Teaching Collaborative Governance Online: Aligning Collaborative Instruction with Online Learning Platforms

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). American federalism and the search for models of management. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 671–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, D. (2003). Towards the development of standards in emergency management Training and Education. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12(2), 113–124.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belanger, F., & Jordan, D. H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies, tools and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., Sandfort, J., & O’Leary, R. (2008). Learning to do and doing to learn: Teaching managers to collaborate in networks.” In L. B. Bingham & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 270–286). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, T. (2008). Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 63–92.
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, T. A., & Cooper, T. L. (2012). H. George Frederickson and the dialogue on citizenship in public administration. Public Administration Review, 72 (s1), s108–s116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (s1), 44–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcasson, M., & Bruns, M. (2009). Knowledge and skills relevant to local deliberative practice. Center for Public Deliberation, Colorado State University. Presentation slides on file at University Network for Collaborative Governance. In author’s possession.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. (2007). A practical guide to collaborative governance. Portland, OR: Policy Consensus Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, L., & Kan, A. (2002). Evaluation of factors related to student performance in a distance-learning business communication course. Journal of Education for Business, 77(5), 257–263.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, S. M. (1998). Models of asynchronous computer conferencing for collaborative learning in large college classes. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 157–182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Clow, D. (2013). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 185–189). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizencentered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66 (s1), 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. (2011.) Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Adaptation in collaborative governance regimes. Environmental Management, 54, 768–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Smutko, S. (2011). UNCG guide to collaborative competency. Portland, OR: Policy Consensus Initiative and University Network for Collaborative Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 441–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2007). Collaboration and institutional endurance in U. S. water policy. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40, 55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades Restoration Program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., Lubell, M., & Heikkila, T. (2013). The promise and performance of collaborative governance. In S. Kamieniecki & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Oxford handbook of US environmental policy (pp. 413–434). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by network. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management Review, 2(2), 337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010, June). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533.
   Google Scholar
• Kraiger, K. (2014). Looking back and looking forward: trends in training and development research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(4), 401–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, R. M. (2010). Leading across boundaries: Creating collaborative agencies in a networked world. San Francisco, CA: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mingus, M. S., & Horiuchi, C. M. (2012). On civility and resilient governance. Public Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, R. S. (2010). Integrative public leadership: Catalyzing collaboration to create public value. Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 231–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, R. S., & Stephens, J. B. (2012). Teaching collaborative governance: Phases, competencies, and case-based learning. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3), 565–584.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, G., & Tallent-Runnels, M. (2006). Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors’ demands and support in online and traditional classrooms. Internet and Higher Education, 9(4), 257–266.
   Google Scholar
• Nkonge, B., & Geuldenzolph, L. (2006). Best practices in online education: Implications for policy and practice. Business Education Digest, 15, 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (2007). A manager’s guide to resolving conflicts in collaborative networks. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., Choi, Y., & Gerard, C. M. (2012). The skill set of the successful collaborator. Public Administration Review, 72 (s1), s70–s83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2003). Entrepreneurial strategies for managing interagency collaboratives. Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 311–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, D. D. (2008). Cross-disciplinary collaboration and learning. Ecology and Society, 13(80). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/unf_research/38.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Environments, 6(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rofe, J. S. (2011). The “IR” model: A schema for pedagogic design and development in international relations distance learning programmes. European Political Science, 10(1), 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distant Learning, 5, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (6th ed.). New York, NY: Broadway Business.
   Google Scholar
• Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2006). The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: A meta-analysis. Personnel psychology, 59(3), 623–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public administration review, 66 (s1), 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topper, A. (2007). Are they the same? Comparing instructional quality of online and face-toface graduate education courses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., Lovrich, N. P., & Gaffney, M. (2005). Collaboration, enforcement, and endangered species: A framework for assessing collaborative problem-solving capacity. Society & Natural Resources, 18, 677–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., Pollock, P. H., & Hamann, K. (2007). Does active learning enhance learner outcomes? Evidence from discussion participation in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(2), 131–142.
   Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski, A., & Palmer, L. B. (2005). Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(2). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/L_Palmer/publication/228433849_Individual_student_characteristics_Can_any_be_predictors_of_success_in_online_classes/links/5527c6360cf29b22c9b94399.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., & Rose, C. P. (2013). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS Data-Driven Education Workshop, 11, 14.
   Google Scholar