Lowland tundra plant stoichiometry is somewhat resilient decades following fire despite substantial and sustained shifts in community structure

References

• Abbott, B. W., A. V. Rocha, A. Shogren, J. P. Zarnetske, F. Iannucci, W. B. Bowden, S. P. Bratsman, L. Patch, R. Watts, R. Fulweber, et al. 2021. Tundra wildfire triggers sustained lateral nutrient loss in Alaskan Arctic. Global Change Biology 27 (7):1408–30. doi:10.1111/gcb.15507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaska Interagency Coordination Center. n.d. Predictive services – maps/imagery/geospatial. https://fire.ak.blm.gov/predsvcs/maps.php
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, K., A. V. Rocha, M. J. van de Weg, and G. Shaver. 2012. Vegetation shifts observed in Arctic tundra 17 years after fire. Remote Sensing Letters 3 (8):729–36. doi:10.1080/2150704X.2012.676741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bret-Harte, M. S., M. C. Mack, G. R. Shaver, D. C. Huebner, M. Johnston, C. A. Mojica, C. Pizano, and J. A. Reiskind. 2013. The response of Arctic vegetation and soils following an unusually severe tundra fire. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368 (1624):20120490–20120490. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, O. M., J. Elser, T. Lewis, B. Mackey, and C. Chen. 2018. The phosphorus-rich signature of fire in the soil-plant system: A global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 21 (3):335–44. doi:10.1111/ele.12896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, O. M., T. Lewis, M. Rezaei Rashti, S. C. Maunsell, J. J. Elser, and C. Chen. 2019. The stoichiometric legacy of fire regime regulates the roles of micro-organisms and invertebrates in decomposition. Ecology 100 (7):e02732. doi:10.1002/ecy.2732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, F. S., S. F. Trainor, O. Huntington, A. L. Lovecraft, E. Zavaleta, D. C. Natcher, A. D. McGuire, J. L. Nelson, L. Ray, M. Calef, et al. 2008. Increasing wildfire in Alaska’s boreal forest: Pathways to potential solutions of a wicked problem. BioScience 58 (6):531–40. doi:10.1641/B580609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Baets, S., M. J. van de Weg, R. Lewis, N. Steinberg, J. Meersmans, T. A. Quine, G. R. Shaver, and I. P. Hartley. 2016. Investigating the controls on soil organic matter decomposition in tussock tundra soil and permafrost after fire. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 99:108–16. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, F. A., and M. A. Adams. 2015. Fire eases imbalances of nitrogen and phosphorus in woody plants. Ecosystems 18 (5):769–79. doi:10.1007/s10021-015-9861-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farukh, M. A., and H. Hayasaka. 2012. Active forest fire occurrences in severe lightning years in Alaska. Journal of Natural Disaster Science 33 (2):71–84. doi:10.2328/jnds.33.71.
   Google Scholar
• Flexas, J., and M. Carriquí. 2020. Photosynthesis and photosynthetic efficiencies along the terrestrial plant’s phylogeny: Lessons for improving crop photosynthesis. The Plant Journal 101 (4):964–78. doi:10.1111/tpj.14651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, N. H. F., L. K. Jenkins, T. V. Loboda, M. Flannigan, R. Jandt, L. L. Bourgeau-Chavez, and M. Whitley. 2015. Fire in Arctic tundra of Alaska: Past fire activity, future fire potential, and significance for land management and ecology. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24 (8):1045. doi:10.1071/WF14167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, G. V., R. A. Loehman, L. B. Saperstein, M. J. Macander, P. R. Nelson, D. P. Paradis, and S. M. Natali. 2020. Multi-decadal patterns of vegetation succession after tundra fire on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska. Environmental Research Letters 15 (2):025003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab5f49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaglioti, B. V., L. T. Berner, B. M. Jones, K. M. Orndahl, A. P. Williams, L. Andreu‐Hayles, R. D. D’Arrigo, S. J. Goetz, and D. H. Mann. 2021. Tussocks enduring or shrubs greening: alternate responses to changing fire regimes in the Noatak River Valley, Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 126 (4):e2020JG006009. doi:10.1029/2020JG006009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, R. J., A. Bucharova, L. Brodt, J. Kamp, D. Rieker, A. V. Soromotin, A. Yurtaev, and N. Hölzel. 