The Power to Frame the Scale? Analysing Scalar Politics over, in and of a Deliberative Governance Process

References

• Alders, H. (2011). Van mega naar beter. Rapportage van de maatschappelijke dialoog over schaalgrootte en toekomst van de veehouderij [From mega to better. Reporting of the societal dialogue about scale size and the future of animal husbandry]. Den Haag: Ministerie van Economische zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. (2008). Pragmatism and power, or the power to make a difference in a radically contingent world. Geoforum, 39(4), 1613–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2007). Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional studies, 41(9), 1161–1175. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction. Studies of talk at work. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1970). Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M., & Gallego, R. (2006). From ‘new institutionalism' to ‘institutional processualism': Advancing knowledge about public management policy change. Governance, 19(4), 531–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2006.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleker, H. (2011). Visie veehouderij [The future of intensive agriculture]. The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation (kst-28973-44).
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614. doi: 10.1191/030913201682688959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R. (1997). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00048-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckla, N. (2003). Insurgent urbanism in a railway quarter: Scalar citizenship at King's Cross, London. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 2(1), 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, D., & Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16(2), 93–97. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00045-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., & Bouwen, R. (2008). Frames, scales and actors. A case study of collaborative water governance in Southern Ecuador. Paper presented at the European Group of Public Administration Conference, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., & Bouwen, R. (2012). Issue framing in conversations for change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48(2), 168–193. doi: 10.1177/0021886312438858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Craps, M., & Dercon, G. (2004). How issues get framed and reframed when different communities meet: A multi-level analysis of a collaborative soil conservation initiative in the Ecuadorian Andes. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), 177–192. doi: 10.1002/casp.772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & van Woerkum, C. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62(2), 155–193. doi: 10.1177/0018726708100356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, L. E., & Donohue, W. A. (1996). Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution. Communication Research, 23(3), 297–322. doi: 10.1177/009365096023003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterling, W. E., & Polsky, C. (2008). Crossing the divide: Linking global and local scales in human–environment systems. In E. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method (pp. 66–85). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1970). Was ist Soziologie? [What is sociology]. Munich: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 217–239. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00092-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. In R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliott (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp. 11–34). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36(2), 175–195. doi: 10.1023/a:1024834510939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (1998). Strategies of engagement: Lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organization Science, 9(2), 217–230. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.2.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. L. (2006). ‘Accidents’ and invisibilities: Scaled discourse and the naturalization of regulatory neglect in California's pesticide drift conflict. Political Geography, 25(5), 506–529. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2009). Deliberative governance in the context of power. Policy and Society, 28(3), 173–184. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Herod, A. (1997). Labor's spatial praxis and the geography of contract bargaining in the US east coast longshore industry, 1953–1989. Political Geography, 16(2), 145–169. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00048-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt, R. (2003). Scale. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography (pp. 138–157). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate. The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G. (1994). The scale politics of spatiality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12, 257–264. doi: 10.1068/d120257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, R., & Nikiforova, E. (2008). The performativity of scale: The social construction of scale effects in Narva, Estonia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 537–562. doi: 10.1068/d3307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, H. E. (2003). Scale frames and counter-scale frames: Constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Political Geography, 22(8), 887–916. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kythreotis, A. P., & Jonas, A. E. G. (2012). Scaling sustainable development? How voluntary groups negotiate spaces of sustainability governance in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(3), 381–399. doi: 10.1068/d11810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebel, L., Garden, P., & Imamura, M. (2005). The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecology and Society, 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art18/ doi: 10.5751/ES-01543-100218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H. (1997). Reconfiguring the spatiality of power: The construction of a supranational migration framework for the European Union. Political Geography, 16(2), 123–143. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00047-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H. (2004). The politics of scale and networks of spatial connectivity: Transnational interurban networks and the rescaling of political governance in Europe. In E. Sheppard & R. B. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry (pp. 236–255). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005 [1974]). Power: A radical view (2nd expanded ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. (2011). Reconstructing scale: Towards a new scalar politics. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 21–36. doi: 10.1177/0309132510367841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P. J., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1993). Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In J. Bird, B. Curtis, & T. Putnam (Eds.), Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change (pp. 59–69). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mccann, E. J. (2003). Framing space and time in the city: Urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 159–178. doi: 10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2005). Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode, 37(4), 731–753. doi: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00523.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B. (1997). Political action and the geography of defense investment: Geographical scale and the representation of the Massachusetts miracle. Political Geography, 16(2), 171–185. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00049-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Economische zaken Landbouw en Innovatie. (2011). Dialoog megastallen [Dialogue mega-stables]. Retrieved from http://www.dialoogmegastallen.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337–348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00020-1
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis. Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. W. A. (2013). Agenda dynamics and the multi-level governance of intractable policy controversies: The case of migrant integration policies in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 46(3), 217–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2011). Conceptualising policy: Technologies of governance and the politics of visibility. In C. Shore, S. Wright, & D. Però (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012 [1988]). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006. doi: 10.1080/00420980500279869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. R. (2000). Models for research into decision-making processes: On phases, streams and decision-making rounds. Public Administration, 78(4), 937–956. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power talk. Language and interaction in institutional discourse. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance. Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., & Boonman-Berson, S. (2011). Databases, scaling practices, and the globalization of biodiversity. Ecology and Society, 16(1). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss31/art35/ doi: 10.5751/ES-03981-160135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15(4). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss24/art26/ doi: 10.5751/ES-03701-150426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eeten, M. (2001). The challenge ahead for deliberative democracy: In reply to Weale. Science and Public Policy, 28(6), 423–426. doi: 10.3152/147154301781781200
   Google Scholar
• Van Lieshout, M., Dewulf, A., Aarts, N., & Termeer, C. (2012). Doing scalar politics: Interactive scale framing for managing accountability in complex policy processes. Critical Policy Studies, 6(2), 163–181. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2012.689736
   Google Scholar
• Van Lieshout, M., Dewulf, A., Aarts, N., & Termeer, C. (2013). Framing scale increase in Dutch agricultural policy 1950–2012. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 64–65, 35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.njas.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lieshout, M., Dewulf, A. R. P. J., Aarts, M. N. C., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2011). Do scale frames matter? Scale frame mismatches in the decision making process of a ‘mega farm' in a small Dutch village. Ecology and Society, 16(1). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art38/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vink, M. J., Dewulf, A. R. P. J., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2012). An alternative understanding of climate adaptation governance: Powering and puzzling through frame interactions over unsolvable problems. Paper presented at the symposium, The Governance of Adaptation, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar