What ‘Works’ in Environmental Policy-Design? Lessons from Experiments in the Australian and Dutch Building Sectors

References

• Backstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., & Lovbrand, E. (2010). Environmental politics and deliberative democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2011). Understanding regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, D. P., & Diermeier, D. (2007). Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 599–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. (2008). Earth systems governance. In O. Young, L. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change (pp. 277–301). Cambride, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., & Hey, E. (2008). The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, J. J., & Brown, R. R. (2012). Governance experimentation and factors of success. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(7), 1340–1353. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24(4), 409–429. doi: 10.1037/h0027982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chulajata, I., & Turner, M. (2009). What happens when policies are transferred? International Journal of Asian-Pasific Studies, 5(1), 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2009). Influence: The power of persuasion. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, I., & Symes, M. (2009). Sustainable urban development. Vol. 4. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Croci, E. (2005). The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Croley, S. (2011). Beyond capture. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation (pp. 50–69). Northampton: Edwar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Darnall, N., & Sides, S. (2008). Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental programs. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 95–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00255.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M., & Smith, P. C. (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1991 [1927]). The public and its problems. Ohio: Swallow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. N. (2003). Public policy analysis an introduction. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. (2010). Doing well by doing good? American Economic Review, 100, 2492–2509. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.5.2492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eversole, R. (2010). Remaking participation. Community Development Journal, 47(1), 29–41. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsq033
   Google Scholar
• Fairman, R., & Yapp, C. (2005). Enforced self-regulation, prescription, and conceptions of compliance within small businesses. Law and Policy, 27(4), 491–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00209.x
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C., & Condon, M. (2011). New governance and the business organization. Law & Policy, 33(4), 449–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, D., & Schroder, M. (2003). The digest of social experiments (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. (2009). The new collaborative governance. Journal of Law and Society, 36(1), 145–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00461.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 't Hart, P. (1991). Irving L. Janis’ victims of groupthink. Political Psychology, 12(2), 247–278. doi: 10.2307/3791464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2012). The carbon crunch. New Haven: Yale Universtity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., & Eckert, S. (2008). New modes of governance in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, C., Gunningham, N., & Shearing, C. (2012). The new environmental governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, R. B., Hadda, B. M., & Paton, B. (2000). The economics of energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 28(6–7), 477–486. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2012). The lessons of failure. International Political Science Review, 33(5), 539–555. doi: 10.1177/0192512112453603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, B. (2011). Understanding the new regulatory governance. Law & Policy, 33(4), 459–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2007). Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of new policy instruments in comparative perspective. Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R., & Zito, A. (2013). Still the century of 'new' environmental policy instruments? Environmental Politics, 22(1), 155–173. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, M., & Anton, W. R. Q. (2002). Corporate environmental management. Land Economics, 78(4), 539–558. doi: 10.2307/3146852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. doi: 10.2307/973677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobel, O. (2004). The renew deal. Minesota Law Review, 89(2), 263–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. (2003). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In N. J. Clifford & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key methods in geography (pp. 117–132). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2007). Environmental public voluntary programs reconsidered. The Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), 723–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusson, N., Atsushi, I., & Stephens, J. (2011). The social and political complexities of learning in carbon capture and storage demonstration projects. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & McConnel, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 88(2), 564–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01803.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S., & Sanderson, I. (1999). Evaluating public policy experiments. Evaluation, 5(3), 245–258. doi: 10.1177/13563899922208977
   Google Scholar
• Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1979). Experiments on the provision of public goods. I. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1335–1360. doi: 10.1086/226937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. W., Lyon, T. P., & Hackett, S. C. (2000). Self-regulation and social welfare. Journal of Law and Economics, 43, 583–618. doi: 10.1086/467466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. (2008). Evaluating the performance of environmental institutions. In O. Young, L. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Insitutions and environmental change (pp. 79–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitnick, B. (2011). Capturing capture. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation (pp. 34–49). Northampton: Edwar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., Beatley, T., & Boyer, H. (2009). Resilient cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. (2011). The single point of failure. In S. Van der Hof & M. Groothuis (Eds.), Innovating government (pp. 77–99). The Hague: Asserr Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, W. (2002). From muddling through to muddling up. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 43–60. doi: 10.1177/095207670201700304
   Google Scholar
• Petts, J. (2007). Learning about learning. The Geographical Journal, 173(4), 300–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00254.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (2002 [1935]). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2009). Voluntary programs: A club theory perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. (2012). Measuring policy learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1145–1164. doi: 10.1080/13501760903332647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Register, R. (1987). Ecocity berkeley. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, E. M., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1157–1178. doi: 10.1002/smj.796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D. (1996). Elite interviewing. Politics, 16(3), 199–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.1996.tb00039.x
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, J., & de Leon, P. (2004). Is greener whiter? The Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 417–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2011). Diverse perspectives on the groupthink theory. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4(1), 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2011). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 169–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarra, J. (2011). New governance, old norms, and the potential for corporate governance reform. Law & Policy, 33(4), 576–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00350.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schout, A., Jordan, A., & Twena, M. (2010). From ‘old' to ‘new' governance in the EU. West European Politics, 33(1), 154–170. doi: 10.1080/01402380903354205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2009). Governing without law or governing without government? European Law Journal, 15(2), 160–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00456.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shearing, C., & Wood, J. (2003). Nodal governance, democracy and the new ‘denizens'. Journal of Law and Society, 30(3), 400–419. doi: 10.1111/1467-6478.00263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J. (2008). Law and governance in the 21st century regulatory state. Texas Law Review, 86, 819–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. (2006). Instrument choice. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée & E. Hey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental law (pp. 147–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (2002). Policy paradox. The art of political decision making. (Revised ed.). New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. (2009). Barriers to new modes of horizontal governance. Public Management Review, 11(3), 299–316. doi: 10.1080/14719030902798180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreugdenhil, H., Slinger, J., Thissen, W., & Ker Rault, P. (2010). Pilot projects in water management. Ecology and Society, 15(3), article no. 13. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art13/
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., & Hemmelskamp, J. (2005). Towards environmental innovation systems. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar