References
- Adams, G. B., and J. D. White. 1994. “Dissertations in Public Administration and Cognate Fields: An Assessment of Methods and Quality.” Public Administration Review, 54(6):565–576.
- American Society for Public Administration. 2003. “Doctoral Degrees Awarded in Public Affairs and Administration at NASPAA Member Schools.” Public Administration Times (Education Supplement).
- American Society for Public Administration. 2004. “Doctoral Degrees Awarded in Public Affairs and Administration at NASPAA Member Schools.” Public Administration Times (Education Supplement).
- American Society for Public Administration. 2005. “Doctoral Degrees Awarded in Public Affairs and Administration at NASPAA Member Schools.” Public Administration Times (Education Supplement).
- American Society for Public Administration. 2006. “Doctoral Degrees Awarded in Public Affairs and Administration at NASPAA Member Schools.” Public Administration Times (Education Supplement).
- Brewer, G. A., J. W. Douglas, R. W. Facer II, and L. J. O’Toole, Jr. 1999. “Determinants of Graduate Research Productivity in Doctoral Programs of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review, 59(5):373–382.
- Cleary, E. R. 2000. “The Public Administration Doctoral Dissertation Reexamined: An Evaluation of the Dissertations of 1998.” Public Administration Review, 60(5):446–455.
- Douglas, J. W. 1999. “Faculty Graduate Student, and Graduate Productivity in Public Administration and Public Affairs Programs, 1986-1993.” Public Administration Review, 56(5):433–440.
- Felbinger, C. L., M. Holzer, and J. D. White. 1999. “The Doctorate in Public Administration: Some Unsolved Questions and Recommendations.” Public Administration Review, 59(5):459–464.
- Raadschelders, C. N. J., and J. W. Douglas. 2003. “The Doctoral Graduate in Public Administration: Apprentice or Master?” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(4):229–243.
- White, J. D., Guy B. Adams, and J. P. Forrester. 1996. “Knowledge and Theory Development in Public Administration: The Role of Doctoral Education in Research.” Public Administration Review, 56(5):441–452.