References
- Bishu, S. G., Guy, M. E., & Heckler, N. (2019). Seeing gender and its consequences. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 7–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565039
- Chetkovich, C. (2019). How non-binary gender definitions confound (already complex) thinking about gender and public policy. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 88–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565050
- Edwards, L. H., Holmes, M. H., & Sowa, J. E. (2019). Including women in public affairs departments: Diversity is not enough. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 25–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565051
- Rauhaus, B. M., & Carr, I. A. S. (2019). The invisible challenges: Gender differences among public administration faculty. Journal of Public Affairs Education. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565040
- Stabile, B., Grant, A., & Salih, S. (2019). Gendered differences in choice of concentrations in master of public administration programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 69–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565052
- Stivers, C. (1995). Settlement women and bureau men: Constructing a usable past for public administration. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 522–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3110343
- Stivers, C. (2019). Forging new tools for new administrative houses: Comments on the symposium. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 4–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2019.1597673
- Thomas, N. (2019). In the service of social equity: Leveraging the experiences of African American women professors. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 47–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1565041
- Wang, F. (2018). Annual accreditation data report 2016–2017. Retrieved from https://www.naspaa.org/sites/default/files/docs/2018-12/2016-17-accr-data-report-final.pdf