Reflexive capacity in local networks for sustainable development: integrating conflict and understanding into a multi-level perspective Transition Framework

References

• van Assche, K., Duineveld, M., Beunen, R., & Teampau, P. (2011). Delineating locals: Transformations of knowledge/power and the governance of the Danube Delta. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2011.559087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Power in transition: An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(4), 543–569. doi: 10.1177/1368431009349830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, J., Stephens, J., & Haslett, T. (2009). Action research: Its foundations in open systems thinking and relationship to the scientific method. Systemic Practice & Action Research, 22(6), 475–488. doi:10.1007/s11213-009-9148-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., Dijkstra, G., Edwards, A., & Fenger, M. (Eds.). (2007). Governance and the democratic deficit. Assessing the democratic legitimicy of governance practices. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bosch, S. (2010). Transition experiments. Exploring societal changes towards sustainability. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, E., Dedeurwaerdere, T., & Siebenhüner, B. (2012). Introduction. In E. Brousseau, T. Dedeurwaerdere, & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T. R., & Ueberhorst, R. (1988). Creative democracy. Systematic conflict resolution and policymaking in a world of high science and technology. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2007). The contribution of network governance to sustainability impact assessment. In S. Thoyer & B. Martimort-Asso (Eds.), Participation for sustainability in trade (pp. S.209–S.228). Hampshire/Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, R., & Willems, H. (1992). Konfliktintervention. Perspektivübernahme in gesellschaftlichen Auseinandersetzungen (pp. 41–66). Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H. (2008). Nachhaltigkeit, Reflexivität und Verständigungsaufgaben: Konzeptionelle Ausgangsüberlegungen. In P. H. Feindt, M. Gottschick, T. Mölders, F. Müller, R. Sodtke, & S. Weiland (Eds.), Nachhaltige Agrarpolitik als reflexive Politik. Plädoyer für einen neuen Diskurs zwischen Politik und Wissenschaft (pp. 41–66). Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H. (2012). Reflexive governance and multilevel decision making in agricultural policy: Conceptual reflections and empirical evidence. In E. Brousseau, T. Dedeurwaerdere, & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Reflexive governance for global public goods (pp. 159–177). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., Canenbley, C., Gottschick, M., Müller, C., & Roedenbeck, I. (2004). Konflikte des Agrarsektors—eine Landkarte. Empirische Ergebnisse der konflikttheoretischen Fundierung der Nachhaltigkeitforschung (Vol. 12). Hamburg: BIOGUM Universität Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., Gottschick, M., Mölders, T., Müller, F., Sodtke, R., & Weiland, S. (2008a). Einleitung: Von der ‘Agrarwende’ zur reflexiven Agrarpolitik. In P. H. Feindt, M. Gottschick, T. Mölders, F. Müller, R. Sodtke, & S. Weiland (Eds.), Nachhaltige Agrarpolitik als reflexive Politik. Plädoyer für einen neuen Diskurs zwischen Politik und Wissenschaft (pp. 9–24). Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., Gottschick, M., Mölders, T., Müller, F., Sodtke, R., & Weiland, S. (Eds.). (2008b). Nachhaltige Agrarpolitik als reflexive Politik. Plädoyer für einen neuen Diskurs zwischen Politik und Wissenschaft. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (2008). Social network analysis. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2000). Transitites vanuit sociotechnisch perspectief. Maastricht: MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2010). The dynamics of transitions. A socio-technical perspective. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. new directions in the study of long term transformative change (pp. 9–101). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Genus, A., & Coles, A. M. (2008). Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 37(9), 1436–1445. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschick, M. (2008). Participatory sustainability impact assessment: Scientific policy advice as a social learning process. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(6), 479–495. doi:10.1007/s11213-008-9109-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschick, M. (2009). Konfliktbearbeitung im Bereich der Grünen Gentechnik durch partizipative Modellierung. In J. Göpfert & T. Moos (Eds.), Konfliktfelder beackern. Dialog- und Partizipationsverfahren bei fundamentalen Technikkonflikten am Beispiel der Grünen Gentechnik (pp. 121–132). Münster: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschick, M. (2011a, June 13–15). How to deal with (subtle) power in regional governance networks. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Sustainability Transitions. Diversity, plurality and change: Breaking new grounds in sustainability transition research, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschick, M. (2011b). Lokale Experimente als Mittel zur (De-) Institutionalisierung im Kontext des Transition Managements. In P. Cormont, & S. Frank (Eds.), Governance in der Klimaanpassung—Strukturen, Prozesse, Interaktionen. Dokumentation der Tagung der KLIMZUG-Verbünde an der TU Dortmund am 03.12.2010 (Vol. 20, pp. 123–134). Dortmund: Dynaklim-Publikation.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Conclusion: How to understand transitions? How to influence them? Synthesis and lessons for further research. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change (pp. 320–337). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grote, J. R., & Gbikpi, B. (Eds) (2002). Participatory Governance. Political and societal implications. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.), (2003). Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegger, D. L. T., Van Vliet, J., & Van Vliet, B. J. M. (2007). Niche management and its contribution to regime change: The case of innovation in sanitation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(6), 729–746. doi:10.1080/09537320701711215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2009). Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 341–368. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9095-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., … Zemp, E. (Eds.), (2008). Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, S., & Johnson, A. (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: An analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy, 28(9), 625–640. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00041-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, R. (2011). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse (SKAD), Human Studies, 34(1), 43–65. doi: 10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z doi: 10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2006). Transition management: A reflexive governance approach. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 103–130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–195. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, W. M. (Ed.). (2004). Governance for sustainable development. The challenge of adapting form to function. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lepsius, M. R. (1997). Institutionalisierung und Deinstitutionalisierung von Rationalitätskriterien. In G. Göhler (Ed.), Institutionenwandel. Leviathan Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft, Sonderheft 16/1996 (Vol. 16, pp. 57–69). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management. New modes of governance for sustainable development. Utrecht: International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: Participatory, multi-level—and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197–214. doi: 10.1002/eet.509
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Voß, J.-P., & Monstadt, J. (Eds.). (2008). Governance for sustainable development. Coping with ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prell, C., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (2009). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 22(6), 501–518. doi: 10.1080/08941920802199202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quack, S. (2005). Zum Werden und Vergehen von Institutionen. Vorschläge für eine dynamische Governanceanalyse. In G. F. Schuppert (Ed.), Governance-Forschung. Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien (1st ed., pp. 346–370). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research, participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (Vol. 2, pp. 327–399). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2010). Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance. A systemic and reflexive approach. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change (pp. 105–220). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schaper, J., Gottschick, M., & Suhari, M. (2012). Klimaanpassungskommunikation: Theoriebasierte Analyse im Rahmen regionaler Governance. Am Beispiel der Grundwasserproblematik in der Ostheide im Rahmen von KLIMZUG-NORD (Vol. 28). Hamburg: BIOGUM—Universität Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39(4), 763–770. doi: 10.1068/a39310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2010). The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society, 15(1), 11. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art11/ doi: 10.5751/ES-03218-150111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2008). ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science Technology and Human Values, 33(2), 262–294. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson Klein, J. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Ueberhorst, R. (1986). Methodische Reflexionen zu Beratungsprozessen im Interaktionsfeld ‘Wissenschaft-Politik-gesellschaftliche Gruppen’. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J. & Bornemann, B. (2011). The politics of reflexive governance: Challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society, 16(2): 9. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art9/
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (2006a). Reflexive governance: A view on an emerging path. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 419–436). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006b). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walk, H. (2008). Partizipative Governance. Beteiligungsformen und Beteiligungsrechte im Mehrebenensystem der Klimapolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedemann, P. M. (1994). Mediation bei umweltrelevanten Vorhaben: Entwicklungen, Aufgaben und Handlungsfelder. In C. Frank & P. M. Wiedemann (Eds.), Umweltkonflikte. Vermittlungsverfahren zur ihrer Lösung (pp. 177–194). Taunusstein: Blotter.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2008). Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt—eine Zwischenbilanz. In M. Zürn (Ed.), Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt (pp. S.553–S.580). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar