An Ostrich Burying Its Head in the Sand? The 2009 NASPAA Standards and Scope of Information Technology and E-Government Curricula

References

• Berry, F. (2011). The changing climate for public affairs education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 17(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, J. S., Chen, F. F., Tinkersley, W. B., & Hillard, K. R. (1993). Patterns in MPA admission decisionmaking: An application of social judgment theory. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(3), 356–372.
   Google Scholar
• Bretschneider, B. (1985). Teaching computer technology for information management in schools of public affairs and administration. Social Science Computer Review, 3(2), 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bretschneider, S. I., & Mergel, I. (2011). Technology and public management information systems: Where we have been and where we are going. In D. C. Menzel & H. L. White (Eds.), The state of public administration: Issues, challenges and opportunities (pp. 187–203). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. M. (2015). Revisiting the IT productivity paradox. American Review of Public Administration, 45(5), 565–583. doi:10.1177/0275074014523102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (1998). Public sector information technology initiatives: Implications for programs of public administration. Administration and Society, 30(4), 421–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. M., Brudney, J. L., & Waugh, W. L. (2005). Bridging the gap between information technology needs in the public sector and in public administration graduate education. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Handbook of public information systems (2nd ed., pp. 11–26). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buffat, A. (2015). Street-level bureaucracy and e-government. Public Management Review, 17(1), 149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, R. E. (1990). What do public administration masters programs look like? Do they do what is needed? Public Administration Review, 50(6), 663–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. (2004). Training the IT-savvy public manager: Priorities and strategies for public management education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. (2008). The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review, 68, s86–s102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C., & Jacob, B. (2014). Big data in the public sector: Lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration and Society (Advance online publication). doi:10.1177/0095399714555751.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006a). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006b). New public management is dead— long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, P., & Alfonso, X. (2009). E-government and the transformation agenda. Public Administration, 87(2), 371–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S. (2011). Uses of public participation geographic information systems applications in e-government. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. (2006). Public information technology and e-governance: Managing the virtual state. Burlington, VT: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ginn, M. H., & Hammond, A. (2012). Online education in public affairs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(2). Retrieved from http://www.westgaedu/~distance/ojdla/summer152/ginn_hammond152.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S. (2007). Pessimism, computer failure, and information systems development in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 917–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, A. (2015). Surveillance, transparency, and democracy: Public administration in the information age. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing e-government: An international text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Lin, W. (2007). A longitudinal perspective on MPA education in the United States. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(2), 345–364.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Schwester, R. W. (2015). Public administration: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Margetts, H. (2010). Cyber-bureaucracy: If information technology is so central to public administration, why is it so ghetto-ized? In J. Pierre & P. W. Ingraham (Eds.), Comparative administrative change and reform (pp. 114–135). Montreal, QC: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hy, R. J., Waugh, W., & Brudney, J. L. (1993). An assessment of institutional arrangement and microcomputer skills and competencies in public administration graduate education. International Journal of Public Administration, 16(4), 467–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel, L. D. (1986). Information systems education in masters programs in public affairs and administration. Public Administration Review, 46 (Special issue), 590–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel, L. D. (1987). Requiring computer and information systems courses in MPA curricula: A report of faculty opinion. Social Science Microcomputer Review, 5(3), 341–346.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., & Layne, K. (2001). Making the connection: E-government and public administration education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 7(4), 229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Koven, S. G., Goetzke, K., & Brennan, M. (2008). Profiling public affairs programs: The view from the top. Administration and Society, 40(7), 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer, K., Bergin, T., Bretschneider, S., Duncan, G., Foss, T., Gorr, W., et al. (1986). Curriculum recommendations for public management education in computing: The final report of the NASPAA Ad Hoc Committee on Computers in Public Management Education. Social Science Computer Review, 4(1), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open Government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. San Francisco, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lavertu, S. (2015). We all need help: “Big data” and the mismeasure of public administration. Public Administration Review (Advance online publication). doi:10.1111/puar.12436.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2012). Social media in the public sector: Participation, collaboration, and transparency in a networked world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2013). Social media in the public sector. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Milakovich, M. E. (2012). Digital governance: New technologies for improving public service and participation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E. (1967). The search for identity of graduate schools of public affairs. Public Administration Review, 27(4), 343–356.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., Lee, J., & Roh, C-Y. (2014). The evolution of internal IT applications and e-government studies in public administration: Research themes and methods. Administration and Society, 46(1), 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) and ICF International. (2015). Federal leaders digital insight study. Retrieved from http://napawash.org/images/reports/2015/Federal_Leaders_Digital_Insights_Study.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA). (2006). City and county manager survey (result summary). Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/execMPA/naspaa_surveys/CityManagerSurvey.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA). (2007). Federal employer survey (result summary). Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/execMPA/naspaa_surveys/FederalEmployerSurvey.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration (NASPAA), Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation. (2014). NASPAA standards: Accreditation standards for master’s degree programs. Retrieved from https://naspaaaccreditation.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/naspaa-accreditation-standards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F. (2010). E-government 2020: Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose. Public Administration Review, 70 (s1), s180–s181.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grass roots: Tortoise or hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local e-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northrop, A. (1997). Public administration: Computing education in public administration journals and textbooks. Social Science Computer Review, 15(1), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, T. (2015). Disruptive power: The crisis of the state in the digital age. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. S., Lee, G., & DeLone, W. H. (2014). IT resources, organizational capabilities, and value creation in public-sector organizations: A public-value management perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 29(3), 187–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2011). Mainstreaming technological change in the study of public management. Public Policy and Administration, 26(4), 377–397.
   Google Scholar
• Raffel, J. A., Maser, S. M., & Calarusse, C. (2011). Accreditation and competencies in education for leadership. In D. C. Menzel & H. L. White (Eds.), The s tate of public administration: Issues, challenges and opportunities (pp. 70–88). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. (2013). Public administration and information technology. Burlington, VT: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rocheleau, B. (1998). The MPA core course in information technology: What should be taught? Why? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(3), 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H., & Naff, K. C. (2010). The status of law in contemporary public administration literature, education, and practice. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of pubic administration, public management, and public service around the world: The Minnowbrook perspective (pp. 211–220). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saltman, R. (1974). Educating public administrators for managing science and technology. Public Administration Review, 34(4), 343–356.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl, H. J. (2010). Electronic government (Advances in Management Information Systems [AMIS], Volume on Electronic Government). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Thielemann, K., & Sood, R. (2015). Market insight: State and local government IT market primer, United States, 2015 (Gartner Industry Market Strategies Worldwide). Retrieved from http://www.nascio.org/events/sponsors/vrc/Market Insight_State and Local Government IT.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. (2013). Smart cities big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2015). High-risk series: An update (Report No. GAO-15-290). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/668415.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2015). Analytical perspectives, budget of the United States government, fiscal year 2016. Washington, DC: U. S.Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, G., Hallenbeck, G., & Rubenstrunk, K. (2010). The CIO edge: Seven leadership skills you need to drive results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, D. (2005). Digital government technology and public sector performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2015). Managing information in the public sector. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar