Public Administration Education in Pakistan: Does It Add Value in the Public Interest?

References

• Appleby, P. (1945). Big democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Aristigueta, M., & Gomes, K. M. B. (2006). Assessing performance in NASPAA graduate programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Baraibanti, R. (1966). Research on bureaucracy of Pakistan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B. (1979). On management of public service education. Southern Review of Public Administration, 3, 273–283.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B. (2001). The big questions of public administration education. Public Administration Review, 61, 526–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dolch, N. A., Ernst, M., McClusky, J. E., Mirabella, R. M., & Sadow, J. (2006). The nature of undergraduate nonprofit education: Models of curriculum delivery. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 28S–50S.
   Google Scholar
• Dolch, N. A., Kidwell, R., Jr., Sadow, J., & Smith, J. (1998). Nonprofit undergraduate education: Delivery models for curriculum within the American Humanics program. In M. O’Neill & K. Fletcher (Eds.), Nonprofit management education: U. S. and world perspectives (pp. 81–94). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, R. F. (2002). Toward becoming a learning organization: Outcomes assessment, NASPAA accreditation, and mission-based capstone courses. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 8(3), 193–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jadoon, M. Z. I., & Jabeen, N. (2010). Public administration education in Pakistan: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Pakistan Vision, 11(1), 120–141.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, E. T. (1989). Accountability, program quality, outcome assessment, and graduate education for public affairs and administration. Public Administration Review, 49(5), 438–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of ASTD, 13(11), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1976). Evaluating training programs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs (2nd ed.). San Francisco: BerrettKoehler.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B. (2004). Using logic models. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 96–113). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• NASPAA. (2008, January). General information and standards for professional master’s degree programs. Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/NS/naspaastandards.asp
   Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K., & Allen, H. (2010). Public service education: Adding value in the public interest. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(2), 207–229.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K., Allen, H., & Baradei, L. E. (2010). Improving public service education programs through assessing the performance of MPA alumni. International Journal of Public Administration, 33, 311–324.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. J. (1997). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods (3rd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. E. (2001). Using stakeholder surveys in MPA program performance measurement. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 7(1), 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wamsley, G. L., Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., et al. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. D. (1949). Introduction to the study of public administration (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager, S. J., Hildreth, W. B., Miller, G., & Rabin, J. (2007). What difference does having an MPA make? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 147–167.
   Google Scholar