Leading and Governing: A Model for Local Government Education

References

• Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, Robert. 2003. Leveraging Networks: A Guide for Public Managers Working Across Organizations. Arlington, VA: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, Lisa Blomgren, Tina Nabatchi, and Rosemary O’Leary. 2005. “The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government.” Public Administration Review, 65(5):547–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, Phillip. 2003. “Public Leadership and the School Of Government: What Is It, What Should We Do, How Should We Do It?” School of Government, Learning Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Phillip, Donna Warner, and Susan Austin. 2003. “The Job of County Commissioners: What Do Commissioners Need to Know to Govern North Carolina’s Counties?” School of Government, Learning Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Phillip, and Donna Warner. 2001. “Training for New Mayors and Board Members.” School of Government, Learning Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Phillip, and Donna Warner. 2000. “Public Management Competencies and Abilities.” School of Government, Learning Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Boyte, Harry C. 2005. “Reframing Democracy: Governance, Civic Agency, and Politics.” Public Administration Review, 65(5):537–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, Gene A., Sally C. Selden, and Rex Facer II. 2000. “Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation.” Public Administration Review, 60(3):254–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, Gene A., and Sally C. Selden. 1998. “Whistleblowers in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethic.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3):413–439.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, Janet V., and Kelly B. Campbell. 2005. “Education in Public Administration: Finding the Fit Between Purpose and Approach.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(3):169–180.
   Google Scholar
• Forrer, John, James Edwin Kee, and Seth Gabriel. 2007. “Not Your Father’s Public Administration.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2):265–280.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. George. 1999. “The Repositioning of American Public Administration.” PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(4):701–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. George. 1991. “Toward a Theory of the Public for Public Administration.” Administration and Society, 22(4):395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, Brian R., and Luther F. Carter. 2002. “Executive Education for State and Local Government: A Survey.” International Journal of Public Administration, 25(8):953–973.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, Robert W., Myrna P. Mandell, and American Society for Public Administration. 1990. Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Heifetz, Ronald A. 1994. Leadership Without Easy Answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heifetz, Ronald A., and Martin Linsky. 2002. Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive Through the Dangers of Leading. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, David, J. 2000. “Public-Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4):713–727.
   Google Scholar
• Ingraham, Patricia W., and Laurence E Lynn. 2004. The Art of Governance: Analyzing Management and Administration. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Willow. 2003. Receptivity to Change in the Public Sector: Two Federal Case Studies. Unpublished dissertation, Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, Donald F. 2002. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koliba, Christopher. 2007. “Engagement, Scholarship, and Faculty Work: Trends and Implications for Public Affairs Education.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2):315–334.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J., ed. 1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leete, Laura, and Steven Maser. 2007. “Helping Legislators Legislate: An Executive Education Program for State Senators.” Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2):187–204.
   Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, Brinton, and Keith Provan. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1):1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, Brinton, and Keith Provan. 1998. “Measuring Network Structure.” Public Administration, 76(2):387–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, Henry. 2004. “Third-Generation Management Development.” Training and Development, 58(3):28.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbandian, John. 1999. “Facilitating Community, Enabling Democracy: New Roles for Local Government Managers.” Public Administration Review, 59(3):187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Laurence J. 1997. “Implementing Public Innovations in Network Settings.” Administration and Society, 29(2):115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, James L. 1996. “Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1):5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, James L. 1997. “Antecedents of Public Service Motivation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2):118–97.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, James L., and Lois R. Wise. 1990. “The Motivational Bases of Public Service.” Public Administration Review, 50(3):367–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. Guy. 1996. The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, J. W., and R. Matson. 1992. “Why Executive Development Programs (Alone) Don’t Work.” Training & Development, May:91–95.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, Keith G., and Brinton H. Milward. 2001. “Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks.” Public Administration Review, 61(4):414–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, Hal G. 1997. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, Hal. 1982. “Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers.” American Review of Public Administration, 16(4):288–302.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N., and E. Czempiel, eds. 1992. Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, Lester, ed. 2002. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg, Carl W., Vaughn M. Upshaw, and Donna E. Warner. 2008. “Lessons from an Executive Leadership Program.” In Ricardo S. Morse and Terry F. Buss, Innovations in Public Leadership Development. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Donna. 2001. “Institute of Government Public Management Focus Group Results.” School of Government Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmer, Dennis. 1991. “Serving the People or Serving for Pay: Reward Preferences among Government, Hybrid Sector, and Business Managers.” Public Productivity and Management Review, 14(4):369–83.
   Google Scholar