Developing organizational leaders to manage publicness: A conceptual framework

References

• Alford, J. (2002). Defining the client in the public sector: A social‐exchange perspective. Public Administration Review, 62, 337–346. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. T. (1987). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (eds), Classics of public administration (pp. 510–529). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2011). Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i301–i319. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsen, M., & Jørgensen, T. B. (1997). The ‘publicness’ of public organizations. Public Administration, 75, 337–357. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39, 97–122. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2013). What organization theorists and public policy researchers can learn from one another: Publicness theory as a case-in-point. Organization Studies, 34, 169–188. doi:10.1177/0170840612473549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1994). The “publicness puzzle” in organization theory: A test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 197–224.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Moulton, S. (2011). Integrative publicness: A framework for public management strategy and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i363–i380. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur031
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Straussman, J. D. (1990). Public management strategies: Guidelines for managerial effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bretschneider, S. (1990). Management information systems in public and private organizations: An empirical test. Public Administration Review, 5, 536–545. doi:10.2307/976784
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A., & Brewer, Jr., G. A. (2011). Parsing public/private differences in work motivation and performance: An experimental study. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i347–i362. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., & Roering, W. D. (1988). Initiation of strategic planning by governments. Public Administration Review, 48(6), 995. doi:10.2307/976996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. H., & Rainey, H. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity in US federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 1–30. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2005). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., & Welch, E. W. (2012). Realized publicness at public and private research universities. Public Administration Review, 72, 272–284. doi:10.1111/puar.2012.72.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. Jossey-Bass Incorporated Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science & Politics, 32(04), 701–712.
   Google Scholar
• Getha-Taylor, H. (2010). Human Relations 2.0. Public Administration Review, 70(S1), S170. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02265.x
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, S. M., & Naor, M. (2005). Linking publicness to operations management practices: A study of quality management practices in hospitals. Journal of Operations Management, 23, 209–228. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1977). Political Executives and the Washington Bureaucracy. Political Science Quarterly, 92(3), 395. doi:10.2307/2148500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J., & Fournier, E. (2004). Dimensions of publicness and performance in substance abuse treatment organizations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 49–70. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., James, O., & Scott, C. (2000). Regulation of government: Has it increased, is it increasing, should it be diminished? Public Administration, 78, 283–304. doi:10.1111/padm.2000.78.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. G. (2010). Administration without Borders. Public Administration Review, 70, s46–s55. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02245
   Google Scholar
• Lau, A. W., Newman, A. R., & Broedling, L. A. (1980). The nature of managerial work in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 40(5), 513. doi:10.2307/3110205
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility (Vol. 12, pp. 1–4). Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, C. C. (2014). Specifying and Testing a Multi-Dimensional Model of Publicness: A Analysis of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, C. C., Cordell, K., & Farnworth, M. D. (2018). Less is more? Publicness, management strategy, and organizational performance in mental health treatment facilities. Public Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Moulton, S. (2009). Putting together the publicness puzzle: A framework for realized publicness. Public Administration Review, 69, 889–900. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, S. (2010). Integrating the public in public administration: Envisioning the scholarly field in 2020. Public Administration Review, 70, s317–s318. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M. A. (1975). Comparing public and private management: An exploratory essay. Public Administration Review, 35(4), 364. doi:10.2307/974538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C., & Backoff, R. W. (1993). Organizational publicness and its implications for strategic management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 209–231.
   Google Scholar
• An Overview of NASPAA. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.naspaa.org/about_naspaa/about/overview.asp
   Google Scholar
• Petrovsky, N., James, O., & Boyne, G. A. (2015). New leaders’ managerial background and the performance of public organizations: The theory of publicness fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 217–236. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (2011). Sampling designs for analyzing publicness: Alternatives and their strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i321–i345. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36, 233–244. doi:10.2307/975145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (2010). Public administration: Traditions of inquiry and philosophies of knowledge. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. R. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 729–756. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024289
   Google Scholar
• School of Public and Environmental Affairs. (2015). SPEA Career Development Office 2015 Employment Outcomes Report. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. G., & Falcone, S. (1998). Comparing public and private organizations: An exploratory analysis of three frameworks. The American Review of Public Administration, 28, 126–145. doi:10.1177/027507409802800202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2003). Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 879–894. doi:10.1093/icc/12.4.879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., & Bozeman, B. (2011). Publicness and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i279–i281. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur025
   Google Scholar
• Wamsley, G. L., & Zald, M. N. (1973). The political economy of public organizations: A critique and approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 33, 62–73. doi:10.2307/974786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, G. F., & Brady, F. N. (1998). Do public-sector and private-sector personnel have different ethical dispositions? A study of two sites. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 93–115. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024375
   Google Scholar
• Wittmer, D., & Coursey, D. (1996). Ethical work climates: Comparing top managers in public and private organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 559–572. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024327
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., & Johansen, M. (2014). Public responsibility and inequality in health insurance coverage: An examination of American state health care systems. Public Administration, 92(2), 422–439.
   Google Scholar