2021. Post-fire vegetation succession in the Siberian subarctic tundra over 45 years. The Science of the Total Environment 760:143425. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, R. J., A. Yurtaev, A. Bucharova, W. Heim, V. Kutskir, K.-H. Knorr, C. Lampei, A. Pechkin, D. Schilling, F. Sulkarnaev, et al. 2021. Fire in lichen-rich subarctic tundra changes carbon and nitrogen cycling between ecosystem compartments but has minor effects on stocks. Biogeosciences Discussions 1–18. doi:10.5194/bg-2021-277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, R. E., D. L. Taylor, H. Genet, A. D. McGuire, and M. C. Mack. 2019. Below-ground plant traits influence tundra plant acquisition of newly thawed permafrost nitrogen. Journal of Ecology 107 (2):950–62. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuera, P. E., L. B. Brubaker, P. M. Anderson, T. A. Brown, A. T. Kennedy, and F. S. Hu. 2008. Frequent fires in ancient shrub tundra: Implications of paleorecords for arctic environmental change. Plos One 3 (3):e0001744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4 (1):1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, F. S., P. E. Higuera, P. Duffy, M. L. Chipman, A. V. Rocha, A. M. Young, R. Kelly, and M. C. Dietze. 2015. Arctic tundra fires: Natural variability and responses to climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13 (7):369–77. doi:10.1890/150063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, J., S. Natali, N. Baillargeon, S. Sistla, G. Pold et al, 2022. Polaris Project 2018: Vegetation biomass, plot characterization, point intercept, and thaw depth, Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska. Arctic Data Center. doi:10.18739/A2D795C0Q.
   Google Scholar
• Isles, P. D. F. 2020. The misuse of ratios in ecological stoichiometry. Ecology 101 (11):e03153. doi:10.1002/ecy.3153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., E. B. Rastetter, A. V. Rocha, A. R. Pearce, B. L. Kwiatkowski, and G. R. Shaver. 2015. Modeling carbon–nutrient interactions during the early recovery of tundra after fire. Ecological Applications 25 (6):1640–52. doi:10.1890/14-1921.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., E. B. Rastetter, G. R. Shaver, A. V. Rocha, Q. Zhuang, and B. L. Kwiatkowski. 2017. Modeling long-term changes in tundra carbon balance following wildfire, climate change, and potential nutrient addition. Ecological Applications 27 (1):105–17. doi:10.1002/eap.1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joly, K., P. A. Duffy, and T. S. Rupp. 2012. Simulating the effects of climate change on fire regimes in Arctic biomes: Implications for caribou and moose habitat. Ecosphere 3 (5):art36. doi:10.1890/ES12-00012.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. M., A. L. Breen, B. V. Gaglioti, D. H. Mann, A. V. Rocha, G. Grosse, C. D. Arp, M. L. Kunz, and D. A. Walker. 2013. Identification of unrecognized tundra fire events on the north slope of Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 118 (3):1334–44. doi:10.1002/jgrg.20113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klupar, I., A. V. Rocha, and E. B. Rastetter. 2021. Alleviation of nutrient co-limitation induces regime shifts in post-fire community composition and productivity in Arctic tundra. Global Change Biology 27 (14):3324–35. doi:10.1111/gcb.15646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. 2021. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.6.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
   Google Scholar
• Mack, M. C., M. S. Bret-Harte, T. N. Hollingsworth, R. R. Jandt, E. A. G. Schuur, G. R. Shaver, and D. L. Verbyla. 2011. Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire. Nature 475 (7357):489–92. doi:10.1038/nature10283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, M. C., E. A. G. Schuur, M. S. Bret-Harte, G. R. Shaver, and F. S. Chapin. 2004. Ecosystem carbon storage in Arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431 (7007):440–43. doi:10.1038/nature02887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narita, K., K. Harada, K. Saito, Y. Sawada, M. Fukuda, and S. Tsuyuzaki. 2015. Vegetation and permafrost thaw depth 10 years after a tundra fire in 2002, Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 47 (3):547–59. doi:10.1657/AAAR0013-031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partain, J. L., S. Alden, H. Strader, U. S. Bhatt, P. A. Bieniek, B. R. Brettschneider, J. E. Walsh, R. T. Lader, P. Q. Olsson, T. S. Rupp, et al. 2016. An assessment of the role of anthropogenic climate change in the Alaska fire season of 2015. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 97 (12):S14–S18. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0149.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, A. F. A., A. Ahlström, S. E. Hobbie, P. B. Reich, L. P. Nieradzik, A. C. Staver, B. C. Scharenbroch, A. Jumpponen, W. R. L. Anderegg, J. T. Randerson, et al. 2018. Fire frequency drives decadal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity. Nature 553 (7687):194–98. doi:10.1038/nature24668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, and D. Sarkar, R Core Team. 2021. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3. 1–153. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
   Google Scholar
• Pold, G., B. L. Kwiatkowski, E. B. Rastetter, and S. A. Sistla. 2022. Sporadic P limitation constrains microbial growth and facilitates SOM accumulation in the stoichiometrically coupled, acclimating microbe–plant–soil model. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 165:108489. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racine, C., R. Jandt, C. Meyers, and J. Dennis. 2004. Tundra fire and vegetation change along a hillslope on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, U.S.A. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 36 (1):1–10. doi:10.1657/1523-0430(2004)036[0001:TFAVCA]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Sae-Lim, J., J. M. Russell, R. S. Vachula, R. M. Holmes, P. J. Mann, J. D. Schade, and S. M. Natali. 2019. Temperature-controlled tundra fire severity and frequency during the last millennium in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska. The Holocene 29 (7):1223–33. doi:10.1177/0959683619838036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, V. G., P. Soucy, M. Mauritz, G. Celis, S. M. Natali, M. C. Mack, and E. A. G. Schuur. 2016. Nitrogen availability increases in a tundra ecosystem during five years of experimental permafrost thaw. Global Change Biology 22 (5):1927–41. doi:10.1111/gcb.13204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sistla, S. A., A. P. Appling, A. M. Lewandowska, B. N. Taylor, and A. A. Wolf. 2015. Stoichiometric flexibility in response to fertilization along gradients of environmental and organismal nutrient richness. Oikos 124 (7):949–59. doi:10.1111/oik.02385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sistla, S. A., and J. P. Schimel. 2012. Stoichiometric flexibility as a regulator of carbon and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems under change. New Phytologist 196 (1):68–78. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04234.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talucci, A. C., M. M. Loranty, and H. D. Alexander. 2022. Siberian taiga and tundra fire regimes from 2001–2020. Environmental Research Letters 17 (2):025001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac3f07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. C., W. Maslowski, J. Perlwitz, D. J. Wuebbles, D. J. Wuebbles, D. W. Fahey, K. A. Hibbard, D. J. Dokken, B. C. Stewart, and T. K. Maycock. 2017. Ch. 11: Arctic changes and their effects on Alaska and the rest of the United States. Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I. U.S. Global Change Research Program. doi:10.7930/J00863GK.
   Google Scholar
• Toberman, H., C. Chen, T. Lewis, and J. J. Elser. 2014. High-frequency fire alters C: N : P stoichiometry in forest litter. Global Change Biology 20 (7):2321–31. doi:10.1111/gcb.12432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuyuzaki, S., G. Iwahana, and K. Saito. 2018. Tundra fire alters vegetation patterns more than the resultant thermokarst. Polar Biology 41 (4):753–61. doi:10.1007/s00300-017-2236-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Elzen, E., F. Bengtsson, C. Fritz, H. Rydin, and L. P. M. Lamers. 2020. Variation in symbiotic N2 fixation rates among Sphagnum mosses. PLoS One 15 (2):e0228383. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. M., P. E. Higuera, P. A. Duffy, and F. S. Hu. 2017. Climatic thresholds shape northern high-latitude fire regimes and imply vulnerability to future climate change. Ecography 40 (5):606–17. doi:10.1111/ecog.02205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamin, T. J., M. S. Bret-Harte, and P. Grogan. 2014. Evergreen shrubs dominate responses to experimental summer warming and fertilization in Canadian mesic low Arctic tundra. Journal of Ecology 102 (3):749–66. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar