Sustainable Mobility—Challenges for a Complex Transition

References

• Amekudzi, A. A., Khisty, C. J., & Khayesi, M. (2009). Using the sustainability footprint model to assess development impacts of transportation systems. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 339–348.
   Google Scholar
• Avineri, E., & Goodwin, P. (2010). Individual behaviour change: Evidence in transport and public health project report. London Department for Transport. Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11211/2/
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. (2007). Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory politics and the seductive appeal of ecological modernisation in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 297–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S. (2009). The Munich dialogue marketing campaign for new citizens—Using residential relocation as a starting point for breaking car use habit. In T. Geerken & M. Borup (Eds.), System innovation for sustainability 2—Cases studies in consumption and production mobility (pp. 79–90). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., Heller, J., Heipp, G., & Nallinger, S. (2008). Multimodales Marketing für Münchner Neubürger: Entwicklung, Evaluation, Ausblick. Internationales Verkehrswesen, 3(60), 73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2005). Unsustainable transport. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2011a). The trilogy of distance, speed and time. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 950–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2011b). Cities, mobility and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1538–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., Stead, D., Steen, P., Akerman, J., Dreborg, K., Nijkamp, P., & Tappeser, R. S. (2000). European transport policy and sustainable mobility. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellmann, J., Eichinger, A., Eisenkopf, A., & Knorr, A. (2009). Urban congestion charging with an environmental component—The central London congestion charge. FÖV Discussion Papers 47. Retrieved November 26, 2012, from http://192.124.238.248/fbpdf/dp-047.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Black, W. R. (2003). Transportation: A geographical analysis. London: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, W. R. (2010). Sustainable transportation: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, W. R., & Nijkamp, P. (Eds.). (2002). Social change and sustainable transport. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callonec, G., & Sannié, I. (2009). Evaluation of the economic and ecological effects of the French ‘bonus malus’. ECEEE Summer Study, Paris. Retrieved September 22, 2011, from http://www.eceee.org/conference_proceedings/eceee/2009/Panel_2/2.273/Paper/
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, H., & Pitfield, D. E. (2010). ELASTIC—A methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(4), 179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2011). Roadmap to a single European transport area—Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system White paper 144 final. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commoner, B. (1972). The environmental cost of economic growth. In R. G. Ridker (Ed.), Population, Resources and the Environment (pp. 339–363). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2011). Mobility vs. affordability as motivations for car-ownership choice in urban fringe, low-income Australia. In K. Lucas, E. Blumenberg, & R. Weinberger (Eds.), Auto motives. Understanding car use behaviours (pp. 193–208). Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Dalkmann, H., & Brannigan, C. (2007). Transport and Climate Change. Eschborn: Sourcebook Module 5e, GTZ.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, J., & Sipe, N. (2007). Oil vulnerability in the Australian city: Assessing socioeconomic risks from higher urban fuel prices. Urban Studies, 44(1), 37–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA. (2008). Beyond transport policy: Exploring and managing the external drivers of transport demand. (Technical Report No. 12). Copenhagen, Denmark: EEA.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. (2011). Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource. White Paper, COM(2011) 144 final CEC (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2014). Energy, transport and environment indicators. Pocketbook 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2014, from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DK-13-001/EN/KS-DK-13-001-EN.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, M., & Skinner, I. (2000). EU—Fuel and vehicle tax policy. Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden. Retrieved September 22, 2011, from http://www.ieeplondon.org.uk/ publications/pdfs/2000/EUfueland vehicletax.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2012). The multi-level perspective as a new perspective for studying socio-technical transitions. In F. W. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, & G. Lyons (Eds.), Automobility in transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport (pp. 49–79). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., Kemp, R., Dudley, G., & Lyons, G. (2012). Automobility in transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Goeverden, C., Rietveld, P. et al. (2006). Subsidies in public transport. European Transport, 11, 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P. (2012). Three views on peak car. Transport Policy and Practice, 17(4), 8–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, H., & Höjer, M. (1996). Sustainable development principles and their implications for transport. Ecological Economics, 19(3), 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., Austin, P., & Banister, D. (2014). Hyperautomobility and governmentality in Auckland. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(3). doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.954074
   Google Scholar
• Hildermeier, J., & Villareal, A. (2014). Two ways of defining sustainable mobility: Autolib’ and BeMobility. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(3). doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.880336
   Google Scholar
• Holden, E. (2007). Achieving sustainable mobility—Everyday and leisure-time travel in the EU. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, E., & Linnerud, K. (2011). Troublesome leisure travel: The contradictions of three sustainable transport policies. Urban Studies, 48(14), 3087–3106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2013). Sustainable passenger transport: Back to Brundtland. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 54, 67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høyer, K. G. (2000). Sustainablemobility—The concept and its implications. (Ph.D. thesis). Roskilde: Roskilde University.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2009). Transport, energy and CO2: Moving towards sustainability. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2010). World energy outlook 2010. Paris: The International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2012). Energy technology perspectives 2012: Pathways to a clean energy system. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2005). Live better by consuming less? Is there a ‘Double Dividend' in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julsrud, T. E. (2014). Activity-based patterns of everyday mobility: The potential for long-term behaviour change across five groups of travellers. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(3). doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.837380
   Google Scholar
• Kodransky, M., & Hermann, G. (2011). Europe’s parking U-Turn: From accommodation to regulation. New York: ITDP.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, P., & Prud'homme, R. (2008). Urban tolls: Price and congestion. Some lessons for a better urban public policy. Retrieved November 26, 2012, from http://www.biu.ac.il/soc/ec/seminar/data/20.04.09/The%20Stockholm%20Toll%20-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lautso, K., & Toivanen, S. (1999). SPARTACUS system for analysing urban sustainability. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record No. 1670.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T., & Burwell, D. (2006). Issues in sustainable transportation. International Journal Global Environmental Issues, 6(4), 331–347.
