Social Network Analysis (SNA) Applications in Evaluating MPA Classes

References

• Analytic Technologies. (2008). Centrality. Retrieved February 21, 2008, from Analytic Technologies: http://www.analytictech.com/networks/centrali.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Belotti, E. (2009). Brokerage roles between cliques: A secondary clique analysis. Methodological Innovations Online, 4, 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. C., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bossert, S. (1988–89). Cooperative activities in the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 15, 225–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “Conversation of Mankind.” College English, 46(7), 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H., Lee, J., Stefanone, M., & Gay, G. (2005). Development of computer supported collaborative social networks in a distributed learning community. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(6), 435–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., & Haase, T. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action: The impact of Hurricane Katrina on communications infrastructure. Public Works Management and Policy, 10(3), 328–343.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R., & Thomas, R. J. (2009). Driving results through social networks: How top organizations leverage networks for performance and growth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitracopoulou, A., & Petrou, A. (n.d.). Publications and talks. Kaleidoscope, interaction analysis: Supporting participants in technology based learning activities. Retrieved on May 16, 2008, from http://www.rhodes.aegean.gr/LTEE/kaleidoscopeicalts/Publications/dimitracopoulou_petrou_Themes.pdf (Last retrieved on May 16, 2008. Article no long available at this site).
   Google Scholar
• Durland, M. M., & Fredericks, K. A. (2006). Social network analysis in program evaluation. San Francisco: Wiley Periodicals.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, D. I. (2000). Teaching with your mouth shut. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
   Google Scholar
• Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A. (2001). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multi-agency coordination, American Review of Public Administration (ARPA), 36(2), 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingus, M. S. (1999). Toward understanding the culture of Internet-mediated learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(3), 225.
   Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., and Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., Veazie, M. A., Staten, L. K., & Teufel-Shone, N. I. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P., Smith, B., Kruschwitz, N., Laur, J., & Schley, S. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Trimbur, J. (1989). Consensus and difference in collaborative learning. College English, 51(6), 602–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar