Analyzing Policy Fields: Helping Students Understand Complex State and Local Contexts

References

• Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, Robert. 2001. “American Federalism and the Search for Models of Management.” Public Administration Review, 61(6):671–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, David F., et al. 2005. “Integrating Modes of Systems Thinking into Strategic Planning Education and Practice: The Thinking Persons’ Institute Approach.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(3):265–293.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Robert. 2002. “Policy Tools Theory and Implementation Networks: Understanding State Enterprise Zone Partnerships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2):161–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, Lisa Blomgren, Jodi R. Sandfort, and Rosemary O’Leary. 2008. “Learning to Do and Doing to Learn: Teaching Managers to Collaborate in Networks.” In Lisa Blomgren Bingham and Rosemary O’Leary, eds., Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, John, Barbara Crosby, and Melissa Stone. 2006. “The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature.” Public Administration Review, 66(s1):44–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, John, Fran Ackermann, Colin Eden, and Charles B. Finn. 2004. Visible Thinking. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, John. 2004a. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations, 3rd edition. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, John. 2004b. “What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques.” Public Management Review, 6(1):21–53.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. 1991. “Policy Domains: Organization, Culture, and Policy Outcomes.” Annual Review of Sociology, 17:327–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Chung-Lae, and Deil S. Wright. 2004. “The Devolution Revolution in Intergovernmental Relations in the 1990s: Changes in Cooperative and Coercive State-National Relations as Perceived by State Administrators.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4):447–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, John E. 1985. “The Political Economy of Federalism.” The American Political Science Review, 79(4):994–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul J. 1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In L. G. Zucker, ed., Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., and W. Powell. 1991. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” In W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobel, Patrick J., and Angela Day. 2005. “A Note on Mapping: Understanding Who Can Influence Your Success.” University of Washington: Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs. Available at www.hallway.org.
   Google Scholar
• Elazar, Daniel J. 1965. “The Shaping of Intergovernmental Relations in the Twentieth Century.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 359(1):10–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, Neil. 2001. “Social Skill and the Theory of Fields.” Sociological Theory, 19(2):105–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Foundation Center. 2006. “Highlights of Foundation Yearbook.” New York, NY: The Foundation Center. Available at http://www.foundationcenter.org/gainknowledge/research/pdf/fy2006highlights.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pittman Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, Joseph. 1979. Exchange Networks and Community Politics. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, Edward G., and Mara S. Sidney. 1997. “Local Policy Subsystems and Issue Definition: An Analysis of Community Development Policy Change.” Urban Affairs Review, 32(4):490–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granados, Francisco J., and David Knoke. 2005. “Organized Interest Groups and Policy Networks.” In T. Janoski et al., eds, In Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 287–309.
   Google Scholar
• Grønbjerg, Kirsten, and Laurie Paarlberg. 2001. “Community Variations in the Size and Scope of the Nonprofit Sector.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4):684–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjern, Benny, and David O. Porter. 1981. “Implementation Structures: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis.” Organizational Studies 2(3):211–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isett, Kimberly R. 2006. “Managing Uncertainties in Networks.” Public Management Review, 8(1):176–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, Donald. 2006. “Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative.” Public Administration Review, 66(s1):10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, Walter J. M., Eric-Hans Klijn, and J. F. M. Koppenjan, eds. 1997. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, Eric-Hans. 1997. “Policy Networks: An Overview.” In W. J. M. Kickert, E. Klijn, and J. F. M. Koppenjan, eds., Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publications, 206–238.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, Eric-Hans, and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 2000. “Public Management and Policy Networks: Foundations of a Network Approach to Governance.” Public Management, 2(2):135–158.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, David, and Edward Laumann. 1982. “The Social Organization of National Policy Domains: An Exploration of Some Structural Hypotheses.” In Peter Marsden and Nan Lin, eds., Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, Edward O., and David Knoke. 1987. The Organization State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Norton E. 1958. “The Local Community as an Ecology of Games.” American Journal of Sociology, 64(3):251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., and Keith Provan. 2006. A Manager’s Guide for Choosing and Using Networks. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Management of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. Brinton, and Gary L. Wamsley. 1984. “Policy Subsystems, Networks, and the Tools of Public Management.” In R. Eyestone, ed., Public Policy Formation. Boulder: Westview Press, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., and K. G. Provan. 2000. “Governing the Hollow State.” Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 10(2):359–380.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Laurence, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2004. “Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4):469–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 1997. “Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review, 57:45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., and John Pierre. 1998. “Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 8(2):223–243.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Paul. 1995. The Price of Federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, Jon, and Edson Spencer. 2000. “Dynamics of Corporate Philanthropy in Minnesota.” In S. R. Graubard, ed., Minnesota, Real and Imagined. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and H. Milward. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40:1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 1994. “Integration of Community-Based Services for the Severely Mentally Ill and the Structure of Public Funding: A Comparison of Flow Systems.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 19(4):865–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, Keith G., Mark A. Veazie, Lisa K. Staten, and Nicolette I. Teufel-Shone. 2005. “The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen Community Partnerships.” Public Administration Review, 65(5):603–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, Lester M. 2005. “Training Professional Citizens: Getting Beyond the Right Answer to the Wrong Question in Public Affairs Education.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(1):7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. 2002. The Tools of Government Action: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. 1999. “The Structural Impediments to Human Service Collaboration: The Case of Front-line Welfare Reform Implementation.” Social Service Review, 73(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., and John W. Meyer. 1991. “The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence.” In W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Melissa, and Jodi R. Sandfort. Forthcoming. “Constructing Policy Fields to Inform Research in Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.
   Google Scholar