   Google Scholar
• Low, N., & Astle, R. (2009). Path dependence in urban transport: An institutional analysis of urban passenger transport in Melbourne, Australia, 1956–2006. Transport Policy, 16(2), 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli, G. (2014). Where sustainable transport and social exclusion meet: Households without cars and car dependence in Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(3). doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.858592
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, D., Owen, P., McAndrew, L., Muehmel, K., & Neubauer, A. (2011). Addressing the rebound effect. Brussels: European Commission DG ENV.
   Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A., & Schipper, L. (2011). Are we reaching peak travel? Trends in passenger transport in eight industrialized countries. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 31(3), 357–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MiSA. (2012). Norwegian high speed railway project—Phase 3. Trondheim: MiSA Environmental System Analyses.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005a). Travel as a desired end, not just a mean. Transportation Research Part A, 39(2–3), 93–96.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005b). When is getting there half the fun? Modelling the liking for travel. Transportation Research Part A, 39(2–3), 97–124.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2006). Urban structure matters: Residential location, car dependence and travel behavior. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2012). ‘Peak Car Use’: Understanding the demise of automobile dependence. Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nijhuis, J. O. (2013). Consuming mobility: A practice approach to sustainable mobility transitions. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2000). Environmentally Sustainable Transport, futures, strategies and best practices. Synthesis Report of the OECD project on Environmentally Sustainable Transport EST. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=env/epoc/wpnep/t(2001)8/final
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). Decoupling the environmental impacts of transport from economic growth. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). Incentives for CO2 emission reduction in current motor vehicle taxes. Paris: Working Party on National Environmental Policies. Retrieved from http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/jtrc/RoundTables/feb10-18Braathen1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, G., Kemp, R., Dijk, M., & Sherwin, H. (2012). Intermodal personal mobility: A niche caught between two regimes. In F. W. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, & G. Lyons (Eds.), Automobility in transition? (pp. 308–334). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peden, M., Scurfield, R., Sleet, D., Mohan, D., Hyder, A. A., Jarawan, E., & Mathers, C. (2004). World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, A., & Dütschke, E. (2014). How do consumers perceive electric vehicles? A comparison of German consumer groups. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(3). doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.879037
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. (1920). The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Puhe, M., & Schippl, J. (2014). User perceptions and attitudes on sustainable urban transport among young adults: Findings from Copenhagen, Budapest and Karlsruhe. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 16(3), in this volume.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Root, R. A., Schintler, L., & Button, S. (2002). Women and travel: The sustainability implications of changing roles. In W. R. Black & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Social change and sustainable transport (pp. 149–156). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudinger, G. (2002). Mobility behaviour of the elderly: Its impacts on the future road traffic system. In W. R. Black & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Social change and sustainable transport (pp. 157–164). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, J., Apte, J. S., Lemoine, D. M., & Kammen, D. M. (2011). Reduce growth rate of light-duty vehicle travel to meet 2050 global climate goals. Environmental Research Letters, 6(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2006). Freedom as mobility: Implications of the distinction between actual and potential travelling. Mobilities, 1, 465–488.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, P. L., Bruun, E. C., & Kenworthy, J. R. (2010). An introduction to sustainable transportation: Policy, planning, and implementation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, L., & Lilliu, C. M. (1999). Transportation and CO2 emissions: Flexing the link. A path for the World Bank. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Shiftan, Y., Kaplan, S., & Hakkert, S. (2003). Scenario building as a tool for planning a sustainable transportation system. Transportation Research Part D, 8(5), 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. London: UK Energy Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. (2003). Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 16(8), 687–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture—Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 813–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (1999). Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, 22, 461–478.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillberg, K. (2002). Residential location and daily mobility patterns: A Swedish case study of households with children. In W. R. Black & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Social change and sustainable transport (pp. 165–172). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Upham, P., Kivimaa, P., & Virkamäki, V. (2013). Path dependence and technological expectations in transport policy: The case of Finland and the UK. Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2004). The ‘System’ of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uteng, T. P. (2006). Mobility: Discourses from the non-western immigrant groups in Norway. Mobilities, 1(3), 437–464.
   Google Scholar
• WCED. (1987). Our common future: World commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xenias, D., & Whitmarsh, L. E. (2013). Dimensions and determinants of expert and public attitudes to sustainable transport policies and technologies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 75–85.
   Google Scholar