F., Tikoff, B., Harwood, C. L., Atit, K., & Boone, A. P. (2014). Evaluating geoscience students’ spatial thinking skills in a multi-institutional classroom study. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(1), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-027.1
   Google Scholar
• Ratan, R., & Sah, Y. J. (2015). Leveling up on stereotype threat: The role of avatar customization and avatar embodiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riener, C., & Stefanucci, J. (2014). Perception and/for/with/as action. In Lawrence Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition, (pp. 99–107). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzwoller, M. H., Barmin, M. P., Villasenor, A., Levshin, A. L., & Engdahl, E. R. (2002). Pn and sn tomography across Eurasia to improve regional seismic event locations. Tectonophysics, 358(1–4), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00416-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Torres, A., Zarraonandia, T., Díaz, P., & Aedo, I. (2018). Exploring interaction mechanisms for map interfaces in virtual reality environments. In Proceedings of the XIX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Palma, Spain, (pp. 1–7).
   Google Scholar
• Scoble, R., & Israel, S. (2017). The fourth transformation: How augmented reality and artificial intelligence change everything. Patrick Brewster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. (2007). The embodied cognition research programme. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00064.x
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. (2014). The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shusterman, A., & Li, P. (2016). Frames of reference in spatial language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 115–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: Introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of B, 364(1535), 3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., Spanlang, B., & Corominas, D. (2010). Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 29(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1778765.1778829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyrnaiou, Z., Sotiriou, M., Georgakopoulou, E., & Papadopoulou, O. (2016). Connecting embodied learning in educational practice to the realisation of science educational scenarios through performing arts. In Angelos Lazoudis, Stephanos Cherouvis (Ed.), INSPIRING SCIENCE EDUCATION conference, Pallini, Greece, 31, 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa Santos, B., Dias, P., Pimentel, A., Baggerman, J.-W., Ferreira, C., Silva, S., & Madeira, J. (2009). Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: A user study. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 41(1), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-008-0223-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southgate, E. (2020). Conceptualising embodiment through virtual reality for education. In 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (IlRN) (pp. 38–45).
   Google Scholar
• Spur, M., Tourre, V., David, E., Moreau, G., & Le Callet, P. (2020). Mapstack: Exploring multilayered geospatial data in virtual reality. In 11th International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications (pp. 88–99).
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P., Rimzhim, A., Vijay, P., Singh, S., & Chandra, S. (2019). Desktop VR is better than non-ambulatory HMD VR for spatial learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 6, 50. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolz, S. A. (2015). Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.879694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmond, J. B., Drzewiecki, P. A., & Xu, X. (2005). Building simple multiscale visualizations of outcrop geology using virtual reality modeling language (vrml). Computers & Geosciences, 31(7), 913–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinker, S. W. (1996). Building the 3-D jigsaw puzzle: Applications of sequence stratigraphy to 3-D reservoir characterization, permian basin. AAPG Bulletin, 80(4), 460–484. https://doi.org/10.1306/64ED8818-1724-11D7-8645000102C1865D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., & J¨ancke, L. (2004). Mec spatial presence questionnaire. Retrieved September 18, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Weise, M., Zender, R., & Lucke, U. (2019). A comprehensive classification of 3D selection and manipulation techniques. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019 (pp. 321–332).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W., Hartmann, T., Böcking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, H., Saari, T., Laarni, J., Ravaja, N., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Sacau, A., Jäncke, L., Baumgartner, T., & Jäncke, P. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media Psychology, 9(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701283079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Dwyer, T., Marriott, K., Jenny, B., & Goodwin, S. (2020). Tilt map: Interactive transitions between choropleth map, prism map and bar chart in immersive environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
   Google Scholar
• Yeonhee Cho. (2018). How spatial presence in VR affects memory retention and motivation on second language learning: A comparison of desktop and immersive vr-based learning [ Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University]. https://surface.syr.edu/thesis/204
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., Kong, F., Luo, Y., Zeng, S., Lan, J., & You, X. (2019). Gender differences in large-scale and small-scale spatial ability: A systematic review based on behavioral and neuroimaging research. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M.-J., Zhang, K., Li, J., & Li, Y.-N. (2018). Visual exploration of 3D geospatial networks in a virtual reality environment. The Computer Journal, 61(3), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxx117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Sensibaugh, T., Bodenheimer, B., McNamara, T. P., Nazareth, A., New- Combe, N., Minear, M., & Klippel, A. (2020). Desktop versus immersive virtual environments: Effects on spatial learning. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 20(4), 328–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2020.1817925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Simpson, M., Sajjadi, P., Wallgrün, J. O., Li, P., Bagher, M. M., Klippel, A. , Klippel, A. (2021). Crowdxr-pitfalls and potentials of experiments with remote participants. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Bari, Italy, (pp. 450–459).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Wallgrün, J. O., LaFemina, P. C., Normandeau, J., & Klippel, A. (2019). Harnessing the power of immersive virtual reality-visualization and analysis of 3D earth science data sets. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 22(4), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2019.1621544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielasko, D., & Riecke, B. E. (2021). To sit or not to sit in vr: Analyzing influences and (dis) advantages of posture and embodied interaction. Computers, 10(6), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10060073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar