18
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Institutional Design of Courses: Insights from the Rhetorical and Strategic Study of Credibility

&
Pages 499-507 | Published online: 13 Apr 2018

References

  • Applbaum, R. L., and K. W. Anatol. 1973. “Dimensions of Source Credibility.” Speech Monographs, 40:230–237.
  • Asch, Solomon E. 1946. “Forming Impressions of Personality.” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 41:258–290.
  • Beatty, M., R. Behnke, and L. Henderson. 1980. “An Empirical Validation of the Receiver Apprehension Test as a Measure of Trait Listening.” Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44:132– 136.
  • Berlo, D., J. Lemert, and R. Mertz. 1969. “Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 33:563–576.
  • Cooper, P., and C. Simonds. 1999. Communication for the Classroom Teacher, 6th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Dixit, Avinash K., and Barry J. Nalebuff. 1991. Strategic Games. New York: Norton.
  • Falaschetti, Dino, and Gary Miller. 2001. “Constraining Leviathan: Moral Hazard and Credible Commitment in Constitutional Design.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13(4):389–411.
  • Fox, Richard L., and Shirley A. RonKowski. 1997. “Learning Styles of Political Science Students.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 30:732–737.
  • Gilbert, D. T., and Patrick S. Malone. 1995. “The Correspondence Bias.” Psychological Bulletin, 117(1):21–38.
  • Gundlach, Gregory T., Ravi S. Achrol, and John Mentzer. 1995. “The Structure of Commitment in Exchange.” Journal of Marketing, 59(1):78–92.
  • Haleta, L. 1996. “Student Perceptions of Teachers’ Use of Language: The Effects of Powerful and Powerless Language on Impression Formation and Uncertainty.” Communication Education, 45:16–28.
  • Hinckley, Ronald H. and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1998. National Issues Credibility Index Study. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
  • Ichheiser, Gustav. 1949. Misunderstandings in Human Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jacobs, Lawrence R., Robert Y. Shapiro, and Ronald H. Hinckley. 1999. The Credibility Crisis: Congress and the Press Neglect Sources Americans Believe the Most. A Research/Strategy/Management, Inc. Report.
  • Kougl, K. 1997. Communicating in the Classroom. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
  • Kouzes, J., and B. Posner. 1993. Credibility: How Leaders Gain It and Lose It, Why People Demand It. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kvam, Paul H. 2000. “The Effect of Active Learning Methods on Student Retention in Engineering Statistics.” The American Statistician, 54:138–140.
  • Leathers, D. 1992. Successful Nonverbal Communication: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: MacMillan.
  • Macneil, Ian R. 1980. The New Social Contract: An Inquiry Into Modern Contractual Relations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Markham, D. 1968. “The Dimensions of Source Credibility of Television Newscasters.” Journal of Communication, 18:57–64.
  • McCroskey, James C. 1966. “Scales for the Measurement of Ethos.” Speech Monographs, 33:65–72.
  • McCroskey, James C. 1997. An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication, 7th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • McCroskey, James C. 1999. An Introduction to Communication in the Classroom. Edina, MN: Burgess International.
  • McCroskey, James C., and T. A. Jensen. 1975. “Image of Mass Media News Sources.” Journal of Broadcasting, 19:169–180.
  • McCroskey, James C., and Virginia Richmond. 1996. Fundamentals of Human Communication: An Interpersonal Perspective. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
  • McCroskey, James C., and T. J. Young. 1981. “Ethos and Credibility: The Construct and Its Measurement After Three Decades.” Central States Speech Journal, 32:24–34.
  • Mehrabian, Albert. 1970. Tactics of Social Influence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Mehrabian, Albert. 1981. Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Meyer, J. P. and N. J. Allen. 1991. “A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment.” Human Resource Management Review, 1:61–89.
  • Miller, Gary. 2000. “Above Politics: Credible Commitment and Efficiency in the Design of Public Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2):289–327.
  • Norman, W. T. 1963. “Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66:574–583.
  • Osgood, C. E., G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Powell, F. Chuck, and J. W. Wanzenried. 1995. “Do Current Measures of Dimensions of Source Credibility Produce Stable Outcomes in Replicated Tests?” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81:675–687.
  • Ross, L., and R. E. Nisbett. 1991. The Person and the Situation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Russ, Travis L., Cheri J. Simonds, and Stephen K. Hunt. 2003. “Coming Out in the Classroom…An Occupational Hazard?: The Influence of Sexual Orientation on Teacher Credibility and Perceived Student Learning.” Communication Abstracts, 26(1):3–151.
  • Salemi, Michael K. 2002. “An Illustrated Case for Active Learning.” Southern Economic Journal, 68:721– 731.
  • Shepsle, Kenneth. 1991. “Discretion, Institutions, and the Problem of Government Commitment.” In Pierre Bordieu and James S. Coleman, eds., Social Theory for a Changing Society. New York: Westview Press.
  • Teven, J., and J. McCroskey. 1997. “The Relationship of Perceived Teacher Caring with Student Learning and Teacher Evaluation.” Communication Education, 46:1–9.
  • Tuppen, C. J. S. 1974. “Dimensions of Communicator Credibility: An Oblique Solution.” Speech Monographs, 41:253–260.
  • Watson, David L., Debra A. Kessler, and Samia Kalla. 1996. “Active Learning Exercises are More Motivating than Quizzes for Underachieving College Students.” Psychological Reports, 78:131–134.
  • Whitehead, J. L. 1968. “Factors of Source Credibility.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54:59–63.
  • Wilson, Rick K. and Carl M. Rhodes. 1997. “Leadership and Credibility in N-Person Coordination Games.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(6):767–791.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.