Assessment of Arctic sea ice and surface climate conditions in nine CMIP6 climate models

References

• Aksenov, Y., E. E. Popova, A. Yool, A. J. G. Nurser, T. D. Williams, L. Bertino, and J. Bergh. 2017. On the future navigability of Arctic sea routes: High-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice. Marine Policy 75: 300–17. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart, K. R., I. Overeem, and R. S. Anderson. 2014. The effect of changing sea ice on the physical vulnerability of Arctic coasts. Cryosphere 8, no. 5: 1777–99. doi:10.5194/tc-8-1777-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieniek, P. A., L. Erikson, and J. Kasper. 2022. Atmospheric circulation drivers of extreme high water level events at Foggy Island Bay, Alaska. Atmosphere 13, no. 11: 1791. doi:10.3390/atmos13111791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunzel, F., D. Notz, and L. T. Pedersen. 2018. Retrievals of Arctic sea-ice volume and its trend significantly affected by interannual snow variability. Geophysical Research Letters 45. 11,751– 11,759. doi:10.1029/2018GL078867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas-Prat, M., and X. L. Wang. 2020. Sea ice retreat contributes to projected increases in extreme Arctic Ocean surface waves. Geophysical Research Letters 47, no. 15. doi:10.1029/2020GL088100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas-Prat, M., X. L. Wang, and N. Swart. 2018. CMIP5-based global wave climate projections including the entire Arctic Ocean. Ocean Modelling 123, no. January: 66–85. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., S. Kang, C. Chen, Q. You, W. Du, M. Xu, X. Zhong, W. Zhang, and C. Jizu. 2020. Changes in sea ice and future accessibility along the Arctic Northeast Passage. Global and Planetary Change 195: 103319. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., R. Wu, Q. Shu, C. Min, Q. Yang, and B. Han. 2023. The Arctic sea ice thickness change in CMIP6ʹs historical simulations. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 40: 2331–43. doi:10.1007/s00376-022-1460-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevallier, M., G. C. Smith, F. Dupont, J.-F. Lemieux, G. Forget, Y. Fujii, F. Hernandez, R. Msadek, K. A. Peterson, and A. Storto. 2017. Intercomparison of the Arctic sea ice cover in global ocean-sea ice reanalyses from the ORA-IP project. Climate Dynamics 49, no. 3: 1107–36. doi:10.1007/s00382-016-2985-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, R., and S. Outten. 2020. The Arctic surface climate in CMIP6: Status and developments since CMIP5. Journal of Climate 33, no. 18: 8047–68. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0990.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demchev, D. M., M. Y. Kulakov, A. P. Makshtas, I. A. Makhotina, K. V. Fil’chuk, and I. E. Frolov. 2020. Verification of ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalyses data on surface air temperature in the Arctic. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology 45, no. 11: 771–7. doi:10.3103/S1068373920110035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRepentigny, P., A. Jahn, M. M. Holland, and A. Smith. 2020a. Arctic sea ice in two configurations of the CESM2 during the 20th and 21st centuries. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 125, no. 9: e2020JC016133. doi:10.1029/2020JC016133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRepentigny, P., A. Jahn, L. B. Tremblay, R. Newton, and S. Pfirman. 2020b. Increased transnational sea ice transport between neighboring Arctic states in the 21st century. Earth’s Future 8, no. 3: e2019EF001284. doi:10.1029/2019EF001284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docquier, D., J. P. Grist, M. J. Roberts, C. D. Roberts, T. Semmler, L. Ponsoni, F. Massonnet, et al. 2019. Impact of model resolution on Arctic sea ice and North Atlantic Ocean heat transport. Climate Dynamics 53, no. 7–8: 4989–5017. doi:10.1007/s00382-019-04840-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docquier, D., and T. Koenigk. 2021. Observation-based selection of climate models projects Arctic ice-free summers around 2035. Communications Earth and Environment 2, no. 1: 1–8. doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00214-7.
   Google Scholar
• Doscher, R., T. Vihma, and E. Maksimovich. 2014. Recent advances in understanding the Arctic climate system state and change from a sea ice perspective: A review. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14, no. 24: 13571–600. doi:10.5194/acp-14-13571-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, L. H., A. E. Gibbs, B. M. Richmond, C. D. Storlazzi, B. M. Jones, and K. Ohman. 2020. Changing storm conditions in response to projected 21st century climate change and the potential impact on an Arctic barrier island–lagoon system—A pilot study for Arey Island and Lagoon, eastern Arctic Alaska. US Geological Survey. doi:10.3133/ofr20201142.
   Google Scholar
• Førland, E. J., T. E. Skaugen, R. E. Benestad, I. Hanssen-Bauer, and O. E. Tveito. 2004. Variations in thermal growing, heating, and freezing indices in the Nordic Arctic, 1900–2050. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 36: 347–56. doi:10.1657/1523-0430(2004)036[0347:VITGHA]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankcombe, L. M., M. H. England, J. B. Kajtar, M. E. Mann, and B. A. Steinman. 2018. On the choice of ensemble mean for estimating the forced signal in the presence of internal variability. Journal of Climate 31, no. 14: 5681–93. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0662.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goosse, H., J. E. Kay, K. C. Armour, A. Bodas-Salcedo, H. Chepfer, D. Docquier, A. Jonko, et al. 2018. Quantifying climate feedbacks in polar regions. Nature Communications 9, no. 1. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04173-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham, R. M., L. Cohen, N. Ritzhaupt, B. Segger, R. G. Graversen, A. Rinke, V. P. Walden, M. A. Granskog, and S. R. Hudson. 2019. Evaluation of six atmospheric reanalyses over Arctic sea ice from winter to early summer. Journal of Climate 32, no. 14: 4121–43. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0643.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haine, T. W. N., B. Curry, R. Gerdes, E. Hansen, M. Karcher, C. Lee, B. Rudels, et al. 2015. Arctic freshwater export: Status, mechanisms, and prospects. Global and Planetary Change 125: 13–35. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S. G., L. Castro de la Guardia, A. E. Derocher, V. Sahanatien, B. Tremblay, and Huard, D. 2014. Projected polar bear sea ice habitat in the Canadian Arctic archipelago. PLOS ONE 9, no. 11: e113746. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsem, Ø., K. Heen, J. M. P. Rodrigues, and T. Vassdal. 2015. Oil exploration and sea ice projections in the Arctic. Polar Record 51, no. 1: 91–106. doi:10.1017/S0032247413000624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, J., and G. Svensson. 2013. Consequences of poor representation of Arctic sea-ice albedo and cloud-radiation interactions in the CMIP5 model ensemble. Geophysical Research Letters 40, no. 16: 4374–9. doi:10.1002/grl.50768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutti, R., J. Sedláček, B. M. Sanderson, R. Lorenz, E. M. Fischer, and V. Eyring. 2017. A climate model projection weighting scheme accounting for performance and interdependence. Geophysical Research Letters 44, no. 4: 1909–18. doi:10.1002/2016GL072012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, R. 2018. Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage: Losses and coupled variability (1958–2018). Environmental Research Letters 13(10): 105005. Institute of Physics Publishing. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae3ec.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, R., and G. F. Cunningham. 2015. Variability of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume from CryoSat-2. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 373, no. 2045. doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, R., G. Spreen, and S. Pang. 2013. Arctic sea ice circulation and drift speed: Decadal trends and ocean currents. Journal of Geophysical Research. Oceans 118, no. 5: 2408–25. doi:10.1002/jgrc.20191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxon, S. W., K. A. Giles, A. L. Ridout, D. J. Wingham, R. Willatt, R. Cullen, R. Kwok, et al. 2013. CryoSat-2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume. Geophysical Research Letters 40, no. 4: 732–7. doi:10.1002/grl.50193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R., M. Wensnahan, A. Schweiger, and J. Zhang. 2014. Evaluation of seven different atmospheric reanalysis products in the Arctic. Journal of Climate 27, no. 7: 2588–606. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00014.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M., L. Zhang, S. Hu, and S. Qian. 2021. Multi-aspect assessment of CMIP6 models for Arctic sea ice simulation. Journal of Climate 34, no. 4: 1515–29. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0522.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslanik, J. A., C. Fowler, J. Stroeve, S. Drobot, J. Zwally, D. Yi, and W. Emery. 2007. A younger, thinner Arctic ice cover: Increased potential for rapid, extensive sea-ice loss. Geophysical Research Letters 34, no. 24. L24501-n/a. doi:10.1029/2007GL032043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, W. N., F. Fetterer, M. Savoie, S. Mallory, R. Duerr, and J. Stroeve. 2017. NOAA/NSIDC climate data record of passive microwave sea ice concentration. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center. https://doi.org/10.7265/N59P2ZTG.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, W. N., and J. S. Stewart. 2019. Assessing uncertainties in sea ice extent climate indicators. Environmental Research Letters 14, no. 3: 035005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaf52c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melia, N., K. Haines, and E. Hawkins. 2016. Sea ice decline and 21st century trans‐Arctic shipping routes. Geophysical Research Letters 43, no. 18: 9720–8. doi:10.1002/2016GL069315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milinski, S., N. Maher, and D. Olonscheck. 2020. How large does a large ensemble need to be? Earth System Dynamics 11, no. 4: 885–901. doi:10.5194/esd-11-885-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mioduszewski, J., S. Vavrus, and M. Wang. 2018. Diminishing Arctic sea ice promotes stronger surface winds. Journal of Climate 31, no. 19: 8101–19. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0109.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, R., S. Pfirman, L. B. Tremblay, and P. DeRepentigny. 2017. Increasing transnational sea-ice exchange in a changing Arctic Ocean. Earth’s Future 5, no. 6: 633–47. doi:10.1002/2016EF000500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notz, D., and SIMIP Community. 2020. Arctic sea ice in CMIP6. Geophysical Research Letters 47, no. 10. doi:10.1029/2019GL086749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olason, E., and D. Notz. 2014. Drivers of variability in Arctic sea-ice drift speed. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans119, no. 9: 5755–75. doi:10.1002/2014JC009897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overland, J. E. 2020. Less climatic resilience in the Arctic. Weather and Climate Extremes 30: 100275. doi:10.1016/j.wace.2020.100275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, G., W. N. Meier, D. J. Scott, and M. H. Savoie. 2013. A long-term and reproducible passive microwave sea ice concentration data record for climate studies and monitoring. Earth System Science Data 5, no. 2: 311–8. doi:10.5194/essd-5-311-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricker, R., S. Hendricks, L. Kaleschke, X. Tian-Kunze, J. King, and C. Haas. 2017. A weekly Arctic sea-ice thickness data record from merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS satellite data. The Cryosphere 11, no. 4: 1607–23. doi:10.5194/tc-11-1607-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, A. J., R. Lindsay, J. Zhang, M. Steele, H. Stern, and R. Kwok. 2011. Uncertainty in modeled Arctic sea ice volume. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 116, no. 9: 1–21. doi:10.1029/2011JC007084.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger, A. J., M. Steele, J. Zhang, G. W. K. Moore, and K. L. Laidre. 2021. Accelerated sea ice loss in the Wandel Sea points to a change in the Arctic’s Last Ice Area. Communications Earth & Environment 2, no. 1: 1–12. doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00197-5.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Z., A. Duan, D. Li, and J. Li. 2021. Assessment and ranking of climate models in Arctic Sea ice cover simulation: From CMIP5 to CMIP6. Journal of Climate 34, no. 9: 3609–27. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0294.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, Q., Q. Wang, Z. Song, F. Qiao, J. Zhao, M. Chu, and X. Li. 2020. Assessment of sea ice extent in CMIP6 with comparison to observations and CMIP5. Geophysical Research Letters 47, no. 9. doi:10.1029/2020GL087965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibul, G., and J. G. Jin. 2021. Evaluating the feasibility of combined use of the Northern Sea Route and the Suez Canal Route considering ice parameters. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 147, no. March: 350–69. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.024.
   Google Scholar
• Stroeve, J., A. Barrett, M. Serreze, and A. Schweiger. 2014. Using records from submarine, aircraft and satellites to evaluate climate model simulations of Arctic sea ice thickness. Cryosphere 8, no. 5: 1839–54. doi:10.5194/tc-8-1839-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroeve, J., and D. Notz. 2018. Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons. Environmental Research Letters 13(10): 103001. Institute of Physics Publishing. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aade56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J., and W. E. Rogers. 2014. Swell and sea in the emerging Arctic Ocean. Geophysical Research Letters 41, no. 9: 3136–40. doi:10.1002/2014GL059983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, M. L., and J. Marshall. 2020. Understanding Arctic Ocean circulation: A review of ocean dynamics in a changing climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 125, no. 4: 1–35. doi:10.1029/2018JC014378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschudi, M. A., J. C. Stroeve, and J. S. Stewart. 2016. Relating the age of Arctic Sea Ice to its thickness, as measured during NASA’s ICESat and IceBridge campaigns. Remote Sensing (Basel, Switzerland) 8, no. 6: 457. doi:10.3390/rs8060457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavrus, S. J., and M. M. Holland. 2021. When will the Arctic Ocean become ice-free? Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 53: 217–8. doi:10.1080/15230430.2021.1941578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., R. M. Graham, K. Wang, S. Gerland, and M. A. Granskog. 2019. Comparison of ERA5 and ERA-Interim near-surface air temperature, snowfall and precipitation over Arctic sea ice: Effects on sea ice thermodynamics and evolution. The Cryosphere 13, no. 6: 1661–79. doi:10.5194/tc-13-1661-2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., J. Key, R. Kwok, and J. Zhang. 2016. Comparison of Arctic sea ice thickness from satellites, aircraft, and PIOMAS data. Remote Sensing 8, no. 9: 713. doi:10.3390/rs8090713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M., W. Maslowski, Y. J. Lee, J. C. Kinney, and R. Osinski. 2021. A spatial evaluation of Arctic sea ice and regional limitations in CMIP6 historical simulations. Journal of Climate 34, no. 15: 6399–420. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0491.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, T., Q. Yan, W. Qi, M. Ding, and C. Wang. 2020. Projections of Arctic sea ice conditions and shipping routes in the twenty-first century using CMIP6 forcing scenarios. Environmental Research Letters 15, no. 10: 104079. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abb2c8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. M., and L. H. Erikson. 2021. Knowledge gaps update to the 2019 IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere: Prospects to refine coastal flood hazard assessments and adaptation strategies with at-risk communities of Alaska. Frontiers in Climate 3, no. December: 1–11. doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.761439.
   Google Scholar
• Wyburn-Powell, C., A. Jahn, and M. R. England. 2022. Modeled interannual variability of Arctic sea ice cover is within observational uncertainty. Journal of Climate 35, no. 20: 3227–42. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0958.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and D. A. Rothrock. 2003. Modeling global sea ice with a thickness and enthalpy distribution model in generalized curvilinear coordinates. Monthly Weather Review 131, no. 5: 845–61. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0845:mgsiwa>2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., B. Wang, and F. Huang. 2022. Evaluating sea ice thickness simulation is critical for projecting a summer ice-free Arctic Ocean. Environmental Research Letters 17, no. 11: 114033. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac9d4d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar