Les Reciproqueteurs: post-regulatory corporatism

References

• Afforder, N. (2010). Rethinking environmental contracting. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 21, 155–180.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, C. (1990). From social market to meso-Corporatism: The politics of West German economic policy. German Studies Review, 13, 13–25. doi:10.2307/1431032
   Google Scholar
• Amable, B. (2005). Complementary hierarchy, compatibility, coherence. Socio-Economic Review, 3, 311–330. doi:10.1093/SER/mwi013
   Google Scholar
• Ames, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. (2000). The networked polity: Regional development in Western Europe. Governance, 13, 279–291. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16, 290–306. doi:10.1002/eet.425
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, G. (n.d.). Research technology enterprise initiative. Retrieved from rtei.org/blog/frame-agreements/
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2001). A decentered theory of governance: Rational choice, institutionalism and interpretation. Working Paper 2001–19. Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2001). Decentring regulation: Understanding the role of regulation and self-regulation in a ‘post-regulatory’ world. Current Legal Problems, 54, 103–146. doi:10.1093/clp/54.1.103
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). The evolution of strong reciprocity: Cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 65, 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., & Saillard, Y. (Eds.). (2002). Régulation theory: The state of the art (Carolyn Shread, Trans.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandl, B., & Traxler, F. (2005). Industrial relations, social pacts and welfare expenditures: A cross-national comparison. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43, 635–658. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8543.2005.00477.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (1972). Competition and collective bargaining in the needle trades, 1910–1967. Ithaca: Cornell University/New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). Social responsibility standardization: Guidance or reinforcement through standardization. Human Systems Management, 27, 231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. (2010). Rethinking world politics: A theory of transnational neopluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. (1999). Regulating contracts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2005). Capitalist diversity: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2012, June 29). There is an alternative to neoliberalism that still understands the markets. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jun/27/alternative-neoliberalism-still-understands-markets
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., & Traxler, F. (Eds.). (1995). Organized industrial relations in Europe: What future? Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. (2001). Decentralized cooperation and the future of regulatory reforms. Discussion paper presented at European political economy workshop on ‘Interests and -coalitions’, Minda de Gunzberg Center for European Studies at Harvard University, January 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. (2011). Powering, puzzling and ‘pacting': The informational logic of negotiated reforms. Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 774–790. doi:10.1080/13501760210162357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, K., Rei, F., & Waller, A. C. (2012). Subnational climate-friendly governance initiatives in the developing world: A case study of São Paulo, Brazil. In E. Brousseau, T. Dedeuwaerdere, & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Reflexive governance for public goods (pp. 145–158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2011). Challenging governance theory: From networks to hegemony. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2005). From bioprospecting to reflexive governance. Ecological Economics, 53(4), 473–491. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2010). The contribution of network governance to sustainable development. Working Paper. Institut du developpment et des relations durable international. Paris: École Polytechnique.
   Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. (2010). Deleuze: History and science. New York: Atropos.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations: 1972–90 (M. Jongblom, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, B. (2006, June 17). Reforming Bismarckian Corporatism: The changing role of social partnership in Continental Europe. Paper presented at Minda de Gunzberg Center for European Studies, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, B., & Hassel, A. (2000). Striking deals: Concentration in the reform of continental European welfare states. Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 44–62. doi:10.1080/135017600343269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. (2005). Functionally, overlapping, competing jurisdictions: Re-drawing the geographic border of administration. European Journal of Law Reform, 5, 543–555.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B., & Eichenberger, R. (1996). FOCJ: Competitive governments for Europe. International Review of Law and Economics, 16, 315–327. doi:10.1016/0144-8188(96)00019-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12, 78–104. doi:10.1080/09692290500049805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. (2012). Regulatory reform and reflexive regulation: Beyond command and control. In E. Brousseau, T. Dedeurwaerdere, & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Reflexive governance for public goods (pp. 85–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, P. (1997). Negotiating regulations: A cure for Malaise. Georgetown Law Review, 71, 1–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2007). State power: A strategic-relational approach. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, P. (2013). Transnational normative orders: The constitutionalism of intra- and trans-normative law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20, 777–803. doi:10.2979/indjglolegstu.20.2.777
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1974). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (2003). Space and the state. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones, & G. MacLeod (Eds.), State/space: A reader (pp. 84–100). Boston: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmbruch, G. (1998, May 30). Negotiated democracy, consociationalism, and corporatism in German politics: The legacy of the Westphalian peace. Paper presented at the Minda de Gunzberg Center for European Studies, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Lipietz, A. (1989). Mirages and miracles: Crises in global fordism (D. Macey, Trans.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lordon, F. (2010). La Crise de Trop: Reconstruction de une monde faille. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1982). The differentiation of society (Stephen Holmes and Charles Larmore, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. (2003). Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macneil, I. R. (1980). The new social contract. New Haven, CO: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macneil, I. R. (1987). Relational contract theory as sociology Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 143, 272–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattei, U., & Bailey, S. (2013). Protecting the commons: Water, culture and nature: The commons movement in the Italian social movements in the Italian struggle against neoliberal governance. South Atlantic Quarterly, 112, 366–376. doi:10.1215/00382876-2020244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlinger, E. (1981). On the autonomy of the democratic state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nullmeier, F. (2006). The cognitive turn in public policy analysis. Working Paper N. 4. Bremen: Governance for Sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Orts, W. E. (1995a). Reflexive environmental law. Northwestern University Law Review, 89, 1227–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orts, W. E. (1995b). A reflexive model of environmental regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5, 779–794. doi:10.2307/3857414
   Google Scholar
• Orts, W. E. (2011). Climate contracts. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 29, 197–236.
   Google Scholar
• Orts, W. E., & Strudler, A. (2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 215–233. doi:10.2307/3857811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions of collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1994). Neither market nor state governance: Of common-pool resources in the twenty first century. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). A long polycentric journey. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.090808.123259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (1997). Neither markets nor states: Linking transformation processes in collective action arenas. In D. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice: A handbook (pp. 35–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (2009). Trust and reciprocity as foundations for cooperation. In K. Cook, M. Levi, & R. Hardin (Eds.), Who can we trust? How groups, networks, and institutions make trust possible (pp. 91–124). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (2006). Agencement/assemblage. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 108–109. doi:10.1177/026327640602300219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, A. (2010). Does discourse matter in the formation and consolidation of social pacts? Social partnership and labour market policy in Ireland. Critical Policy Studies, 4, 250–277. doi:10.1080/19460171.2010.508922
   Google Scholar
• Regan, A. (2012). The political economy of the social wage-pacts in the EMU: Irish (Neo) Liberal Corporatism in Crisis (2008–2010). New Political Science, 17, 465–491.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, K. (1929/1949). The institutions of private law and their social functions (A. Schwarzchild, Trans., O. Kahn-Freund, Ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (2001). The political economy of social pacts: Competitive corporatism and European welfare reform. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of welfare (pp. 165–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. (1994). Learning by monitoring: The institutions of economic development. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook for economic development (pp. 137–165). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. (1997). Constitutional orders: Trust building and response to change. In R. Hollingsworth & R. Boyer (Eds.), Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions (pp. 154–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. & Simon, W. (2006). Gaps and hybrids/ epilogue: Sovereignty without accountability. In G. DeBurca & J. Scott (Eds.), New governance and constitutionalism in Europe and the US (pp. 395–411). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. (1989). Corporatism is dead! Long live corporatism! Government and Opposition, 24, 54–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1989.tb00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. (2007). What has become of corporatism? What happened to neo-corporatism? Where has neo-corporatism gone? Unpublished paper. European University Institute Florence.
   Google Scholar
• Sciulli, D. (1992). The theory of societal constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. (2004). Regulation in the age of governance: The rise of the post-regulatory state. In J. Jordana & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The politics of regulation and development (pp. 145–174). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Setzer, J. (2009). Subnational and transnational climate governance: Evidence from the state and city of São Paulo, Brazil. London School of Economics. Retrieved from http:www/cetesb.sp.gov.br/mundancasclimaticas/proclima/file/publicacoes/politic-economial.cc.governance_evidence.sp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, N. (2005). Social pacts revisited: ‘Competitive concentration' and complex causality in negotiated welfare state reforms. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 11, 107–126. doi:10.1177/0959680105052235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinzheimer, H., & Fränkel, E. (1968). Die Justiz in der Weimarer Republik: Eine Chronik. Introduction by Otto Kirchheimer. Berlin: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• Smismans, S. (2004). Reflexive law in support of directly deliberative polyarchy: Reflexive deliberative polyarchy as a normative frame for the OMC. In O. DeSchutter & S. Deakin (Eds.), Social rights and market forces: Is the open coordination of employment and social policies in the future for social Europe? (pp. 99–144). Brussels: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalisation or ‘glocalization'? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17, 25–48. doi:10.1080/0955757042000203632
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (1986). After legal instrumentalism: Strategic models of post-regulatory law. In G. Teubner (Ed.), Dilemmas of law in the welfare state (pp. 299–326). New York: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (1996). De Collisione Discursuvm: Communicative rationalities in law, morality and politics. Cardozo Law Review, 17, 901–918.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (1998). The king's many bodies: The self-destruction of law's hierarchy. Law & Society Review, 31, 763–787. doi:10.2307/3053986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (2003/04). Coincdentia oppositorium: Networks and law beyond contracts and organization. Storrs Lectures 2003/04. New Haven, CT: Yale Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (2007). In the blind spot: The hybridization of contracting. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8, 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G. (2012). Constitutional fragments: Societal constitutionalism and globalization (Gareth Norbury, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G., & Collins, H. (2011). Networks as connected contracts (Michelle Everson, Trans.). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G., Farmer, L., & Murphy, D. (Eds.). (1999). Environmental law and ecological responsibility: The concept and practice of ecological self-organization. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tjiong, H. (2002). Institutional dynamics in environmental corporatism: The impact of market and technological change in the Dutch Polder Model. Working Paper. Bonn: Max Planck-Projektgruppe/Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter.
   Google Scholar
• Toffel, M., Short, J., & Ouellet, M. (2012, November 20). Reinforcing regulatory regimes: How states, civil society and codes of conduct promote adherence to global labor standards. Harvard Business School Working Paper 13–045.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, F. (1995). From demand-side corporatism to supply-side corporatism. In C. Crouch & F. Traxler (Eds.), Organized industrial relations in Europe: What future? (pp. 271–286). Avebury: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, F. (2001). Die Metamorphosen des Korporativismus: Von Klassischer zum Schlanken Muster. Politische Vierteljahresschift, 42, 590–623. doi:10.1007/s11615-001-0100-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, F. (2003). Bargaining institutions and the monetary regimes: A cross-national comparison and its implications for European monetary union. Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 596–615. doi:10.1080/1350176032000101271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupone, F. (2009). From neo-corporatism to neo-neo corporatism: Sovereignty, social dialogue and international political economy. Paper presented at the European Consortium on Political Research (ECPR), Universitad Autonoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• van der Veen, Yerkes, M., & Achterberg, P. (2012). The transformation of solidarity: Changing risks and the future of the welfare state. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction. In J.-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, R. (2005). Transnational law and private ordering in contested global society. Harvard International Law Journal, 46, 471–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, D. (2001). Labour markets, flexible specialization and the new micro-corporatism: The case of industrial relations of Canada's major appliance industry. Industrial Relations/Relations Industielles, 56, 277–304.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1979). Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 231–261. doi:10.1086/466942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willke, H. (1986). Three Types of legal structures: The conditional, the purposive, and the relational program. In G. Teubner (Ed.), The dilemmas of law in the welfare state (pp. 280–298). New York: DeGruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, L. (2008). Lecture 12: Image and video compression. Retrieved from http://~xix/ee4830.www.Ee.columbia.edu
   Google Scholar
• Zumbansen, P. (2006). The conundrum of corporate social responsibility: Reflections on the changing nature of firms and states. Comparative Research in Law and Political Economy (CLPE). Research Paper 2/1 (2006). Osgoode Hall Law School. Toronto: York University.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbansen, P. (2009). Post-regulatory law: Chronicle of a career foretold. Paper presented at February Faculty Seminar, McGill University Faculty of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbansen, P., & Calliness, G.-P. (2010). Rough consensus and running code: A theory of transnational private law. London: Hart.
   Google Scholar